brand-audit · git:20260823.f8dbcee · 2026-08-23 · sha256 9ac556408c5cb93d
brand-audit git:20260823.f8dbceeA
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/9ac556408c5cb93d.
--- model_tier: inherit name: brand-audit description: "Audit how a brand is currently expressed across touchpoints and flag drift from its defined tokens, voice, and strategy. Use to inventory and critique an existing brand before changing it." domain: engineering personas: - brand-strategist workspaces: - engineering packs: - brand trust: level: professional install: removable: true scope: write: [] verification_reason: "execution declares no handler, so this skill runs nothing of its own — every write is the calling agent's, under the rules that govern it. No command can prove a scope the skill never executes." execution: type: manual --- # brand-audit Method skill. Inventories current brand expression across touchpoints and flags drift against defined brand tokens, voice, and strategy. For the UI surface it leans on `existing-ui-audit` rather than re-implementing component inventory. Output is a drift findings list — not a redesign. ## When to use - Before a rebrand or brand refresh — establish the baseline first. - When auditing brand consistency across touchpoints (web, decks, docs, ads, copy). - To create an evidence base before running `brand-strategy`. - When "is this on-brand?" needs a systematic answer across many assets, not a gut call. ## Procedure 1. **Gather the source of truth.** Collect the consumer brand's defined tokens (palette, type scale, logo rules), voice profile, and strategy doc if they exist. Consumer brand definition is authoritative; corpus defaults are gap-fill only. 2. **Inventory current expression per touchpoint.** Cover logo usage, colour palette, typography, voice/copy tone, imagery style, and iconography across the relevant surfaces (site, app, decks, marketing, docs). 3. **UI surface.** Invoke `existing-ui-audit` for UI component inventory. Do not re-implement it here — take its output as an input to this audit. 4. **Compare observed vs. defined.** For each touchpoint value, check it against the matching token or voice rule. 5. **Classify each finding.** Three buckets: `on-brand` (matches the defined token), `drift` (observed value diverges from the token), `undefined` (no token exists to audit against — this is a governance gap, not automatically wrong). 6. **Rank drift findings** by visibility (how prominent the touchpoint is) multiplied by frequency (how often it appears). Surface the top items first. 7. **Verify completeness.** Confirm every inventoried touchpoint is classified (`on-brand` / `drift` / `undefined`) — the audit is complete only when the classified count equals the inventoried count, and `existing-ui-audit` has run for every in-scope UI surface. Ensure each drift finding cites BOTH the defined value and the observed value; a finding missing either side is not yet verified. 8. **Output the findings list** (see Output format). Do not redesign or author replacements — hand drift findings to `brand-identity` or `brand-strategy`. ## Output format 1. **Source-of-truth summary** — what brand tokens, voice rules, and strategy exist and where they were found (or "none defined" if absent). 2. **Drift findings** — table-style list: `touchpoint | defined value | observed value | severity (high/medium/low)`. 3. **Undefined gaps** — values with no token to check against; listed separately so they can feed a token-creation pass. 4. **Ranked top drift** — ordered list of the highest-severity drift items to fix first, with a one-line rationale per item. ## Do NOT - Redesign or author replacement assets — that is `brand-identity` work, not audit work. - Re-implement UI component inventory — call `existing-ui-audit` and consume its output. - Invent a "correct" value where none is defined — mark the finding `undefined` and surface it as a governance gap. - Treat corpus defaults as the consumer's source of truth — consumer brand definition always wins. ## Gotcha - `undefined` is a real finding. A value with no token to check against is a governance gap that deserves its own section, not a pass. - Drift severity is visibility times frequency, not personal taste. A rarely-seen off-palette icon ranks lower than a wrong primary colour used on every page header. - Consumer brand tokens outrank any corpus default. If the consumer has defined a token, audit against that; ignore what the corpus suggests. ## See also - [`existing-ui-audit`](../existing-ui-audit/SKILL.md) — the UI-surface inventory this skill reuses. - [`brand-strategy`](../brand-strategy/SKILL.md) — where drift findings feed a refreshed strategy. - [`brand-identity`](../brand-identity/SKILL.md) — defines the tokens audited against. - [`brand`](../brand/SKILL.md) — the corpus of brand defaults (gap-fill only).