git:20260821.1f2ec6e to git:20260823.dc14c40

---

name: delegate

description: After a plan is approved, break it into self-contained Junior-safe tickets for fresh-session execution and identify Senior-required work that needs stronger judgment. Writes to the tier-resolved delegation queue; model choice remains explicit and user-controlled.

---

Delegation only pays off if each ticket can be executed correctly by a fresh

session that has never seen this conversation and has no access to the reasoning

that produced the plan. Model capability and session separation are different:

a Junior-safe ticket may run on the same, a lighter, or a stronger model, while

Senior-required work must run in the user-selected senior-capability mode.

Fresh-session isolation covers conversation context, not working files. Banka's

safe default is **serial execution in one checkout**: finish and survey one

ticket before another session edits the same working directory. Parallel ticket

execution is allowed only when each session receives a separate Git worktree

and branch, with its results reviewed and merged deliberately. A local or

cloud-hosted model may execute a ticket if its host can read the assigned

project state, edit the assigned checkout/worktree, and run the required

verification; Banka does not launch models or create worktrees itself.

This skill does not write code. It writes tickets. Writing a bad ticket is more expensive than writing no ticket — a bad ticket costs a full fresh-session context load, produces wrong output, and then needs the dredge skill to fix. Take the time to make each one right.

---

## Step 0 — Require an approved plan first

Do not run this skill against an unapproved idea. If the charter skill has not produced a "Blueprint ready" implementation plan for this work, stop and say so:

```

This needs an approved plan first. Invoke the charter skill on this feature,

confirm the plan, then invoke the delegate skill.

```

---

## Step 1 — Split the plan into candidate items

Break the approved implementation plan into the smallest independently-executable units. A unit is independently executable if it can be built, and its correctness checked, without needing any other undone unit to exist first except as a stated dependency.

For each candidate item, determine its **delegation tier**:

**Tier: Junior-safe (eligible for fresh-session delegation)**

- Follows an existing, already-established pattern elsewhere in the codebase

- Touches no file listed under an Absolute Invariant in the project's architecture file

- Has low ambiguity — the plan already resolved the judgment calls, nothing is left to interpret

- Does not touch encryption, auth, payment, or any security/compliance-tagged boundary

**Tier: Senior-required (run only in the user-selected senior-capability mode)**

- Establishes a new pattern for the first time (nothing yet exists to match)

- Touches an Absolute Invariant file or a security/compliance boundary

- Genuinely ambiguous — a judgment call the plan didn't fully resolve

- Cross-cutting — touches multiple systems/files in ways that are easy to get subtly wrong

**Before finalizing the split, check for over-splitting.** "Smallest independently-executable unit" cuts both ways — two candidate items are not actually independent units just because they could technically be described separately. Merge two Junior-safe items into a single ticket when either holds:

- They touch the same file(s)

- One item's `Done when` condition cannot be verified true without the other item already being done — this is the "stated dependency" case from this step's opening paragraph, made concrete

Keep them as separate tickets when either holds instead — the separate survey checkpoint is worth the extra session, not overhead to eliminate:

- Each item's `Done when` condition is independently checkable on its own, with no dependency either direction

- Either item independently qualifies as Senior-required under the tier rules above — never merge a Senior-required item into a Junior-safe one to make it delegable; reclassify the whole merged unit as Senior-required instead

**After merging, re-run tier classification on the combined scope** — don't grandfather a merged ticket's tier in from its pre-merge pieces. Two individually Junior-safe items can merge into something cross-cutting enough to require Senior-required (touching multiple files/systems in a way that's easy to get subtly wrong is already a Senior-required trigger above).

**A merged ticket unions both source items' boundaries, not just one.** Its `Files to touch` and `Files to NOT touch` cover the combined set from both; its `Do not` list carries forward every boundary either item stated. Dropping one item's boundary because the other item's spec became the base is exactly the kind of silent gap this project's checkability standard exists to prevent.

State the tier and a one-line reason for every item, including the Senior-required ones — do not silently drop them from the queue, list them so the user knows what's intentionally being kept back. **State a one-line reason for every merge too**, the same way — "why is this one ticket, not two" should never require reverse-engineering from the merged ticket's shape.

---

## Step 2 — Write each Junior-safe item as a self-contained ticket

A ticket fails if the fresh session would need to ask a question to proceed. Before finalizing a ticket, apply the same checkability standard used everywhere else in this project: could a model with zero conversation memory read this ticket alone and produce the correct result?

Each ticket must include:

```markdown

### Ticket [N]: [short name]

**Tier:** Junior-safe

**Required capability:** Junior-safe or higher; a stronger model may execute this ticket

**Pattern to match:** [exact file/component to copy the shape of — never "follow best practices," always a real pointer]

**Files to touch:** [exact paths]

**Files to NOT touch:** [anything adjacent that must stay untouched]

**Spec:**

[Concrete, complete description — fields, behavior, exact function/handler names to

reuse. No open questions. If a value is needed and no default exists, this ticket

is not ready — resolve the value first or reclassify as Senior-required.]

**Done when:**

[Specific, checkable completion condition — not "it works," but e.g. "form

renders with these 4 fields, save button calls the existing save() handler,

matches BatchForm.tsx spacing and validation pattern."]

**Do not:**

[Explicit boundaries — e.g. "do not modify the encryption module," "do not

add new dependencies without flagging first"]

```

---

## Step 3 — Write the tier-resolved queue

Resolve the project with the schema-2 authority and tier contract before

writing. `AGENTS.md` must contain one valid schema-2 Banka block with these

comments exactly once and in this order:

```markdown

<!-- BANKA:START -->

<!-- BANKA:STATE-SCHEMA: 2 -->

<!-- BANKA:TIER: Minimal -->

<!-- BANKA:END -->

```

The third comment is exactly one of `<!-- BANKA:TIER: Minimal -->`,

`<!-- BANKA:TIER: Core -->`, or `<!-- BANKA:TIER: Standard -->`. Its declared

tier must match the verified filesystem shape, and any present `CLAUDE.md` must

be exactly `@AGENTS.md`.

A matching Minimal shape has neither `/core/` nor `/context/`. Core has

`/core/` and its `overview.md`, `architecture.md`, `design.md`, and

`progress.md`, with no `/context/`. Standard has `/context/` and its

`project-overview.md`, `architecture.md`, `build-plan.md`, `code-standards.md`,

`library-docs.md`, `ui-tokens.md`, `ui-rules.md`, `ui-registry.md`, and

`progress-tracker.md`, with no `/core/`.

Minimal and Core resolve to root

`delegation-queue.md`; Standard resolves to `context/delegation-queue.md`.

Legacy `CLAUDE.md` authority is compatibility-read-only: it may be inspected,

but Delegate must not create or change a queue until the explicit, previewed,

and confirmed migration has completed. Stop rather than choosing a destination

when root authority is missing or broken, Banka metadata competes or is

malformed, both `/core/` and `/context/` exist, or the tier and storage shape

disagree. Create the resolved queue only for active schema 2. Append tickets —

never silently overwrite a queue that already has unstarted or in-progress

items without telling the user what's being replaced.

**Ticket numbers are append-only.** Never renumber or reuse a number already used in this file — not across separate delegate runs, and not when a merge collapses two candidates into one. A stable number is what lets a session-opening handoff point at "Ticket N" unambiguously; a number that can shift meaning defeats that.

For a merged ticket, the one-line spec summary in the checklist below must name both folded-in behaviors, not just the more prominent one — that line is often the only thing a future skim reads without opening the full spec.

```markdown

# Delegation Queue

Generated from: [feature/plan name] — [date]

## Ready for fresh-session execution (Junior-safe)

- [ ] Ticket 1: [name] — [one-line spec summary]

- [ ] Ticket 2: [name] — [one-line spec summary]

## Kept with the current session (Senior-required)

- [item] — [one-line reason]

- [item] — [one-line reason]

## Full ticket specs

[Full ticket blocks from Step 2, one per Junior-safe item]

```

---

## Step 4 — Confirm and hand off

After successfully writing the queue, return the queue result followed by one

complete, ready-to-paste handoff block for every Junior-safe ticket, in

dependency order. Use this one reusable shape exactly; substitute each

bracketed field from the resolved project and its full ticket spec:

```text

Work in [exact project path].

You are executing Ticket [N] from the delegation queue:

[exact queue path]

Use a model meeting Ticket [N]'s [required capability] requirement; the owner

controls that selection outside this handoff. Read the queue introduction,

execution rules, and Ticket [N] only. Do not read or begin another ticket.

Dependency state: [satisfied dependency state, including any accepted

prerequisite outcome].

The coordinator session hands ownership of the shared checkout to this session

for Ticket [N]. No other implementation session is authorized to edit this

checkout until this ticket reports completion and returns ownership.

The accepted dirty baseline is: [exact accepted dirty files and their source,

or "none"]. These changes are accepted dependencies, not evidence of

concurrency. Dirty files, one worktree, absence of .git/index.lock, and

process inspection do not prove or disprove concurrent editing. Stop for an

unexplained changed path; do not stop for the accepted dirty baseline above.

Files to touch: [exact Files to touch field from Ticket N].

Files not to touch: [exact Files not to touch field from Ticket N].

Done when: [exact Done when field from Ticket N].

Verification: [exact Verification field from Ticket N].

Do not: [exact Do not field from Ticket N].

When finished, run every verification command in Ticket [N] and report:

1. files changed;

2. completion against each Done when condition;

3. verification commands and results;

4. any unexpected drift, ambiguity, or remaining risk;

5. that checkout ownership is returned to the coordinator session.

Do not start another ticket. Do not create or switch worktrees unless explicitly

assigned. Do not expand beyond the resolved ticket. Stop only for unexplained

drift, missing authority, an unmet dependency, or a material ambiguity the

ticket does not resolve.

```

For one ready ticket, return one block. For zero, say that all work remains

Senior-required and return no empty handoff prompt. This skill never creates

sessions, selects models, or creates worktrees. In a shared checkout, tickets

run serially; parallel execution requires a separately assigned Git worktree

and branch for each session. After each ticket returns, a senior-capability

coordinator invokes Survey before marking it complete and before another ticket

edits the same shared checkout.

---

## The Rule

A ticket that needs the reader to infer, guess, or ask is not a ticket — it's an unfinished plan wearing a ticket's format. Do the inferring here, while full context is available. Never pass ambiguity downstream to a session that has no way to resolve it except by guessing.