long-term-user-memory · git:20260728.fac4544 · 2026-07-28 · sha256 ea823214dca8c263
long-term-user-memory git:20260728.fac4544A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/ea823214dca8c263.
--- name: long-term-user-memory description: Persist facts about a user across sessions with provenance, correction, and expiry, so an assistant improves rather than accumulating stale assumptions. Use when an assistant should remember a user between conversations. --- # Long-term user memory Memory across sessions makes an assistant feel personal and makes its errors persistent. A wrong fact learned once is repeated for months, which is why writing memory needs more discipline than reading it. ## Method 1. **Store one fact per record with its source.** What was learned, when, and from which conversation, because a fact you cannot trace cannot be assessed later. 2. **Write sparingly and deliberately.** Stable, reusable facts only. Recording every passing detail produces a memory that is mostly noise (see data-minimization). 3. **Distinguish stated from inferred.** A preference the user articulated is far stronger than one deduced from behaviour, and they should not be treated alike. 4. **Retrieve by relevance to the current task.** Injecting the entire memory into every prompt wastes context and dilutes attention (see context-compression). 5. **Let users see, edit, and delete.** Memory the user cannot inspect is both a trust problem and a compliance one (see subject-access-requests). 6. **Expire what goes stale.** Project details, current employer, and circumstances change, so records need review dates rather than permanence (see memory-forgetting-policy). 7. **Resolve contradictions on write.** New information that conflicts with a stored fact should update rather than coexist, or retrieval returns both and the model picks arbitrarily. ## Boundaries Memory is personal data with consent, retention, and erasure obligations (see pii-handling). Inferred facts can be wrong and sensitive, and inferring protected characteristics is a serious harm even when accurate. Memory improves relevance; it cannot substitute for asking when something matters.