review · diff

git:20260805.8df4e34 to git:20260809.a4882b4

12 added, 21 removed. Audit A to A.

---
name: review
description: Top-level, user-facing code-review workflow for verified issues in specific files, functions, diffs, or code sections. Use when the user directly requests a review and may need to adjudicate its findings. Do not use as an orchestrator for a delegated leaf review or finding-validation task.
---
# Code Review
- > Documented in depth: [Most AI code reviews are noise. Here's how to fix that.](https://photostructure.com/coding/claude-code-review/)
-
- Review the mentioned code for potential issues and improvements.
-
## Leaf-mode guard
If the task identifies your role as `leaf-reviewer` or sets
`delegation-budget: 0`, read and follow
[`references/single-pass.md`](./references/single-pass.md), complete one review
yourself, return the report to the caller, and stop.
## Run the review
- Read both references and follow them:
-
- - [`references/single-pass.md`](./references/single-pass.md) — the review method:
- scope, what to look for, verification discipline, exclusions, and the fields
- every finding must carry, plus the required LAND, REVISE, or DISCARD verdict.
- - [`references/orchestration.md`](./references/orchestration.md) — the top-level
- rules: what to study first, the two-leaf delegation bound, and how to present
- findings for the user to adjudicate.
+ Read and follow [`references/single-pass.md`](./references/single-pass.md), then
+ [`references/orchestration.md`](./references/orchestration.md). The latter's
+ user-facing response rules replace the former's leaf return behavior.
## Adapting for your project
- - Replace "the project's coding standards and design principles" in
- `references/orchestration.md` with explicit paths (`AGENTS.md`, optional
- `CLAUDE.md`, `docs/DESIGN-PRINCIPLES.md`).
- - Add project-specific "what to look for" items to `references/single-pass.md`
- (e.g. "new public APIs have rate limiting", "DB queries use parameterized
- inputs", "error messages don't leak internal paths").
- - Tune the exclusion list in `references/single-pass.md` if your team *does* want
- style or refactor feedback. The default is strict because noise is the bigger
- problem.
+ - **Name your standards explicitly** in
+ [`references/single-pass.md`](./references/single-pass.md) — `AGENTS.md`,
+ optional `CLAUDE.md`, `docs/DESIGN-PRINCIPLES.md` — in place of the generic
+ "relevant design documents".
+ - **Add project-specific "what to look for" items** to the same file, e.g. "new
+ public APIs have rate limiting", "DB queries use parameterized inputs", "error
+ messages don't leak internal paths".
+ - **Tune the exclusion list** there if your team *does* want style or refactor
+ feedback. The default is strict because noise is the bigger problem.