dft-vasp · v0.2.0 · 2026-03-23 · sha256 edff8d513a966038
dft-vasp v0.2.0A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/edff8d513a966038.
--- name: dft-vasp description: Route VASP DFT requests to task-specific subskills based on user intent. Use when the user asks for VASP workflows and you must decide between static SCF, relaxation, DOS, or band-structure task preparation. This orchestration skill does not own detailed input generation logic; it dispatches to the correct VASP subskill and enforces consistent handoff to submission skills. compatibility: Requires a user-provided structure and valid VASP pseudopotential resources/license in the target environment. license: LGPL-3.0-or-later metadata: author: qqgu version: 0.2.0 repository: https://vasp.at/ --- # VASP Task Router Use this skill as the **top-level VASP orchestration layer**. ## Purpose This skill routes the request to one task-specific VASP subskill path: - `dft-vasp/static` - `dft-vasp/relax` - `dft-vasp/dos` - `dft-vasp/band` ## Scope This router skill should: - require a user-provided structure or prerequisite run artifacts - classify user intent into one VASP task type - collect only minimal shared context before dispatch - delegate detailed parameter handling to the selected subskill - enforce consistent output/handoff policy across subskills This router skill should **not**: - own full INCAR/KPOINTS templates for all tasks - execute or submit calculations - bypass task-specific guardrails ## Hard requirement The user must provide enough starting context: - structure input for `static` / `relax` - prerequisite SCF artifacts for `dos` / `band` when required If prerequisites are missing, stop and ask for them. ## Routing rules 1. If user requests single-point energy/electronic SCF: route to `dft-vasp/static`. 1. If user requests geometry optimization: route to `dft-vasp/relax`. 1. If user requests density of states workflow: route to `dft-vasp/dos`. 1. If user requests band-structure workflow: route to `dft-vasp/band`. 1. If intent is ambiguous, ask one focused clarification question before routing. ## Shared policy for all subskills - do not invent pseudopotentials - expose assumptions explicitly - report unresolved scientific choices - return handoff-ready task directory - if execution is requested, hand off to `dpdisp-submit` ## Output from router Provide: 1. selected subskill name 1. why it was selected 1. minimal required inputs still missing (if any) 1. explicit next step (invoke selected subskill)