insights · diff
git:20260726.e930c69 to git:20260802.51da35e
22 added, 3 removed. Audit A to A.
---
name: insights
description: Use when turning the reports/manifests other workbench tools emit into a queryable lineage graph + common metrics store, or when querying/comparing metrics, tracing artifact lineage, or building a run dashboard.
---
# Insights (Lineage & Metrics backbone)
Insights is the connective tissue that makes workflow runs legible. It turns the
structured reports/manifests other tools already emit into a queryable **lineage
graph + common metrics store** — the foundation for dashboards and an
orchestrating agent. It does not replace any tool; it aggregates them.
## Three-access pattern
Source of truth is the FastAPI service
(`npa/src/npa/workbench/insights/service.py`). The CLI
(`npa/src/npa/cli/workbench/insights.py`) and SDK
(`npa/src/npa/sdk/workbench/insights.py`) are thin clients. Do not duplicate
logic across layers.
## Store layout
The store is an **append-only index on S3** under a configurable prefix
(`--output-path`), with a JSONL fallback so it works without any database:
- `records.jsonl` — metric records (`npa.insights.metric_record.v1`).
- `edges.jsonl` — lineage edges (`npa.insights.lineage_edge.v1`).
+ - `records.d/` and `edges.d/` — immutable append shards, one object per write.
+ Every append writes a **new shard object**; readers concatenate the base object
+ (legacy stores) plus all shards. Never rewrite a whole JSONL object to append:
+ object storage has no native append, so read-modify-write silently drops rows
+ when two writers overlap (both read N, both write N + their own).
+
Do NOT introduce a database service or hardcode a metadata backend. Reuse the
**LanceDB** tool as the optional query index (HTTP seam in `integrations.py`),
exactly as `dataset` does; absence degrades to the JSONL scan.
## Interfaces
CLI:
```bash
npa workbench insights record --input-path <records.json> --output-path <store>
npa workbench insights ingest-run --input-path <run-prefix> --output-path <store>
npa workbench insights query --input-path <store> --tool <t> --metric-name <m>
npa workbench insights lineage --input-path <store> --uri <artifact>
npa workbench insights compare --input-path <store> --base-run <a> --candidate-run <b>
npa workbench insights dashboard --input-path <store> --output-path <s3>
npa workbench insights status --input-path <store>
npa workbench insights system-info
npa workbench insights list
```
Endpoints: `/health`, `/status`, `/system-info`, `/list`, `POST /record`,
`POST /ingest-run`, `GET /lineage`, `GET /query`, `GET /compare`,
`GET /dashboard`.
## API contract
- `POST /record`: append one or more metric emissions (+ lineage edges) keyed by
run id + lineage refs. Rows validate against `npa.insights.metric_record.v1`.
- `POST /ingest-run`: **non-invasive ingestion** — scan an S3 run prefix for
known schemas (`npa.dataset.manifest.v1`, `npa.dataset.validation_report.v1`,
`npa.scenario_gen.adversarial_set.v1`, and gate/threshold decision JSONs),
extract their metrics + provenance, and write them into the store. This does
NOT require modifying the emitting tools.
- `GET /lineage`: traverse the provenance graph (ancestors + descendants) for an
artifact/version, reconstructed from recorded `lineage_edge` records.
- `GET /query`: query metric records by facet (workflow, run id, tool, stage,
dataset/model version, metric name, time range, threshold predicate).
- `GET /compare`: cross-run/cross-stack comparison; emits
`npa.insights.comparison.v1` (per-metric delta + regressed/improved flags).
Metrics whose name looks failure-like (corruption/latency/loss/…) are treated
as lower-is-better; override with `--lower-is-better`.
- `GET /dashboard`: return `npa.insights.dashboard.v1` (grouped metrics +
latest-run rollup) and optionally write a self-contained static HTML report to
`--output-path`. Keep viz thin — JSON + a single-file HTML, no web UI.
## Lineage
Thread and preserve lineage that already exists in upstream manifests (input
URIs, dataset/checkpoint versions, parent versions, produced_from/derived_from/
evaluated_on relations). The whole point is cross-tool traceability — do not
drop it.
## GPU routing
CPU-only. Aggregation, query, comparison, lineage, and dashboard need no GPU and
no rendering path (headless).
## Workflows
SkyPilot stays the execution engine, but the shown catalog is npa.workflow-only
(no raw SkyPilot task YAMLs). All insights pipelines are declarative
`npa.workflow/v0.0.1` specs, CPU-only and `cloud: kubernetes`:
- Aggregate a run (ingest-run -> dashboard):
`npa/workflows/workbench/npa-workflows/insights-aggregate.yaml`
- Hardening with insights (hardening stages -> ingest-run -> dashboard):
`npa/workflows/workbench/npa-workflows/hardening-with-insights.yaml`
- CPU-only smoke (ingest fixture -> compare -> dashboard):
`npa/workflows/workbench/npa-workflows/insights-smoke.yaml`
toolRefs: `workbench.insights.record`, `workbench.insights.ingest_run`,
`workbench.insights.compare`, `workbench.insights.dashboard`.
## Known issues
- - Object storage has no native append; the JSONL store is read-then-rewritten on
- each write. It stays logically append-only (records are never mutated).
+ - Object storage has no native append, so each write lands in its own immutable
+ shard under `records.d/` / `edges.d/` and reads concatenate base + shards. This
+ is what makes concurrent ingests safe; a store is never rewritten in place.
+ - **Reader version skew:** a reader older than sharding sees only the base object
+ and silently reports a truncated store (e.g. an agent VM answering "no runs
+ found" for runs that did ingest). Re-bootstrap deployed agents
+ (`npa agent bootstrap --project <alias> --name agent`) after upgrading the
+ store writers.
- `compare` needs both run ids present in the store; comparing a run to itself
- reports every metric as unchanged (useful as a smoke self-check).
+ reports every metric as unchanged (useful as a smoke self-check). A `compare`
+ that fails with `no metrics recorded for base run` right after a successful
+ ingest means the base run's rows are missing from the store, not that the run
+ never ingested — check for rows dropped by a writer that rewrote the object.
+ - A `gpus` metric only exists when an ingested `npa.workflow.run.v1` manifest has
+ a step whose `resources_profile.accelerators` parses to >= 1, and manifests with
+ status `planned` are skipped. CPU-only and never-executed runs therefore report
+ no GPU count at all rather than a fabricated zero.