automate-me · git:20261028.933dd9d · 2026-10-28 · sha256 d29fea8d00d16570
automate-me git:20261028.933dd9dA
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/d29fea8d00d16570.
--- name: automate-me description: "Capture explicitly requested working preferences in a reusable local skill, using the current conversation or user-selected examples." --- # Automate me Follow the consuming project's instructions and requested scope; use the [portable defaults](../orbyn-workflow/references/project-policy.md) only where guidance is missing. Locate an existing skill for the requested workflow before creating one. Use only the conversation or records the user selected; do not mine unrelated sessions. Distinguish explicit preferences from inferred patterns and one-off constraints. Preserve useful defaults, tool permissions, task scope and existing authorization. Use the available skill-authoring guidance, concise descriptions and references loaded only when needed. Prefer a small edit over another overlapping mode skill. Choose a repository path for shared conventions and a personal path only when requested. Do not change global models, memory, connectors or schedules as a side effect. Show the resulting file and the preferences it encodes. ## Preference → maintained owner If the user repeatedly requests export readback, place that check in the export owner when they ask to encode it. Preserve what the preference actually covers: a PDF readback rule should not require application builds for a prose edit. Return the changed owner and an example of when it should not activate. ## Operational method Use the [local operating method](references/operating-method.md) for the execution sequence, concrete failure case, expected result and stopping condition. It is Orbyn-authored guidance; historical source notices remain in provenance. For conflicting selected examples, prefer an explicit current choice over old inference, retain contradictory evidence and label weak confidence. One temporary platform exception does not establish a general preference. A repeated explicit correction can support a minimal scoped owner edit; missing artifact evidence or unresolved conflict can justify no change. No automatic historical corpus mining.