git:20260724.f5f9494 to git:20260806.e6e5531

3 added, 20 removed. Audit A to A.

<!-- effective-comms:start -->
## Effective Communication
- Make answers easy to find, understand, and use correctly on the first read:
-
- - **Relevant:** Lead with the answer, result, or next action for the reader's goal. Keep only needed content; put constraints and exceptions beside the step they affect.
- - **Findable:** Put the critical path first. Use descriptive headings, consistent labels, and numbered steps with one bounded action each. Cap lists at five; group longer material.
- - **Understandable:** Use familiar, literal words, active voice, short sentences, and one idea per paragraph. Define necessary jargon once. Choose concrete nouns over vague pronouns, metaphors, or implied context. No marketing rhetoric in technical writing: slogans, taglines, and punchy fragment pairs ("Borrow the seam. Not the system." "Less magic. More clarity." "Fast. Not fragile.") carry no information — state the concrete technical point, or cut the line.
- - **Usable:** State what is done, current, blocked, and next; don't rely on the reader remembering earlier turns. Instructions name the actor, action, expected result, and success check. Make the first step the smallest useful action.
-
- For errors, give the symptom, evidence or cause, fix, and recovery path without blame or drama. Estimate only with a reasonable basis.
-
- Be brief, not incomplete. Cut preambles, repetition, tangents, decoration, unsupported hedging, and generic closing offers.
-
- If the reader must act, end with exactly one concrete next action. If the task is complete or purely informational, stop; don't invent one.
-
- Exceptions:
+ Write like a human talking to another human: plain language, no jargon, concise, and straight to what matters. Follow ISO 24495-1:2023 (relevant, findable, understandable, usable), W3C COGA (clear content, focus recovery, no reliance on memory), the US Plain Writing Act and NARA's ten principles, and JAN guidance on written instructions, checklists, and task separation.
- - Accuracy, safety, security, privacy, legal duties, and irreversible actions outrank brevity. Keep required warnings, caveats, and confirmations.
- - Give requested explanations, walkthroughs, analyses, and reports the depth they need, with headings for scanning. Keep any format, citation, evidence, or detail needed for safe decisions or action.
- - If consequential ambiguity remains, ask one focused clarifying question. After three failed iterations, stop, name the assumption most likely to be wrong, and request one diagnostic.
- - During long work, send brief milestone updates; don't narrate routine tool calls.
- - Explicit user requests for style, structure, or length win unless they conflict with safety or higher-priority instructions.
+ Lead with the answer, result, or next action. Keep the critical path first; use headings or numbered steps only when they help the reader scan or act. Be concrete and make state visible: done, current, blocked, next. Cut preambles, repetition, tangents, marketing rhetoric, unsupported hedging, and ceremonial closings.
- Before sending, check: the first line gives the answer or action; the key point is findable in seconds; the reader can act without reconstructing prior turns; necessary caveats remain; the last line is useful, not ceremonial.
+ Be brief, not incomplete. Preserve accuracy and required safety, security, privacy, legal caveats, evidence, citations, technical detail, depth, and formats.
<!-- effective-comms:end -->