adapt ยท v5.0.0 ยท 2026-09-15 ยท sha256 1272f61af04e9c0f
adapt v5.0.0A
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/1272f61af04e9c0f.
---
name: adapt
description: Use when Adapt designs across breakpoints, devices, platform constraints, touch vs mouse input, and container queries. Use when making a UI responsive or optimizing for mobile/tablet.
version: 5.0.0
last-updated: 2026-09-13
skills:
- mobile-design
- building-native-ui
- tailwind-patterns
tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
scripts-binding:
- .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
- .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
---
# Adapt โ Responsive Adaptation & Container Queries
## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `adapt` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
## Activation Boundaries
- **Activate when:** Use when Adapt designs across breakpoints, devices, platform constraints, touch vs mouse input, and container queries. Use when making a UI responsive or optimizing for mobile/tablet.
- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `adapt` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
## ๐ Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
| :--------- | :--------------- | :------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
---
## ๐ ๏ธ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
---
---
## 4 Adaptation Mechanics
### 1. Container Queries (`@container`) over Viewport Media Queries (`@media`)
- Components should adapt based on their parent container's width, NOT the global browser window size:
```css
.card-container {
container-type: inline-size;
}
@container (min-width: 400px) {
.card-layout {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 120px 1fr;
}
}
```
### 2. Touch Target Sizing (Min 44x44px)
- Interactive targets on mobile/touch interfaces MUST maintain a minimum tap target size of `44x44px` (or `48x48px` for Android), even if the visual icon is smaller (`16px`).
### 3. Drawer on Mobile -> Modal on Desktop
- Complex popovers or dialogs on mobile screens should render as bottom sheets (drawers) with drag-to-dismiss handles, automatically morphing into centered modals on desktop viewports ($\ge 768\text{px}$).
### 4. Fluid Typography & Spacing
- Use `clamp()` for fluid scaling without abrupt media query jumps:
$$\text{FontSize} = \text{clamp}(1\text{rem}, 0.8\text{rem} + 1\text{vw}, 1.75\text{rem})$$
---
## ๐จ Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
| :------------------------------------- | :--------------------------------------------------- | :------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
---
## ๐ค LLM-Specific Traps Table
| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
| :--------------------------------- | :------------------------------------------------------------------------ | :----------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Hallucinated Tool Capabilities** | Assuming an external library or CLI command exists without verification | Run a verification check or verify package.json before referencing tools |
| **Premature Completion Claim** | Declaring a task finished because code was generated without verification | Execute tests, linters, or terminal commands to provide concrete proof |
| **Context Bloat Dumping** | Pasting entire multi-thousand-line files into prompt context | Extract targeted excerpts, symbols, and signatures to preserve tokens |
---
## ๐๏ธ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
**Active Reviewers:** `orchestrator` ยท `agent-organizer` ยท `logic-reviewer`
**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
### โ
Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
```
โ
Did I deconstruct the root objective before proposing architecture?
โ
Did I identify dependencies, bottlenecks, and parallelizable sub-tasks?
โ
Did I avoid over-engineering and select the simplest effective pattern?
โ
Did I verify assumptions with concrete file reads instead of speculation?
โ
Did I establish measurable verification criteria before completion?
```
### ๐ Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
- โ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
- โ
**Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.