glyph · diff

v2.0.0 to v2.0.0

5 added, 2 removed. Audit A to A.

---
name: glyph
license: MIT
compatibility: "Claude Code 2.1.220+."
description: "Render an answer as ASCII art plus semantic emojis inline, right now, with no setup questions. Use for a fast visual take on status, comparisons, trade-offs, architecture, or any ad-hoc 'show me X visually' ask. For a full multi-artifact plan playground, use visualize-plan instead."
tags: [ascii, diagrams, visualization, box-drawing, terminal, quick]
version: 2.0.0
author: OrchestKit
user-invocable: true
disable-model-invocation: false
context: inherit
allowed-tools: [Read, Grep, Glob]
argument-hint: "[topic-to-render]"
complexity: low
persuasion-type: reference
effort: low
metadata:
category: document-asset-creation
---
# Glyph
Render the answer as ASCII art plus semantic emojis, inline, immediately. All output renders in a monospace terminal with no external tools.
**Core principle:** Encode information into structure, not decoration. Every diagram element should communicate something meaningful.
## Execution (run this, do not ask first)
The whole point is speed, so there is no setup phase.
**With no argument, the topic is the current conversation.** Measured over a real 13-prompt session: zero asks supplied a self-contained topic, and the one direct invocation passed nothing at all. `/ork:glyph` on its own means "render where we are right now" — the open work, the decision just reached, the state of the thing being discussed. Render that; do not ask what to draw.
Given a topic (or the conversation, when none is given):
1. **Render immediately.** Do NOT call `AskUserQuestion` to pick a format, do NOT call `TaskCreate`, do NOT spawn an `Agent`. Choose the form yourself from the topic shape and draw it. Asking first defeats the skill.
2. **Pick the form from the shape of the data**, using the pattern library below:
| Topic shape | Form |
|---|---|
| state / progress / health | status box + bar meters |
| A vs B, options, trade-offs | comparison table or side-by-side boxes |
| steps, pipeline, hand-offs | left-to-right flow with `──▶` |
| containment, layers, layout | nested boxes / tree |
| ranked list, scores, counts | table + bar meters |
| over time | sparkline or milestone track |
3. **Emit inline in the reply.** Never write a file unless the user asked for one. This is a chat answer, not an artifact.
4. **Use the 12-emoji semantic set and box-drawing vocabulary** defined in `rules/visual-style.md` (shipped with this skill). Semantic, never decorative: an emoji must mean something (✅ pass, ❌ fail, ⚠️ risk, 🔴 blocked).
- 5. **Lead with the answer.** The visual comes first; prose after it only if it adds something the diagram cannot carry.
- 6. **Stay honest.** If a number is unknown, print `?` rather than inventing one. A confident-looking chart built on guesses is worse than prose.
+ 5. **Stay inside the budget: ≤ 12 visual lines, and ≤ 40% of the reply.** Block count within that is free — two 5-line blocks are fine, four 10-line blocks are not. This skill renders on request, it does not render without limit (#3558). Full derivation of the numbers is in `rules/visual-style.md`.
+ 6. **State the point in prose first**, in one or two sentences, then show the visual. The visual supports the answer; it is never the answer. If the reader has to parse a diagram to find out what happened, the reply failed.
+ 7. **Stay honest.** If a number is unknown, print `?` rather than inventing one. A confident-looking chart built on guesses is worse than prose.
**When NOT to use this skill:** if the deliverable is a multi-section HTML playground, a persisted plan artifact, or anything needing file output, use `visualize-plan` instead. Glyph is the cheap inline path; visualize-plan is the full pipeline.
+
+ **Over budget is the same signal.** If the honest rendering needs more than ~12 lines, that is not a bigger chat answer, it is a different deliverable: write the playground or file and print the path. The old escape hatch fired on artifact TYPE only, so a 40-line inline reply never tripped it.
## Box-Drawing Character Reference
This block intentionally shows multiple sets together as a key. Authors
should use ONE set per real diagram; the `single-set` lint rule enforces
this on production diagrams.
<!-- ascii-lint-disable: single-set,single-arrow-style,density-min -->
```
default: ┌─┐ │ └─┘ ├─┤ ┬ ┴ ┼
emphasis: ┏━┓ ┃ ┗━┛ ┣━┫ ┳ ┻ ╋
title: ╔═╗ ║ ╚═╝ ╠═╣ ╦ ╩ ╬
soft: ╭─╮ │ ╰─╯
portable: +-+ | +-+ +-+ + + +
Arrows: → ← ↑ ↓ ─> <─ ──> <──
Blocks: █ ▓ ░ ▏▎▍▌▋▊▉
Status: ● ○ ✓ ✗ ⚠ ◆ ◇ ▶ ▷ ↑↓→ ▓▒░ (closed-set vocab — see rules)
```
### Set Conventions (D8: intent-driven naming)
Tokens live in `tokens.json`. Names describe USE not APPEARANCE.
| Set | Characters | Use For |
|-----|-----------|---------|
| `default` `─│` | Normal boxes and connectors | Most diagrams |
| `emphasis` `━┃` | Headers, focus, draw the eye | Key components, outer frames |
| `title` `═║` | Document titles | §0-style banners only |
| `soft` `╭╮╰╯ ─│` | Status cards, ambient UI | Diff blocks |
| `portable` `+-\|` | NO_COLOR / CI / bare TTY | Fallback |
Rename codemod (D8): old `light/heavy/double/rounded/ascii-fallback` → new names above. Old names accepted with warning for one minor release.
### Status Glyph Vocabulary
Closed-set v1 of 11 semantic glyphs (`●○✓✗⚠◆◇▶▷ ↑↓→ ▓▒░`). Single source of truth — see `rules/status-glyph-vocabulary.md`. Add-a-glyph process in `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Diagram Patterns
### Architecture Diagrams
```
┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ Frontend │─────>│ Backend │
│ React 19 │ │ FastAPI │
└──────────────┘ └───────┬──────┘
v
┌──────────────┐
│ PostgreSQL │
└──────────────┘
```
### File Trees with Annotations
```
src/
├── api/
│ ├── routes.py [M] +45 -12 !! high-traffic path
│ └── schemas.py [M] +20 -5
├── services/
│ └── billing.py [A] +180 ** new file
└── tests/
└── test_billing.py [A] +120 ** new file
Legend: [A]dd [M]odify [D]elete !! Risk ** New
```
### Progress Bars
```
[████████░░] 80% Complete
+ Design (2 days)
+ Backend (5 days)
~ Frontend (3 days)
- Testing (pending)
```
### Swimlane / Timeline Diagrams
```
Backend ===[Schema]======[API]===========================[Deploy]====>
| | ^
| +------blocks------+ |
| | |
Frontend ------[Wait]--------[Components]=======[Integration]=+
=== Active work --- Blocked/waiting | Dependency
```
### Blast Radius (Concentric Rings)
```
Ring 3: Tests (8 files)
+-------------------------------+
| Ring 2: Transitive (5) |
| +------------------------+ |
| | Ring 1: Direct (3) | |
| | +--------------+ | |
| | | CHANGED FILE | | |
| | +--------------+ | |
| +------------------------+ |
+-------------------------------+
```
### Comparison Tables
```
BEFORE AFTER
┌────────────┐ ┌────────────┐
│ Monolith │ │ Service A │──┐
│ (all-in-1)│ └────────────┘ │ ┌──────────┐
└────────────┘ ┌────────────┐ ├─>│ Shared │
│ Service B │──┘ │ Queue │
└────────────┘ └──────────┘
```
### Reversibility Timeline
```
Phase 1 [================] FULLY REVERSIBLE (add column)
Phase 2 [================] FULLY REVERSIBLE (new endpoint)
Phase 3 [============....] PARTIALLY (backfill)
--- POINT OF NO RETURN ---
Phase 4 [........????????] IRREVERSIBLE (drop column)
```
## Key Rules
| Rule | Description |
|------|-------------|
| Font | Always monospace — box-drawing requires fixed-width |
| Weight | Standard for normal, Heavy for emphasis, Double for titles |
| Arrows | `─>`, `──>`, or `│` with `v`/`^` for direction |
| Alignment | Right-pad labels to match column widths |
| Annotations | `!!` for risk, `**` for new, `[A/M/D]` for change type |
| Width | Keep under 80 chars for terminal compatibility |
| Nesting | Max 3 levels of box nesting before readability degrades |
## When to Use Each Pattern
| Pattern | Use Case |
|---------|----------|
| Layered boxes | System architecture, deployment topology |
| Concentric rings | Blast radius, impact analysis |
| Timeline bars | Reversibility, migration phases |
| Swimlanes | Execution order, parallel work streams |
| Annotated trees | File change manifests, directory structures |
| Comparison tables | Cross-layer consistency, before/after |
| Progress bars | Status tracking, completion metrics |
## Related Skills
- `brainstorm` — Design exploration where diagrams communicate ideas
- `architecture-patterns` — System architecture that benefits from ASCII diagrams
- `code-review-playbook` — Review comments with inline diagrams