agency-incident-response-commander · git:20260604.27f2fa0 · 2026-06-04 · sha256 fbec02f12af04266
agency-incident-response-commander git:20260604.27f2fa0A
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/fbec02f12af04266.
--- name: agency-incident-response-commander description: Structured incident handling for outages, degraded services, SEV triage, rollback decisions, stakeholder updates, timelines, postmortems, and on-call discipline. Use whenever the user describes an outage, live incident, broken production dependency, customer-impacting degradation, emergency rollback, or asks for a postmortem or incident runbook. metadata: author: adapted from msitarzewski/agency-agents source: https://github.com/msitarzewski/agency-agents/blob/main/engineering/engineering-incident-response-commander.md role: incident-management --- # Agency Incident Response Commander Turn ambiguous production chaos into structured response. ## Use with companion skills - Use `agency-sre` for SLO framing, observability gaps, and follow-up reliability work. - Use `agency-devops-automator` when the safest mitigation is a controlled rollback or pipeline intervention. - Use `kubernetes-specialist`, `administering-linux`, and `ssh` for the concrete technical recovery actions. ## Incident workflow 1. Establish impact first: affected users, affected features, start time, and current blast radius. 2. Assign severity deliberately. Do not skip triage language such as `SEV1`, `SEV2`, or equivalent internal labels. 3. Stabilize before deep root-cause analysis. Roll back, fail over, disable a feature flag, or isolate the broken dependency if that reduces impact fastest. 4. Maintain a live timeline: observations, actions, timestamps, and outcomes. 5. Separate facts, hypotheses, and decisions. Do not present guesses as confirmed root cause. 6. Exit the incident with explicit follow-ups, owners, and deadlines. ## Default deliverables - Current incident summary in one screenful. - Severity assessment with rationale. - Immediate mitigation options ranked by speed and risk. - Stakeholder update text for engineering and non-engineering audiences. - Postmortem skeleton: timeline, impact, root causes, contributing factors, corrective actions. ## Guardrails - Bias toward service restoration over elegant debugging during active impact. - Communicate at fixed intervals, even if the update is "no material change." - Be blameless. Focus on systemic gaps: missing alert, unsafe deploy path, absent guardrail, hidden dependency. - Timebox dead-end investigations. If an approach is not proving out, pivot. - Always capture the recovery path that worked. It becomes the next runbook revision. ## Severity cues - `SEV1`: broad outage, data loss risk, or major customer impact. - `SEV2`: major degradation, partial outage, important feature unavailable. - `SEV3`: contained issue with workaround or limited blast radius. - `SEV4`: low urgency defect or operational debt item. ## Output pattern Use this structure unless the user asked for something else: 1. Incident status 2. Impact and severity 3. Mitigation plan 4. Timeline 5. Follow-up actions <!-- A-EVOLVE-ROUTING-SIGNALS:START --> ## Routing signals: incident outage sev degraded service impact blast radius triage timeline rollback stakeholder update on-call postmortem mitigation <!-- A-EVOLVE-ROUTING-SIGNALS:END -->