--- name: review-pr description: Review a pull request using specialized reviewer agents argument-hint: PR number (may include additional context) --- # Review PR Review a pull request with category-based reviewer agents. ## Process ### 1. Get PR Context Determine the PR number from the user's request, which may carry context beyond the number. Fetch the PR details and diff: ```bash gh pr view gh pr diff gh pr view --json title,body,commits ``` ### 2. Categorize and Review Launch relevant reviewer agents based on changed files: - Backend changes -> `backend-reviewer` - Frontend changes -> `frontend-reviewer` - CI/test changes -> `test-reviewer` - Non-trivial code changes -> `structure-reviewer` - All changes -> `general-reviewer` - All changes -> `doc-reviewer`, given the PR title, the PR description and the commit messages ### 3. Verify Documentation `doc-reviewer` owns doc-code mismatch: where code changed public behavior, it checks the docs say so. ### 4. Report Review Reviewers flag findings they could not confirm as `suspected` (they have no web access, and some issues resist static reading). Before reporting, resolve each: verify post-cutoff versions against a live source, confirm others by re-reading the code; keep anything still unresolved under **Suspected** as a question -- never silently dropped. Then load the `gitwise:github-conventions` skill, write the review as its `review-format.md` says, save it to `.claude/workspace/pr--review.md` (replacing any earlier one), show it to the user and give them the path.