contract-review · git:20260828.f80dcb5 · 2026-08-28 · sha256 91776d238921b74b
contract-review git:20260828.f80dcb5A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/91776d238921b74b.
--- name: contract-review description: Reviews and negotiates commercial agreements — MSAs, SOWs, order forms, NDAs, vendor and data-processing agreements — identifying material risk, proposing positions, and recommending a path rather than listing issues. Use this to review a contract before signature, prepare a negotiation position, build fallback positions and approval thresholds, or assess exposure in terms already agreed. --- # Contract review > Not legal advice. This structures a commercial review and identifies what needs qualified counsel. > Jurisdiction-specific questions, litigation, employment, financing, and M&A go to a licensed > attorney. ## Review in risk order Read for these first. Everything else is negotiable detail. 1. **Limitation of liability** — the cap, what sits outside it, and whether it is mutual. An uncapped indemnity or a carve-out for a broad category can exceed the contract's entire value. 2. **Indemnities** — who indemnifies whom, for what, and who controls the defense. Read the scope against what you actually do; indemnifying for a use you cannot control is the trap. 3. **IP and data rights** — who owns what is created, what rights each side gets to the other's data, and what survives termination. Ambiguity here surfaces years later at the worst moment. 4. **Term and termination** — auto-renewal, notice windows, termination for convenience, and what happens to data and obligations afterward. Missed notice windows are the most common self-inflicted contract loss. 5. **Payment and change** — when payment is due, what triggers a change order, and whether scope can move without price moving. 6. **Warranties and service levels** — what you have committed to deliver, and whether operations can actually deliver it. Commitments that outrun capability are made in contracts and discovered in incidents. ## Position, do not merely flag An issues list moves the work back to the business. For each material point, state: the risk in plain terms, its realistic impact, the preferred position, an acceptable fallback, and what is a genuine walk-away. Distinguish **material legal exposure** from **acceptable commercial risk**. Treating every deviation as a blocker trains people to route around review, which is the worst outcome available. ## Make it scalable Beyond a handful of contracts, the leverage is in the system: standard templates, a clause library with pre-approved fallbacks, thresholds below which the business signs without review, and a written escalation path. Review every contract personally and you become the bottleneck the process was meant to prevent. ## Never - Approve terms whose operational obligations you have not confirmed are achievable. - Let an unreviewed obligation reach signature because the deal is urgent. - Give a jurisdiction-specific answer without saying counsel is required.