code-plan · diff
git:20260809.c3a06fb to git:20260811.6b9321d
5 added, 5 removed. Audit A to A.
---
name: code-plan
- description: Design a feature before writing code. Spawns planner + skeptic subagents that read the Memory Bank, argue, and write a plan to swarm-report/. Use BEFORE /build, for any feature touching 2+ files or with unclear scope. Skip for typos and one-line fixes.
+ description: Design a feature before writing code. Spawns planner + skeptic subagents that read the Memory Bank, argue, and write a plan to swarm-report/. Use BEFORE /code-build, for any feature touching 2+ files or with unclear scope. Skip for typos and one-line fixes.
---
- # Skill: /plan
+ # Skill: /code-plan
You are the ORCHESTRATOR. You do not design the plan yourself — you run two subagents
and merge their output. No code edits here.
## Invocation
- `/plan "<one-sentence feature>"`
+ `/code-plan "<one-sentence feature>"`
## Steps
1. **Slugify** the feature → `<slug>` (kebab-case, short).
2. **Read context yourself** (cheap, keeps subagents focused): `.memory-bank/index.md`
if it exists. If it does not, tell the user: "No Memory Bank found — plan will rest
only on your description." and continue.
3. **Spawn 2 subagents in parallel** — one message, two `Task` calls,
`subagent_type: general-purpose`. Prefix EACH prompt with:
> Answer TERSE: terse, drop filler, keep all technical substance.
- **planner** — "Read `.claude/agents/planner.md` and follow it exactly. Feature: <verbatim>."
- **skeptic** — "Read `.claude/agents/skeptic.md` and follow it exactly. Feature: <verbatim>."
(Sharper, slightly pricier variant: run planner first, then pass its YAML into the
skeptic prompt so it critiques the concrete plan. One extra round-trip. Use it when
the feature is risky.)
4. **Merge** (orchestrator only): take the planner's plan, apply the skeptic's HIGH/MED
fixes, and list anything unresolved under **Blockers**.
5. **Write** `swarm-report/<slug>-plan.md`:
```
# Plan: <feature> (slug: <slug>)
## TL;DR
- ## Acceptance criteria — observable "done" conditions; /review checks these
+ ## Acceptance criteria — observable "done" conditions; /code-review checks these
## Plan — merged steps + affected files + tests
## Blockers — skeptic HIGH not yet resolved (human decides)
## Out of scope
## Assumptions
```
6. **Report to user**: TL;DR + any Blockers. If Blockers exist, ask the user to resolve
- them before `/build`.
+ them before `/code-build`.