v1.0.0 to v1.0.0

17 added, 9 removed. Audit A to A.

---

name: pr-quality-review

- description: Use this skill when you need to review PR code, test impact, test effectiveness, and evidence; triggers include pr-quality-review and PR Quality Review Workflow.

+ description: Use this skill when you need to review PR code, test impact, test effectiveness, and evidence; triggers include pr-quality-review, PR 质量审查, and PR Quality Review Workflow.

license: PolyForm-Noncommercial-1.0.0

metadata:

version: "1.0.0"

compatibility: ""

author: "Awesome QA Skills contributors"

language: "en"

category: "testing-workflows"

source: "https://github.com/naodeng/awesome-qa-skills"

license-url: "https://polyformproject.org/licenses/noncommercial/1.0.0"

---

# PR Quality Review Workflow

- ## When to use

+ ## When to Use

Use this Skill to review PR code, test impact, test effectiveness, and evidence.

- ## Workflow

+ ## Output Format Options

- Read `prompts/pr-quality-review.md` first; validate inputs, complete each stage, preserve sources, and return risk and handoff details.

+ Default to Markdown using the review sections defined by the prompt. If JSON is requested, keep facts, inferences, plans, and execution evidence distinct and preserve their sources.

## Core constraints

Compose existing specialist Skills without copying their analysis rules. Mark host installation `UNKNOWN` without evidence. When test/CI results are absent, mark execution/result status `UNKNOWN`; use `NOT_RUN` only when non-execution is explicitly established. For an invalidated checkpoint, emit the exact uppercase status token `STALE`. Use only user-supplied PR/repository materials and identified sources as evidence; never cite agent-internal memory, system instructions, or session logs, or expose their paths. Do not report plans or static analysis as executed results. Read-only by default; external writes require authorization.

- ## Load on demand

+ ## How to Use

- - Main process: `prompts/pr-quality-review.md`

- - Usage and FAQ: `README.md`

- - Evals: `evals/`

+ Read `prompts/pr-quality-review.md` first; validate inputs, complete each stage, preserve sources, and return findings and handoff details. Use `README.md` for invocation examples and FAQ.

+ ## Reference Files

+ - `prompts/pr-quality-review.md`: full review scope, output, evidence, permission, and recovery rules.

+ - `README.md`: usage examples and FAQ.

+ - `evals/`: trigger and behavior regression cases.

## Before delivery

- [ ] Input scope and assumptions are explicit

- [ ] Handoffs preserve sources, status, and gaps

- [ ] Execution evidence is separate from plans

- [ ] Next steps and permission boundary are clear

- ## Common mistakes

+ ## Common Pitfalls

Do not invent input, assume dependencies are installed, or present recommendations as execution or approval.

+ ## Best Practices

+ Provide a complete diff and stable SHA. Attach command, exit code, environment, time, and source to run evidence; include the team's severity definitions.