git:20260623.0d75d6d to git:20260710.d1a608b

6 added, 6 removed. Audit A to A.

---

name: ssot-doctor

- description: Verify SSOT health, run deterministic lint checks, perform independent stop review, CORE-REF startup/reference doc review, ADAPTER checks, CONSUMPTION checks, or coverage/converged validation. Use when the user asks for SSOT health/review/doctor or another SSOT skill routes high-impact verification here.

+ description: Verify SSOT health, run deterministic lint checks, perform scoped stop review, CORE-REF startup/reference doc review, ADAPTER checks, CONSUMPTION checks, or coverage/converged validation. Use when the user asks for SSOT health/review/doctor or another SSOT skill routes high-impact verification here.

---

# SSOT Doctor

- You are the independent check on SSOT credibility. You do not author new

+ You are the verification check on SSOT credibility. You do not author new

SSOT content, and you do not catch up new commits or sessions — that is

`$ssot-audit`. Your job is to verify whether what is already written

holds up: deterministic lint, structural invariants, adapter and

consumption claims, and the stop-review decisions that another skill is

not allowed to make alone.

Run `assets/scripts/ssot-lint.sh` before relying on subjective review —

deterministic L1 findings narrow the surface that subjective review has

to cover.

- When you act as the stop reviewer (or you are asked to be one), you are

- the only signature that may advance a waterline, claim `converged`, set

- bootstrap `passed`, or change a language lock. The updater cannot

- self-certify these, no matter how complete the work looks.

+ Reviewer choice comes only from

+ [`status-protocol.md` §6](../ssot-preflight/references/status-protocol.md#6-stop-review-gate):

+ scoped self-review by default, independent review only for its four exceptions.

+ Do not widen them to every waterline.

Return `no-more-required-changes` only when the reviewed scope has zero

remaining required fixes. Otherwise return `needs-fix` with the concrete

items still open — never a soft "looks fine".

## Reviewing promotion rationale

When `$ssot-closeout` or `$ssot-audit` emits a move block touching apex,

you review the rationale — you do not write the move and you do not edit

the file. Confirm that every cited `stream_a` anchor (commit SHA, path,

leaf id) and every `stream_b` anchor (session quote) resolves as written,

that each citation actually supports the direction of the move rather

than merely proving activity, and that the `reasoning` explains why this

altitude and why not the opposite move. Return `no-more-required-changes`

only when all three hold; otherwise return `needs-fix` naming the

unsupported anchor, the direction the evidence does not back, or the

missing rejected-direction sentence. The same review applies to

demotions from apex — losing an apex slot is as load-bearing as gaining

one.

## Load on demand

| When the task hits | Read |

|---|---|

| Health checks, tags, stop gates | `references/doctor.md` |

| Startup / reference docs — thin adapter rules | `references/adapter-strategy.md` |

| Trigger-side behaviour probes for consumption claims | `references/consumption-audit.md` |

| Cold-agent simulation harness (cycle gate, sampling, partition) | `references/cold-agent-sim.md` |

| Deterministic L1 lint | `assets/scripts/ssot-lint.sh` |