research-to-article · git:20261014.c1a6454 · 2026-10-14 · sha256 5894f232d8642b7c
research-to-article git:20261014.c1a6454A
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/5894f232d8642b7c.
--- name: research-to-article description: Turn a topic and public source set into a source-traceable article package with claim mapping, metadata, links, a finished draft, and verification notes. Use when a user asks for a researched article, educational post, analysis, comparison, explainer, source-backed commentary, SEO or answer-focused article, or a publication-ready draft rather than a research brief. --- # Research to Article Build a finished article from current evidence while keeping facts, analysis, recommendations, and unresolved claims visibly separate. ## 1. Define the article contract - Confirm the topic, audience, practical purpose, time window, desired length, publication type, and required point of view. - Identify the intended output: editorial package, full draft, revision, or verification pass. - For video-led articles, identify the primary embed separately from supplemental sources and confirm the editorial date policy. - Use `research-brief-curator` instead when the user wants only a digest, reading queue, or research brief. - Preserve an approved angle unless new evidence makes it inaccurate or misleading. ## 2. Build the source and claim map - Browse current public sources whenever the topic includes facts that may have changed. - Read [references/source-quality.md](references/source-quality.md) before selecting evidence. - Prefer primary sources, official documentation, original research, standards, transcripts, and direct creator material. - Record every material claim with its source, publication date, event date when different, evidence role, and limitations. - Separate sourced fact from analysis, inference, scenario, and recommendation. - Keep conflicting facts visible until a stronger source or explicit qualification resolves them. ## 3. Prepare the editorial package - Use [assets/article-package-template.md](assets/article-package-template.md). - Define the title, practical angle, slug, meta description, audience need, outline, internal-link opportunities, call to action, source credits, and Link Map. - For embeds or visual assets, read [media and date handling](references/media-and-dates.md). Record creator credit, source URL, verified source date, purpose, and permission or usage uncertainty. - Include only sections supported by the source map or clearly labeled as analysis. - Ask for a material editorial decision only when the evidence supports multiple incompatible directions. ## 4. Draft with evidence discipline - Put the useful answer early and explain why the evidence matters. - Cite material claims close to the wording they support. - Attribute preview, reported, estimated, disputed, or creator-tested information precisely. - Keep quotations short, necessary, and attributed. Prefer paraphrase with a direct source link. - Do not invent facts, quotes, statistics, examples presented as real, source access, product behavior, consensus, or outcomes. - Do not turn a single example, testimonial, or small study into a universal claim. ## 5. Verify the article package - Recheck names, dates, links, numerical claims, quotations, credits, title, slug, meta description, and Link Map. - Keep article publication and editorial update dates separate from source/event/video dates. Never backdate to a video date unless an explicit editorial policy requires that treatment, and flag misleading date labels. - Check that explanatory images add information; avoid repeating a video's player thumbnail while retaining separate social-preview assets. - Mark claims that remain `qualified`, `inference`, `unsupported`, or `stale` and revise or hold them. - Confirm the final draft distinguishes fact, analysis, and recommendation. - Report the evidence cutoff date and any source that could not be accessed. ## 6. Respect the publication boundary Return the article package and verification state. Do not publish, modify a website, submit indexing requests, or update an external system. If the user later authorizes website implementation, hand the finished package to the appropriate website workflow and verify the affected surfaces with `website-change-verifier`.