git:20260920.16e6f97 to git:20260920.2cbc56d

1 added, 1 removed. Audit A to A.

---

name: ansoff-matrix

description: "Generate an Ansoff Matrix analysis mapping growth strategies across market penetration, market development, product development, and diversification. Use when considering growth options, planning market expansion, or evaluating strategic growth paths."

---

## Codex host binding

- Treat references to Claude slash workflows as the equivalently named Codex skill.

- Before delegating to any specialist, read the `great-pm-runtime` skill and the selected packaged role file.

- Treat "invoke", "assign", "delegate", "spawn", and source Agent-tool instructions as a required Codex `spawn_agent` call with that role and a bounded assignment.

- - Set `task_name` to the exact canonical role name from the selected role file; never shorten, paraphrase, or invent specialist names.

+ - For the spawn tool's `task_name` or `agent_name` identifier, replace canonical role-name hyphens with underscores (`query-refiner-pm` → `query_refiner_pm`). Keep canonical names unchanged in prompts, filenames, verdict logs, and user-facing output; this is an internal identifier mapping, not a role rename.

- Store every returned agent identifier. Never call a wait tool until a spawn has returned an identifier, and wait only on identifiers returned by successful spawns.

- If `spawn_agent` is unavailable or a spawn fails, report BLOCKED; do not impersonate the specialist or wait on an empty agent set.

- Resolve bundled paths from the installed GreatPM plugin root.

- Ignore Claude-only model aliases, colors, turn limits, and tool allowlists.

- Preserve GreatPM human gates, governance, state, and reporting contracts.

> **Provenance.** Vendored from `phuryn/pm-skills@ansoff-matrix` (MIT, Paweł Huryn / Product Compass — github.com/phuryn/pm-skills). Adapted into great-pm 2026-05-29 with attribution. Host agent: product-strategist.

# Ansoff Matrix

## Metadata

- **Name**: ansoff-matrix

- **Description**: Generate an Ansoff Matrix analysis mapping growth strategies across market penetration, market development, product development, and diversification.

- **Triggers**: Ansoff matrix, growth matrix, market expansion, growth strategy options

## Instructions

You are a growth strategist analyzing expansion opportunities using the Ansoff Matrix for $ARGUMENTS.

Your task is to evaluate growth options across product and market dimensions and develop specific strategies for each quadrant.

## Input Requirements

- Current product(s) and market definition

- Current market penetration and performance

- Customer insights and market opportunities

- Company capabilities and constraints

- Growth targets and timelines

- Competitive dynamics

## Ansoff Matrix Framework

### 2x2 Matrix: Products vs. Markets

| | Current Market | New Market |

|---|---|---|

| **Current Product** | Market Penetration | Market Development |

| **New Product** | Product Development | Diversification |

---

### 1. Market Penetration (Current Product + Current Market)

Grow revenue by increasing usage or sales in your existing market.

**Strategies:**

- Increase frequency of product usage

- Expand use cases within existing customer base

- Acquire competitors' customers

- Reduce churn and improve retention

- Upsell and cross-sell existing customers

- Lower prices to capture price-sensitive segments

- Increase marketing and brand awareness

- Improve customer experience to drive referrals

**Examples:**

- Netflix adding games to increase engagement

- Starbucks encouraging multiple visits per week

- Adobe expanding Adobe Creative Cloud subscriptions

**Risk Level:** Low (familiar market, product, capabilities)

**Typical Timeline:** 6-12 months

---

### 2. Market Development (Current Product + New Market)

Grow by selling your existing product to new customer segments or geographies.

**Strategies:**

- Expand into new geographies or regions

- Target new customer segments or personas

- Sell through new channels or partnerships

- Adapt product for new use cases

- Partner with complementary companies

- Localize product for new markets

- Build brand awareness in new markets

**Examples:**

- Facebook expanding internationally

- Uber moving into new cities and countries

- Slack selling to non-tech industries

**Risk Level:** Medium (new market dynamics, but proven product)

**Typical Timeline:** 12-24 months

---

### 3. Product Development (New Product + Current Market)

Grow by introducing new products or features to your existing customer base.

**Strategies:**

- Add new features to existing product

- Create adjacent product lines

- Bundle products for greater value

- Develop premium/lite versions

- Integrate adjacent capabilities

- Create complementary products

- Upgrade product experience or performance

**Examples:**

- Spotify adding podcasts

- Amazon Prime expanding services (video, music, grocery)

- Figma adding prototyping and FigJam

**Risk Level:** Medium (existing customers but new product)

**Typical Timeline:** 12-18 months

---

### 4. Diversification (New Product + New Market)

Grow by entering entirely new markets with new products.

**Strategies:**

- Related diversification: leveraging existing competencies

- Unrelated diversification: entering new domains

- Acquire companies in new markets/products

- Strategic partnerships or joint ventures

- Build new business units

- Apply capabilities to adjacent problems

**Examples:**

- Amazon expanding from books to cloud services (AWS)

- Apple expanding from computers to phones, wearables, services

- Microsoft moving from software to cloud (Azure) and gaming (Xbox)

**Risk Level:** High (new market, new product, new capabilities)

**Typical Timeline:** 24+ months, requires significant investment

---

## Output Process

1. Define current market and product clearly

2. Analyze each quadrant:

- Identify 2-3 specific opportunities per quadrant

- Assess market size and growth potential

- Estimate required resources and investment

- Evaluate competitive dynamics

- Define success metrics

3. Prioritize opportunities by:

- Strategic fit with company vision

- Revenue potential and growth rate

- Resource requirements and feasibility

- Competitive advantage and defensibility

- Timeline to profitability

4. Develop go-to-market strategy for top 2-3 opportunities

5. Create phased roadmap and milestones

6. Identify risks and mitigation plans

7. Define success metrics and leading indicators

## Strategic Questions

- Which quadrant offers the best risk-reward profile?

- Where do our capabilities give us competitive advantage?

- Which opportunities align best with our vision and values?

- What partnerships or acquisitions would accelerate growth?

- How does each option impact our brand and positioning?

## Notes

- Market penetration is lowest risk; diversification is highest risk

- Most companies should excel in one quadrant before expanding

- Avoid spreading too thin across all four quadrants simultaneously

- Consider sequential strategy: penetration first, then market development

- Reassess Ansoff Matrix annually or when market conditions shift

## Worked Example — Acme (personal-finance app)

**Current position:** personal expense-tracking app, sold to individual Indian consumers via app stores. ~50k MAU, the product auto-categorizes spending from uploaded bank statements.

|---|---|---|---|

| **Market Penetration** (same product, same market) | Improve categorization accuracy + add bill reminders to lift retention and referrals among existing Indian consumers | Low | **Do first.** Cheapest growth; retention compounds every other quadrant. |

| **Market Development** (same product, new market) | Same app, new segment: small-business owners who need expense tracking for GST; or new geography (Southeast Asia) | Medium | **Second.** Product is proven; the unknown is whether the *new* segment has the same burning pain (validate as a beachhead first). |

| **Product Development** (new product, same market) | New product for the *same* Indian consumers: a savings-goals/investing-nudge feature, or a credit-score tracker | Medium | **Third.** Trusted relationship + existing distribution, but a genuinely new build with its own adoption curve. |

| **Diversification** (new product, new market) | A lending product (BNPL) sold to SMBs — new product *and* new buyer, new regulatory regime, new sales motion | High | **Avoid for now.** This is the diversification trap dressed as ambition. |

**The honest read:** with 50k MAU and unproven retention, Acme belongs almost entirely in **Penetration**. Everything to the right and below is a *future* sequence, not a *parallel* program. A roadmap that puts one bet in all four quadrants this year is the "we're doing all four" failure mode below.

## When NOT to use the Ansoff Matrix

- **Pre-PMF.** If you have not yet won your current product in your current market, "growth options" is the wrong question — Penetration is the only honest quadrant, and the real work is finding fit (see `lean-startup`, `crossing-the-chasm`). Ansoff is a *growth* tool, not a *fit-finding* tool.

- **When the real question is "should this market exist?"** Ansoff assumes you grow within or adjacent to a known market. If you suspect the winning move is to make the competition irrelevant by creating uncontested space, that is a `blue-ocean-strategy` question — Ansoff's four boxes will herd you into existing-market thinking and miss it.

- **For prioritizing features inside one product.** Ansoff is a portfolio/expansion lens, not a backlog-ranking tool. Use `prioritization-methods` (RICE/WSJF) for that.

## Pitfalls / Failure modes

1. **The diversification trap.** Diversification (new product + new market) feels like the most ambitious, "transformational" play, so leaders over-weight it. It is the quadrant with the *highest* failure rate because you are simultaneously learning a new product, a new buyer, a new channel, and often a new regulatory regime — with none of your existing advantages transferring. Most "bold pivots" that die are unforced diversification. Require an explicit answer to "what existing competency actually transfers?" before greenlighting.

2. **"We're doing all four."** A growth deck with one initiative in every quadrant is not a strategy — it is the absence of one. The whole point of Ansoff is *sequencing under finite resources*. Spreading thin guarantees you dominate no quadrant. Force a rank, fund the top one or two, and explicitly defer the rest.

3. **Mislabeling the quadrant to feel safer.** Teams routinely file a genuinely-new product as "Product Development" (medium risk) when the buyer is also new — making it actually Diversification (high risk). The risk label drives the investment case, so an honest quadrant assignment is load-bearing. Test it: *is the buyer the same person/budget as today?* If no, you are at least one column to the right of where you claimed.

4. **Treating "new market" as just a new geography.** A new *segment* in the same geography (consumer → SMB) is often a harder market shift than a new *country* in the same segment, because the job, the buying process, and the willingness-to-pay all change. Don't assume "Market Development" is automatically low-medium risk; size the *behavioral* distance, not the map distance.

5. **Annual-only reassessment in a fast market.** The note says "reassess annually," but a competitor launch, a regulatory change, or a failed quadrant bet should trigger an immediate re-map. A stale Ansoff matrix justifies last year's commitments against this year's reality.

## Cross-links

- **`crossing-the-chasm`** (Geoffrey Moore) — when a quadrant move means reaching a *new* customer type (especially Market Development or Diversification), the chasm between early adopters and the mainstream is the dominant risk. Pair Ansoff's *where to grow* with Crossing the Chasm's *how to cross into that segment*, and pick a **beachhead** (see `beachhead-segment`) inside the new market rather than attacking it broadly.

- **`blue-ocean-strategy`** — Ansoff operates inside *existing* market boundaries (red ocean). When the strongest move is to redraw the boundary and create uncontested demand, Blue Ocean is the complementary lens; use it to pressure-test whether you are competing in a crowded box when you could be making a new one.

- **`porters-five-forces`** — before committing to any new-market quadrant, run Five Forces on that target market's structure; an attractive-looking quadrant can sit in a structurally brutal industry.

- **`prioritization-methods`** — once you have 2-3 candidate moves across quadrants, score them (RICE / WSJF) to make the sequencing decision defensible rather than political.

---

### Further Reading

- [The Product Management Frameworks Compendium + Templates](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/the-product-frameworks-compendium)