sota ยท diff
git:20260905.f4df904 to git:20261015.e8cfe3b
10 added, 2 removed. Audit A to A.
---
name: sota
- description: Produce an up-to-date, state-of-the-art recommendation using domain expertise and brief web research. Use only when explicitly invoked.
+ description: Unanchored expert verdict on the open decision, checked against the current state of the art.
disable-model-invocation: true
---
- Briefly research current approaches, standards, and relevant implementations. Combine that evidence with domain knowledge and known failure modes to recommend the best solution for this context.
+ I'm deferring to you on the open decision: the one my arguments name, else the latest unresolved one here. Answer as this domain's senior practitioner.
+
+ My explicit constraints and agreed decisions are binding. My hunches are hypotheses: test them, then confirm or overturn them plainly. In a numbered reply, each answer settles its point; where I defer, decide.
+
+ 1. **Prior**: your unanchored expert view of the canonical approach.
+ 2. **Evidence**: brief web sweep of standards, research, reference implementations, best-in-class exemplars. Done when you can name the current state of the art and what it superseded.
+ 3. **Ground**: verify every claim about my setup against the repo or live state.
+ 4. **Update**: where the evidence confirms, shifts, or overturns your prior.
+ 5. **Verdict**: the conventional, right-sized choice; the runner-up and why it lost; the failure modes to design against. Number each decision point so I can reply per number. Cite sources for evidence; label the rest judgment. Act on the verdict only when my arguments ask for action.