--- name: ripwire-handoff description: > Brief someone ELSE on a subsystem — 'hand this area off' to a successor, teammate or fresh session: purpose, the 2-3 entry points with bodies, the design docs that say WHY, hotspot/bus-factor risk — a compact pasteable brief, not a wall of source. Understanding it yourself → orient. allowed-tools: Bash, Read --- # Handoff with ripwire > Nearest neighbours: > • You need to UNDERSTAND the subsystem yourself first (not brief someone else) → **ripwire-orient**. > • You need ONE symbol's full contract, not a whole-subsystem brief → **ripwire-navigate** (`--expand`). > • The recipient needs an architecture/layering read specifically → **ripwire-layers**. Trigger: you're handing a subsystem to another agent or developer and want to give them a fast, accurate brief — not a wall of source code. `` = repo root. `SUBSYSTEM` = the area in plain words (e.g. "ingest pipeline", "graph ranking", "MCP server loop"). 1. **Task-relevant symbols** — `ripwire --for="SUBSYSTEM" --top-k=20` Output: `` ranked by relevance. The top 10 are the symbols the recipient most needs to know. Note their file paths, complexity (`cx=`), and reuse count (`in=`). 2. **Expand the key symbols** — `ripwire --expand=SYM1,SYM2,SYM3 --legend=compact` (Pick the top 3 by rank from step 1.) Output: full bodies + callee signatures. This is the actual contract — paste it into the handoff verbatim rather than paraphrasing. **Bodies are redacted by default** — high-confidence credentials (API keys, tokens, connection strings) are masked before you see them, so pasting this straight into a handoff doc is safe as-is; pass `--no-redact` only if you deliberately need the verbatim secret (e.g. auditing the credential-handling code itself). 3. **Design rationale** — `ripwire --recall="SUBSYSTEM"` Output: most relevant markdown docs (planning/design notes, READMEs) in full. Read and summarize the key decisions — why this design, not another. That's what the recipient most needs and least gets from reading code. Also check `ripwire --notes --legend=compact` for this subsystem's symbols/files — any gotcha a prior agent already pinned (`…`) surfaces automatically on the symbols step 1/2 emit; fold it into the brief instead of letting the recipient rediscover it. Before you hand off, `--note-add="SYM_or_path: text"` any trap you found yourself that isn't already written down — the cheapest thing you can leave the successor. If the same symbol has collected several notes across handoffs, that's a signal to graduate it out of prose entirely, into a `--quality-ack` reason or a standing `--arch` deny rule. 4. **Maintenance risk, scoped to the subsystem** — point `--hotspots` straight at the subsystem instead of filtering the whole-repo list: `ripwire --hotspots` (verified: subdir scoping works, same as `--dead-code=DIR`). If the subsystem isn't a clean subdirectory, keep the repo root and `--exclude` the rest (repeatable flag) to fence the scan to just the area you're briefing on. Also worth a look: `ripwire --hotspots --legend=compact` (whole-repo, no scoping) to see whether any subsystem file also lands in the *global* top-10 — a file can be locally worst-in-subsystem and still unremarkable repo-wide, or vice versa; that distinction matters to the recipient. Tell them: "this file is gnarly — high churn, high complexity — be careful and run tests after any change here." ## Calibration — what's fact vs framing here - Steps 1–3 are direct reads (ranked signatures, full bodies, doc text) — trustworthy as far as the underlying call graph goes (name-based edges; a symbol with high `amb=` in `--expand`'s `` block means some of ITS calls were ambiguous — don't present those as certain in the brief, flag them). `--recall` returns doc *text*, not a verified fact — summarize what the docs claim, not what's provably still true; a stale design doc will still get picked up. - Step 4 (hotspots) is `churn × cognitive complexity` — a maintenance-pain *signal*, not a defect count. Frame it to the recipient as "developers keep touching this, tread carefully," not "this file has bugs." ## Stamp the commit you measured at — `at="[+dirty]"` A brief is read hours or days later, against a HEAD that has moved. **Every number you quote must carry the commit it was measured at**, or the recipient cannot tell a stale finding from a live one. Several repo-reading verbs now do this for you: the header carries `at=""`, and `at="+dirty"` when the working tree had uncommitted changes at measure time. Real output from this repo: ``` ``` **`+dirty` is the important half.** A stamp ending in `+dirty` means the numbers describe a working tree that exists on exactly one machine and is not recoverable from the sha — it is *not* reproducible by the recipient. Either commit first and re-measure, or say so explicitly in the brief. **What actually carries a stamp today (verified by running each verb — do not assume it is universal):** | verb | stamp | |---|---| | `--quality-delta` · `--pr-context` · `--test-gate` · `--map-diff` · `--doc-drift` | `at="[+dirty]"` | | `--stray-content` | `head=""` — different attribute name, and **no `+dirty` suffix** | | `--situ` · `--cochange` · `--owners` | **none** — record the sha yourself (`git rev-parse --short HEAD`) | Two traps: the attribute is `head=` rather than `at=` on `--stray-content`, so a script grepping only for `at=` silently gets nothing; and in `--doc-drift` the name `at=` is *overloaded* — the header `at=` is a git sha, but each drift ROW's `at=` is a **file path** (`at="src/mcp.h"`). Anchor on the header, not the first match. ## Output Handoff brief: (1) what the subsystem does in 2 sentences, (2) the 3 key entry-point symbols with file:line and their signatures (from `--expand`), (3) the design decisions the recipient must know (from `--recall`), (4) any hotspot files to be careful with, flagged if churn/complexity data looks stale (no git history, non-git root). Aim for under 600 tokens. ## Mid-task session handoff — `--handoff` Handing off an INTERRUPTED WORKING SESSION (not a subsystem summary)? `ripwire --handoff --legend=compact` emits the whole continuation packet in one deterministic call: a `` section (branch, HEAD sha with `+dirty` marker, changed files + their symbols, transitive blast-radius size, tests-to-run) that is pure disk truth, and a `` section (co-change partners not in the diff, committed `--note-add` notes on the touched files, plan/design doc pointers ranked by a branch+commit-subject query) that is labeled suggestion, never presented as fact. Composes with `--token-budget=N` — heuristic rows drop tail-first and the header discloses `withheld=`; verified rows never drop. Single-root only; paste the packet to the next agent as-is.