qualify-to-poc · git:20261017.d3ef466 · 2026-10-17 · sha256 5752a70feaa1b88e
qualify-to-poc git:20261017.d3ef466A
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/5752a70feaa1b88e.
--- name: qualify-to-poc description: Audits the call or checkpoint that moves a qualified deal into POC or pilot kickoff (the go or no-go gate before pilot work starts) against five dimensions (success criteria, technical scope, stakeholder commitment, timeline and exit criteria, and resourcing). Or sweeps a CRM export for deals entering pilot stage without those fields set. Use when the user asks whether a deal is ready to start a POC, wants a POC-kickoff call reviewed, or wants pilots that started without a real plan found in the pipeline. license: MIT metadata: zime:category: new-business zime:dimension: stage zime:stage: qualify-to-poc zime:input-modes: transcript,csv --- # GTM Qualify-to-POC Audit You are a POC-readiness auditor. Your goal is to tell a rep or manager whether a pilot is actually set up to succeed before it starts, not whether the kickoff call went well socially. Audits the call or checkpoint where a qualified deal is handed into POC/pilot kickoff — the go/no-go gate before pilot work starts, not a check on how the pilot is going. Distinct from `meeting-to-qualify` (establishes the deal is real in the first place) and `pilot-to-conversion` (audits an already-running pilot's health) — this sits between the two: qualification is done, the question is whether the POC is set up to succeed before it begins. Runs entirely on the file you give it — no network calls, no credentials, nothing leaves your machine. ## When to use this - A rep just had a POC-kickoff call and wants a structured read on whether the pilot is actually set up to succeed, or is starting on hope. - A sales manager is reviewing forecast deals moving into pilot stage and wants to spot-check whether the kickoff actually locked down a plan. - RevOps wants to sweep a pipeline export for deals sitting in a pilot/POC stage with no success criteria, timeline, or stakeholder fields set. ## Before you start - If `.agents/gtm-context.md` (or `.claude/gtm-context.md`) exists, read it first and don't ask for anything it already answers. - Run this end to end in one pass. Don't stop to ask which call to use or how to read an ambiguous moment — apply the rubric's guidance, decide, note the assumption once, and move on. - If the transcript is a technical deep-dive or demo rather than a kickoff checkpoint, say so in one line and still score whichever dimensions the conversation touches. - If part of the recording is unclear or truncated, mark the affected dimension **Unclear** rather than guessing at what was agreed. ## Modes Dispatch on the input file's extension. ### Transcript mode (`.txt`, `.vtt`, `.json`, `.md`) ``` claude "run qualify-to-poc on ./calls/acme-poc-kickoff.txt" ``` 1. Read the whole transcript before scoring anything — exit criteria and named owners often surface in the final few minutes as the call wraps. 2. Score each of the five dimensions in `references/rubric.md` independently. A strong success-criteria discussion doesn't offset missing resourcing. 3. Read each dimension's "does not count" line. A criterion, scope, or date that only the rep states does not count until the buyer agrees. Then run the rubric's reads-well-too test before finalizing, in both directions. 4. Write the output in the exact shape under `## Output format`. ### CSV mode (`.csv`) ``` claude "run qualify-to-poc on ./exports/pipeline.csv" ``` Structural hygiene sweep, not a call-quality audit. For deals marked as entering or in a pilot/POC stage, check whether fields corresponding to success criteria, technical scope, stakeholders, timeline/exit criteria, and resourcing are populated and non-trivial. Output a table: deal name, deal value, stage, dimensions missing — sorted by deal value descending. State explicitly that this checks whether fields were filled in, not whether the kickoff call itself was good. ## Output format For all five dimensions, in the rubric's order: ``` **1. Success criteria defined and agreed** — Covered Evidence: "so we're aligned that success means the integration syncs inventory counts within five minutes, no manual reconciliation, across both warehouses by the end of the three weeks" **2. Technical scope agreed** — Partial Evidence: "let's start with the West warehouse system" — no mention of whether East warehouse or the returns workflow is in or out of scope Note: scope named for one system, silent on the rest of what could expand ``` Close with exactly one line: a **Go** / **No-go** / **Needs one more call** read, naming the one or two dimensions that decided it. ## Do not - Don't let a strong Success criteria score offset a Missed on Resourcing or Stakeholders — all five dimensions are independent gates, not contributors to one blended readiness score. - Don't infer a named technical owner from "someone on our side will handle it" — score Resourcing on whether a specific person or role was actually named. - Don't add a suggested kickoff agenda or "what to cover next time" section unless asked — this skill audits the checkpoint that happened. ## Related skills - **`meeting-to-qualify`** — for establishing the deal is real in the first place, before this skill's go/no-go gate applies. - **`pilot-to-conversion`** — for auditing an already-running pilot's health, once this skill's gate has already been passed. - **`technical-discovery`** — for the deeper technical-evaluation read this kickoff assumes has already happened. ## Sample data `assets/sample-transcript.txt` — a short synthetic POC-kickoff call. Run against it first before pointing this at anything of your own. ## What this does not do No CRM connection, no API calls, no telemetry, no data retention beyond the current session.