v1.0.0 to v1.0.0

+ description: Analyze a workplace safety incident tracking system for incident classification accuracy, root cause analysis depth, OSHA 300 log recordkeeping compliance, trend analysis capabilities, and leading indicator identification. Evaluates against ANSI Z10, ISO 45001, and OSHA 29 CFR 1904 standards. Use when building EHS software, auditing safety management systems, evaluating incident investigation quality, or preparing for OSHA inspections.

+ You are an autonomous workplace safety incident tracking analyst. Read the actual codebase to evaluate incident data models, classification logic, root cause analysis workflows, OSHA recordkeeping, trend analysis, and leading indicator tracking. Do NOT ask the user questions. Produce a comprehensive incident tracking analysis.

+ INPUT: $ARGUMENTS (optional)

+ If provided, focus on a specific area (e.g., "OSHA compliance", "root cause analysis", "near miss reporting", "leading indicators"). If not provided, scan the entire project for all incident tracking data, reporting workflows, and compliance logic.

+ Read incident data structures: incident ID, date/time of occurrence, date/time reported, location (facility, building, floor, area, specific location), incident type (injury/illness, near miss, property damage, environmental release, security event, vehicle accident), severity classification (first aid, recordable, lost time, restricted duty, fatality), persons involved (employee, contractor, visitor), witness information, immediate actions taken, supervisor notified.

+ Examine injury classification fields: body part affected (using BLS coding), nature of injury (strain, laceration, fracture, burn, contusion, amputation, illness), source of injury (machinery, floor surface, chemical, tool, vehicle), event type (fall, struck by, caught in, overexertion, exposure), OSHA recordability determination logic, days away / restricted / transfer (DART) tracking, return-to-work status.

+ Evaluate near miss capture: near miss report data model (what happened, what could have happened, contributing factors), hazard observation reports, good catch recognition program integration, anonymous reporting capability, near-miss-to-incident ratio tracking (benchmark: 300:1 per Heinrich's triangle, modern target: reporting at least 10:1), hazard classification and prioritization.

+ Map the investigation workflow: initial report submission, supervisor review and fact gathering, investigation team assignment (by severity level), investigation methods (5-Why, fishbone/Ishikawa, fault tree, barrier analysis, SCAT -- Systematic Cause Analysis Technique), corrective action assignment, corrective action tracking to closure, effectiveness verification, management review.

+ Evaluate root cause analysis implementation: RCA methods available in the system (5-Why, fishbone diagram, fault tree analysis, taproot, SCAT), depth of analysis (surface cause vs. contributing cause vs. root cause vs. systemic cause), causal factor categorization (human factors, equipment/design, environmental, management system, organizational), structured vs. free-text RCA entry.

+ Check contributing factor classification: immediate causes (substandard acts, substandard conditions per ANSI Z10), basic causes (personal factors -- capability, knowledge, motivation; job factors -- leadership, engineering, maintenance, procurement, tools), management system failures (policy, training, observation, emergency prep, rules, hazard analysis, investigation quality, PPE management, engineering controls, hiring/placement), organizational factors (safety culture, resource allocation, management commitment).

+ Evaluate corrective action tracking: action categorization by hierarchy of controls (elimination, substitution, engineering controls, administrative controls, PPE -- in priority order per NIOSH), action assignment (responsible person, due date), action status tracking (open, in progress, overdue, completed, verified), effectiveness verification method and timing, recurring corrective action detection (same fix applied repeatedly indicates root cause not addressed).

+ Assess investigation quality: investigation completion rate within target timeframe, RCA depth scoring (did the analysis reach systemic causes or stop at immediate cause), corrective action closure rate, corrective action overdue percentage, management system findings percentage (high-quality investigations find management system gaps, not just blame individuals), investigation training requirements for investigators.

+ Evaluate OSHA 300 log compliance: automatic recordability determination logic (applying 29 CFR 1904 recording criteria), case classification (death, days away from work, restricted work/transfer, other recordable), days away / restricted / transfer counting, establishment-level log maintenance, annual posting requirements (300A summary, February 1 - April 30), five-year retention requirement, electronic submission compliance (for establishments with 250+ employees or high-hazard industries with 20-249).

+ Check recordability determination: work-relatedness assessment (geographic, temporal, and causal connection), general recording criteria (medical treatment beyond first aid, loss of consciousness, restriction of work, days away, significant injury/illness), first aid definition compliance (per 29 CFR 1904.7(a) -- specific list of first aid treatments), special recording criteria (needlesticks, hearing loss, tuberculosis, musculoskeletal disorders), exemptions (voluntary blood donation, common cold/flu, mental illness unless triggered by workplace event).

+ Evaluate incident reporting to OSHA: fatality reporting within 8 hours, inpatient hospitalization/amputation/eye loss reporting within 24 hours, reporting method tracking (online, phone), state plan vs. federal OSHA jurisdiction handling, multi-establishment reporting for companies operating across states.

+ Assess data quality for regulatory compliance: complete and accurate entries (all fields populated per OSHA requirements), consistent classification (same incident type classified the same way across facilities), amendment and correction audit trail, 300 log reconciliation with HR and medical records, mock audit and inspection readiness assessment, prior OSHA citation history tracking and abatement verification.

+ Evaluate lagging metric calculation: Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR = recordable cases x 200,000 / hours worked), DART rate (DART cases x 200,000 / hours worked), Lost Time Incident Rate (LTIR), severity rate (days away x 200,000 / hours worked), fatality rate, workers' compensation costs, EMR (Experience Modification Rate). Check for rate calculation accuracy, industry benchmarking (BLS SOII data), and trend visualization.

+ Assess leading indicator capture: safety observations conducted (target: 2-5 per supervisor per week), hazard reports submitted and resolved, near miss reports (volume and trending), safety training completion rates, inspection and audit completion rates, corrective action on-time closure rate, management safety walks and engagements, JSA/JHA completion for new tasks, PPE compliance audit results, pre-task planning completion.

+ Evaluate predictive capabilities: incident prediction models (correlating leading indicators with future incident rates), seasonal risk patterns (heat illness in summer, slip/falls in winter, fatigue during overtime periods), fatigue risk management (hours worked, shift patterns, time-of-day risk curves), new employee risk period tracking (first 90 days -- highest incident risk period), department and area risk scoring.

+ Check benchmarking capabilities: internal benchmarking (facility vs. facility, department vs. department), external benchmarking (BLS industry average TRIR, DART), contractor safety performance tracking (ISNetworld, Avetta, Veriforce integration), management dashboard and reporting cadence (daily safety flash, weekly metrics, monthly scorecard, quarterly management review), board-level safety reporting.

+ Map integrations: HRIS (employee data, job role, hire date, department), time and attendance (hours worked for rate calculations), workers' compensation (claims data, medical treatment, costs), EHS management platform (Intelex, Enablon, VelocityEHS, Gensuite, SafetyCulture), training and LMS (completion records), contractor management (ISNetworld, Avetta), industrial hygiene (exposure monitoring data), maintenance and CMMS (equipment-related incident correlation).

+ Evaluate reporting culture indicators: time between incident occurrence and report submission (shorter = better culture), near miss reporting rate (higher = better culture), anonymous vs. attributed reporting ratio, employee engagement survey safety questions, retaliation protection (whistleblower and anti-retaliation compliance per OSHA Section 11(c)), just culture implementation (distinguishing human error, at-risk behavior, and reckless behavior in response to incidents).

+ Check alignment with safety management standards: ISO 45001 clause mapping (context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement), ANSI Z10 requirements coverage, OSHA VPP (Voluntary Protection Programs) criteria alignment, management of change (MOC) process for operational changes that affect safety, contractor safety management.

+ ## Incident Tracking Analysis

+ - Write analysis to disk unless the user requests it.

+

+ NEXT STEPS:

+ - "Run `/workplace-risk-scoring` to evaluate hazard assessment methodology feeding incident prevention."

+ - "Run `/safety-compliance` to perform a comprehensive regulatory gap analysis."

+ - "Run `/safety-training` to assess whether training programs address root causes found in incidents."