yolo-training ยท diff
git:20260804.20eb63f to git:20260804.a859519
23 added, 26 removed. Audit A to A.
---
name: yolo-training
description: This skill should be used when user asks to "improve my mAP", "why is my model overfitting", "my training is diverging", "read my results.csv", "interpret my training curves", "my AP50 is good but AP50-95 is bad", "my recall is low", "how do I pick learning rate", "which augmentations should I use", "should I use a bigger model", "tune hyperparameters", or asks how to train YOLO26 for detection, instance or semantic segmentation, pose, OBB, classification, or depth.
---
# YOLO26 training
- Read the run before changing anything. Most requests for "better accuracy" arrive with a
- `results.csv` and confusion matrix that already name the problem.
+ Read the run before changing anything. The `results.csv` and confusion matrix usually name the
+ problem already.
## Order of operations
- Ordered by cost to try, cheapest first, not by size of the potential win. The last two are the
- ones people reach for first and they are the two that spend real budget.
+ Ordered by cost to try, cheapest first, not by size of the potential win.
1. **Epochs and schedule.** Undertrained looks like every other problem, and it costs nothing
but time to rule out.
- 2. **Augmentation.** The lever for the generalization gap, at no extra compute per epoch.
+ 2. **Augmentation.** The knob for the generalization gap, at no extra compute per epoch.
3. **Loss weights and LR.** Cheap, and the curves usually say which one is wrong.
4. **Model size.** Scale up when train loss is still falling at the end of the schedule and the
- train and val curves sit close together. That is the signature of underfitting, and the only
- one a bigger model reliably fixes.
+ train and val curves sit close together. That is underfitting, and it is the only case a
+ bigger model reliably fixes.
5. **Resolution.** Compute scales with the square of `imgsz`, so 640 to 1280 is roughly 4x the
- training budget. Pretrained weights also transfer worse the further you move from the size
- they were trained at, so a large jump is a new training budget, not a free knob. Justify it
- with the object sizes in your data, not as a default first move.
- 6. **Data**, label quality and class balance. The highest ceiling and the slowest to move, and
- the package ships no dataset-analysis tooling, so any audit here is your own script plus
- looking at images. Worth it once the cheap knobs are spent and the curves say the model is
- not the limit.
+ training budget, and pretrained weights transfer worse the further you move from the size
+ they were fit at. Justify it with the object sizes in your data, not as a default first move.
+ 6. **Data**, label quality and class balance. The highest ceiling and the slowest to move. The
+ package ships no dataset-analysis tooling, so any audit here is your own script plus looking
+ at images. Worth it once the cheap knobs are spent.
## Diagnostic loop
```python
import pandas as pd
df = pd.read_csv("runs/detect/train/results.csv")
df.columns = df.columns.str.strip()
print(df.tail(10)[["epoch", "train/box_loss", "val/box_loss", "metrics/mAP50(B)", "metrics/mAP50-95(B)"]])
print("best epoch:", df["metrics/mAP50-95(B)"].idxmax(), "of", len(df))
```
Then read, in this order:
| Read | Question it answers |
| ------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------- |
| best epoch vs total epochs | undertrained, overtrained, or right |
| train loss vs val loss trend | which side of the generalization gap |
| mAP50 vs mAP50-95 | classification and recall vs localization |
| P vs R at the operating point | over-suppression vs over-firing |
| per-class AP spread | one broken class or a general weakness |
| confusion matrix background row and column | false positives vs missed detections |
`references/diagnostics.md` maps each pattern to a cause and a knob, and lists what to rule
out before turning that knob. Read it before recommending a change.
`references/task-notes.md` covers detect, segment, semantic, pose, obb, classify, and depth
specifics.
- ## Things that silently override your settings
+ ## Defaults that will surprise you
- These produce "I changed X and nothing happened", and each one is real in current defaults.
+ These produce "I changed X and nothing happened". All six are current defaults.
- 1. **`optimizer=auto` ignores `lr0` and `momentum`.** It is the default. It picks
- `MuSGD` at lr 0.01 when total iterations exceed 10000, otherwise `AdamW` at
- `0.002 * 5 / (4 + nc)`, and forces `warmup_bias_lr=0`. Setting `lr0` while leaving
+ 1. **`optimizer=auto` ignores `lr0` and `momentum`.** It is the default. It picks `MuSGD` at
+ lr 0.01 when `ceil(len(dataset) / max(batch, nbs)) * epochs` exceeds 10000, otherwise `AdamW`
+ at `0.002 * 5 / (4 + nc)`, and forces `warmup_bias_lr=0`. Crossing that iteration count
+ silently changes optimizer between two runs you meant to compare. Setting `lr0` while leaving
`optimizer=auto` does nothing. Set `optimizer=AdamW` or `optimizer=SGD` explicitly first.
2. **`nbs=64` normalizes the loss, so batch does not scale LR the way you assume.** Below 64 the
trainer accumulates gradients to an effective 64. Dropping batch 64 to 16 changes almost
nothing about the effective step.
3. **`close_mosaic=10` turns off mosaic for the last 10 epochs.** The late jump in mAP is that
switch, not convergence. On a 20-epoch run it is half the schedule, and on a 10-epoch run
mosaic never runs at all.
4. **Fitness for detect is mAP50-95 alone**, weights `[0, 0, 0, 1]`. `best.pt` and `patience`
ignore precision, recall, and mAP50 completely. Segment and pose sum both heads, classify
uses `(top1 + top5) / 2`, semantic uses mIoU. A run whose precision is climbing while
mAP50-95 is flat will still early-stop.
5. **`max_det=300`** truncates validation on dense scenes. Above roughly 300 objects per image
your recall ceiling is an artifact.
- 6. **YOLO26 `end2end` models do their own NMS-free decoding**, so `iou` and `agnostic_nms`
- have no effect on them.
+ 6. **YOLO26 `end2end` models decode without NMS**, so `iou` does nothing on them. `agnostic_nms`
+ still applies, the predictor passes it into the head, so only the IoU threshold is dead.
## Starting recipe
Fine-tuning a pretrained checkpoint on a normal custom dataset:
```bash
yolo train model=yolo26s.pt data=my-data.yaml epochs=200 imgsz=640 batch=16 \
optimizer=AdamW lr0=0.001 lrf=0.01 cos_lr=True warmup_epochs=3 \
patience=50 close_mosaic=20
```
- Deviate on evidence from the charts, one axis at a time. Reasons this differs from the shipped
- defaults: `epochs=100` is short for a small dataset, `patience=100` never fires inside 100
- epochs so it is not real early stopping, and `close_mosaic=10` is too short a clean tail once
- epochs rise.
+ Deviate on evidence from the charts, one axis at a time. It differs from the shipped defaults
+ because `epochs=100` is short for a small dataset, `patience=100` never fires inside 100 epochs,
+ and `close_mosaic=10` is too short a clean tail once epochs rise.
Change one thing per run and keep `seed` fixed. Run-to-run noise on a small dataset is often
0.5 to 1.0 mAP, so a 0.3 mAP "improvement" from a single run is not a result. Confirm anything
- smaller than about 1 point across two or three seeds before believing it.
+ under about 1 point across three seeds.