git:20260514.2648602 to git:20260701.1f4accc

5 added, 111 removed. Audit B to A.

---
name: ccc-code-review
- description: "\"Review code changes for security, performance, correctness, and maintainability. Use when: 'review code', 'PR review', 'check changes', 'review my diff', 'is this…"
+ description: "Review code changes for security, performance, correctness, and maintainability. Use when: 'review code', 'PR review', 'check changes', 'review my diff', 'is this…"
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Write
- Edit
- Bash
- Glob
- Grep
- Agent
- AskUserQuestion
argument-hint: "<PR URL, file path, or diff>"
---
- # /ccc-code-review
- > Placeholders like ~~source control refer to connected tools. See [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md).
-
- Review code changes with a structured lens across four dimensions: Security, Performance, Correctness, Maintainability. Quick Mode reviews the current diff. Power Mode runs a full 4-dimension scored review.
-
- ## Quick Mode (default)
-
- If an argument is provided (file path, PR URL, or diff), review it immediately.
-
- If no argument, run:
- ```bash
- git diff HEAD~1
- ```
- and review the most recent change. If the working tree has unstaged changes, prefer `git diff` instead.
-
- Highlight:
- - Critical issues (must fix before merge)
- - High issues (should fix)
- - Suggestions (nice to have)
-
- Limit to 20 most important findings. Skip minor style nits unless `--style` flag is passed.
-
- ## Power Mode
-
- Activate by passing `--power` or `detailed`.
-
- Full 4-dimension review with scores (1-10):
-
- ### Security (weight: 35%)
- - SQL injection, XSS, CSRF
- - Authentication and authorization flaws
- - Secrets or credentials in code
- - Input validation gaps
- - SSRF, path traversal, insecure deserialization
-
- ### Performance (weight: 25%)
- - N+1 queries
- - Unnecessary memory allocations
- - Algorithmic complexity (O(n²) in hot paths)
- - Missing indexes or unbounded queries
- - Resource leaks
-
- ### Correctness (weight: 25%)
- - Edge cases (null, empty input, overflow)
- - Race conditions and concurrency
- - Error handling and propagation
- - Off-by-one errors, type safety
-
- ### Maintainability (weight: 15%)
- - Naming clarity and single responsibility
- - Duplication, test coverage
- - Documentation for non-obvious logic
-
- **Overall score** = weighted average. Verdict: Approve (8+) / Request Changes (5-7) / Needs Discussion (<5).
-
- ## Delegating Large Reviews
-
- For reviews >500 lines of changes, use the Agent tool to delegate to the `reviewer` agent:
- - The reviewer agent runs in parallel across sections
- - Synthesizes findings into a single report
- - Catches issues a single pass might miss
-
- ## If Connectors Available
-
- If **~~source control** is connected:
- - Pull PR diff automatically from the URL — no copy-pasting
- - Check CI/test status before reviewing (fail fast on broken CI)
- - Post review comments directly to the PR via the source control MCP
- - Verify the PR addresses its linked issue requirements
-
- If **~~project tracker** is connected:
- - Link Critical/High findings to new bug issues automatically
- - Verify the PR description matches the linked ticket scope
-
- If **~~library docs** (Context7) is connected:
- - Verify API usage against current docs — catches deprecated methods
- - Check imports and signatures against live documentation
-
- If **~~knowledge base** is connected:
- - Check changes against team coding standards and style guides
- - Reference prior ADRs for architectural decisions
-
- ## Output Format
-
- ```markdown
- ## Code Review: [PR title or file]
-
- ### Summary
- [1-2 sentence overview of the changes and overall quality]
-
- ### Issues
- | # | File | Line | Issue | Severity |
- |---|------|------|-------|----------|
- | 1 | auth.ts | 42 | JWT secret read from process.env without fallback | 🔴 Critical |
- | 2 | db.ts | 18 | N+1 query in getUserPosts loop | 🟠 High |
- | 3 | utils.ts | 91 | Magic number 86400 — use a named constant | 🟡 Medium |
-
- ### What Looks Good
- - [Positive observations — acknowledge the good]
-
- ### Verdict
- **[Approve / Request Changes / Needs Discussion]**
- Score: [X/10] (Security: X | Performance: X | Correctness: X | Maintainability: X)
- ```
-
- ## Tips
+ # /ccc-code-review — alias → /ccc-review
- 1. **Provide context** — "This handles PII" or "This is a hot path" focuses the review.
- 2. **Specify focus** — pass `--security` or `--performance` to narrow the lens.
- 3. **Include tests** — I'll check test coverage and quality alongside the implementation.
- 4. **Fix Critical first** — never merge with a Critical issue open, even under time pressure.
+ > **Deduplicated (v6.1).** This skill is now an alias for **/ccc-review** — the canonical review workflow — branch audit, security/perf/correctness, and specialist-agent dispatch (covers diff review).
+ >
+ > Invoke /ccc-review instead. This stub is kept so the `/ccc-code-review` command still resolves and prior references do not break.