v1.0.0 to v1.0.0

---

name: debate-review

display-name: Debate Review

description: Multi-agent debate code review with configurable perspectives (performance, security, maintainability)

version: 1.0.0

category: code-review

user-invocable: true

tags:

[

debate,

review,

code-review,

multi-agent,

security,

performance,

maintainability,

]

capabilities:

[

multi-perspective-review,

consensus-voting,

structured-feedback,

decision-recording,

]

tools:

- file_reader

- code_reviewer

instructions: |

Use this skill when the user wants a thorough code review from multiple perspectives.

Spawns 3 reviewer agents (performance, security, maintainability) by default,

each producing structured issues with severity ratings. Results are merged via

consensus voting to produce APPROVE, NEEDS_WORK, or REJECT verdict.

Usage: /debate-review <file-or-diff> [--perspectives perf,security,maintain]

examples:

- input: "/debate-review src/main/index.js"

output: "3 reviewers analyzed index.js: APPROVE (consensus: 0.85)"

- input: "/debate-review src/main/auth/sso-manager.js --perspectives security,performance"

output: "2 reviewers analyzed sso-manager.js: NEEDS_WORK (2 critical, 5 warnings)"

os: [win32, darwin, linux]

author: ChainlessChain

handler: ./handler.js

---

# Debate Review

## Description

Multi-agent debate code review that spawns multiple specialized reviewer agents, each analyzing code from a different perspective. Results are aggregated via consensus voting.

## Usage

```

/debate-review <file-or-diff> [--perspectives perf,security,maintain]

```

## Perspectives

| Perspective | Focus Areas |

| --------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- |

| performance | Time/space complexity, memory leaks, I/O bottlenecks, caching |

| security | Input validation, injection, OWASP Top 10, data exposure |

| maintainability | Readability, DRY, SRP, error handling, test implications |

## Output Format

```

Debate Review Report

====================

Target: src/main/auth/sso-manager.js

Perspectives: performance, security, maintainability

| Reviewer | Vote | Critical | Warning | Info |

| --------------- | ---------- | -------- | ------- | ---- |

| performance | APPROVE | 0 | 1 | 2 |

| security | NEEDS_WORK | 1 | 3 | 0 |

| maintainability | APPROVE | 0 | 0 | 4 |

Verdict: NEEDS_WORK (consensus: 0.70)

```

## Verdict Scale

- **APPROVE** - Average score >= 0.7, no critical issues

- **NEEDS_WORK** - Average score 0.4-0.7, issues to address

- **REJECT** - Average score < 0.4, critical issues found