Analyze task dependencies for parallel execution · git:20260213.3d38a21 · 2026-02-13 · sha256 91cd2b0fdfed5a71
Analyze task dependencies for parallel execution git:20260213.3d38a21A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/91cd2b0fdfed5a71.
--- name: Analyze task dependencies for parallel execution description: Parse story markdown to identify task dependencies and parallel execution opportunities. --- # Analyze task dependencies for parallel execution ## Instructions - Read the story markdown file using the Read tool. - Parse all tasks from the "## Tasks" section. - Analyze each task to identify dependencies: - **File dependencies**: Tasks that update/create files that other tasks depend on - **Logical dependencies**: Tasks that must complete before others - **Same-file conflicts**: Tasks that modify the same file cannot run in parallel - **Parallel agents**: Multiple agents of the same type can work in parallel - focus only on technical dependencies - **QA independence**: Test scenario planning tasks depend only on story and can start immediately in parallel with implementation tasks - Group tasks into parallel execution batches using these formats: - `**Sequential tasks X-Y:**` for tasks that need to be implemented sequentially with no prerequisites - `**Sequential tasks X-Y after task Z completes:**` for a sequential chain that depends on one prerequisite task - `**Sequential tasks X-Y after tasks A-B complete:**` for a sequential chain that depends on multiple prerequisite tasks - `**Parallel tasks X-Y:**` for tasks with no dependencies that can start immediately - `**Parallel after task X completes:**` for parallel tasks depending on a single prerequisite task - `**Parallel after tasks X-Y complete:**` for parallel tasks depending on multiple prerequisite tasks - Number tasks sequentially (1, 2, 3...) across all groups - Keep the original task descriptions with their agent assignments and file paths ## Parallelism Strategy When analyzing dependencies, prefer parallelism by default: - Only create sequential dependencies when there's a true code-level dependency (file imports, component usage) - Assume infrastructure and config will be ready at runtime - Group tasks by file conflicts, not by logical workflow order - Maximize the number of tasks that can start immediately - Remember: multiple agents can work simultaneously on different files ## Output Format Present the analysis as a proposed replacement for the "## Tasks" section. Do NOT edit the story file automatically. Ask the user: "Would you like me to update the story file with these grouped tasks?" Only edit the story file if the user confirms. Proposed format: ```markdown ## Tasks **Sequential tasks 1-3:** 1. Use backend-developer subagent to [original task description] 2. Use backend-developer subagent to [original task description] 3. Use backend-developer subagent to [original task description] **Parallel tasks 4-5:** 4. Use backend-developer subagent to [original task description] 5. Use qa-tester subagent to [original task description] **Parallel after task 4 completes:** 6. Use frontend-developer subagent to [original task description] 7. Use frontend-developer subagent to [original task description] **Sequential tasks 8-9 after tasks 6-7 complete:** 8. Use backend-developer subagent to [original task description] 9. Use frontend-developer subagent to [original task description] ``` ## Dependency Detection Rules **Hard Dependencies (must wait):** - Tasks that modify the same file cannot run in parallel (will cause merge conflicts) - File creation must complete before files that import/reference them - Store/state creation must complete before components that consume the store - Component creation must complete before parent components that render them - Server actions must complete before frontend components that call them **Soft Dependencies (can assume will exist at runtime):** - Config values and environment variables can be assumed to exist at runtime - Database schemas/tables can be assumed to exist if mentioned in requirements - API endpoints can be assumed to exist if defined in requirements - Infrastructure (S3 buckets, etc.) can be assumed to exist if initialized separately **Independent Tasks:** - Test scenario planning depends only on story, not implementation - Infrastructure setup (S3 initialization, DB migrations) can run in parallel with code - Config changes can run in parallel with code that uses those configs ## Examples ### Config Dependencies ❌ **Over-sequential (incorrect approach):** ``` Sequential tasks 1-3: 1. Add config value `auth.userId` 2. Add config value `aws.s3.bucket` 3. Implement server action that uses both config values ``` This creates unnecessary waiting - task 3 can be written assuming configs will exist. ✅ **Properly parallel (correct approach):** ``` Sequential tasks 1-2: 1. Add config value `auth.userId` 2. Add config value `aws.s3.bucket` Parallel tasks 3-4: 3. Implement server action that uses both config values 4. Initialize S3 bucket ``` Tasks 1-2 are sequential because they modify the same file. Tasks 3-4 can run in parallel with 1-2 because they assume runtime values will exist. ## Completion This skill is a standalone analysis task. After updating the story file (or if the user declines): - Report that the task dependency analysis is complete. - Do NOT proceed to implementation planning, codebase exploration, or any other workflow phases. - STOP and wait for the user's next instruction. ## Example Inputs - Analyze task dependencies in @path/to/story.md - Show parallel execution plan for @path/to/story.md - What tasks can run in parallel in @path/to/story.md - Group tasks by dependencies in @path/to/story.md