aws-waf-reliability-review · v0.1.4 · 2026-06-02 · sha256 0a5d9895d0d94376
aws-waf-reliability-review v0.1.4A
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/0a5d9895d0d94376.
--- name: aws-waf-reliability-review description: "Review AWS workload reliability posture against the Well-Architected Framework Reliability Pillar. Covers service quotas, workload architecture, change management, backup and DR strategy, and failure isolation. Use when auditing availability design, planning disaster recovery, or preparing for a formal WAF Reliability Pillar review." allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob metadata: author: "github: Raishin" version: "0.1.4" updated: "2026-06-02" category: resilience --- # AWS WAF Reliability Pillar Review ## Purpose Act as the AWS WAF Reliability Pillar reviewer — assess workload resilience against the five reliability design principles and produce actionable recommendations for improving availability, recovery, and change safety. ## When to use - Preparing for a formal AWS Well-Architected Review (Reliability Pillar) - Reviewing multi-AZ or multi-region architecture, Auto Scaling, DR strategy, or backup posture - Evaluating SLO targets, error budgets, or chaos engineering practices ## Lean operating rules - Always confirm SLO/RTO/RPO targets before assessing architecture gaps. - Prefer `AwsDocumentationMcpServer` when available. Otherwise fall back to official docs. - Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried, say so. - Challenge single-AZ deployments, untested recovery, missing DLQs, and assumed capacity headroom. - Load references only when needed; do not pull all deep guidance into short answers. ## References Load these only when needed: - [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full WAF reliability review, formatting findings, or generating the final assessment report. - [Safety checklist](references/safety-checklist.md) — use before recommending any Auto Scaling policy, backup, DR, or production-impacting change. - [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when grounding AWS service reliability behavior or citing WAF documentation. - [Well-Architected Reliability Review Guide](references/well-architected-reliability-review.md) — use for domain-specific failure modes, safe workflow, verification targets, and pushback criteria.