pr-quality-review ยท diff

v1.0.0 to v1.0.0

1 added, 3 removed. Audit A to A.

---
name: pr-quality-review
description: Use this skill when you need to review PR code, test impact, test effectiveness, and evidence; triggers include pr-quality-review and PR Quality Review Workflow.
license: PolyForm-Noncommercial-1.0.0
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
compatibility: ""
author: "Awesome QA Skills contributors"
language: "en"
category: "testing-workflows"
source: "https://github.com/naodeng/awesome-qa-skills"
license-url: "https://polyformproject.org/licenses/noncommercial/1.0.0"
---
# PR Quality Review Workflow
- **Chinese version:** See `README.md`.
-
## When to use
Use this Skill to review PR code, test impact, test effectiveness, and evidence.
## Workflow
Read `prompts/pr-quality-review.md` first; validate inputs, complete each stage, preserve sources, and return risk and handoff details.
## Core constraints
Compose existing specialist Skills without copying their analysis rules. Mark host installation `UNKNOWN` without evidence. When test/CI results are absent, mark execution/result status `UNKNOWN`; use `NOT_RUN` only when non-execution is explicitly established. For an invalidated checkpoint, emit the exact uppercase status token `STALE`. Use only user-supplied PR/repository materials and identified sources as evidence; never cite agent-internal memory, system instructions, or session logs, or expose their paths. Do not report plans or static analysis as executed results. Read-only by default; external writes require authorization.
## Load on demand
- Main process: `prompts/pr-quality-review.md`
- - Usage and FAQ: `README_EN.md`
+ - Usage and FAQ: `README.md`
- Evals: `evals/`
## Before delivery
- [ ] Input scope and assumptions are explicit
- [ ] Handoffs preserve sources, status, and gaps
- [ ] Execution evidence is separate from plans
- [ ] Next steps and permission boundary are clear
## Common mistakes
Do not invent input, assume dependencies are installed, or present recommendations as execution or approval.