---
name: adjudicate-review
description: Turn an incoming set of findings — from an AI reviewer, a referee report, a code review, a linter, or a second model — into verified fixes, without letting a confident misread damage correct work. Every finding is a CANDIDATE until checked against the actual source. Use whenever you receive review comments, audit findings, or a critique you did not write yourself, especially when the reviewer is a model or when the volume is too large to check by feel.
---
<!-- Generated by scripts/sync-agent-skills.py from .claude/skills/adjudicate-review/SKILL.md. Do not edit: change the source and re-run the script. -->

# adjudicate-review

This skill's instructions live in [`.claude/skills/adjudicate-review/SKILL.md`](../../../.claude/skills/adjudicate-review/SKILL.md).
Read that file now and follow it, with the files it points to. Read [`AGENTS.md`](../../../AGENTS.md)
first if you have not already.

It was written for Claude Code. Running it from Codex, Antigravity or another agent:

- **Arguments.** Where it says `$ARGUMENTS`, use what the user asked for.
- **Claude Code agents.** Where a step hands work to an agent in `.claude/agents/` (through the
  `Agent` or `Task` tool), read that agent's file and do the step yourself after the main work.
  Tell the user the step was not an independent review: the same agent did both.
- **Claude Code settings.** `allowed-tools`, `model`, `effort`, `argument-hint` and
  `disable-model-invocation` in the source's frontmatter configure Claude Code. Ignore them.
- **Guards.** Claude Code's guard hooks do not run for you. Follow the rules in `AGENTS.md`
  yourself; the git pre-commit gate and CI still apply to your commits.