accessibility-testing · v1.0.0 · 2026-10-29 · sha256 539cf6a9e1e631c5
accessibility-testing v1.0.0A
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/539cf6a9e1e631c5.
--- name: accessibility-testing description: Use this skill when you need to design accessibility testing against WCAG, keyboard navigation, and assistive technology scenarios; triggers include accessibility testing and a11y testing. license: PolyForm-Noncommercial-1.0.0 metadata: version: "1.0.0" compatibility: "" author: "Awesome QA Skills contributors" language: "en" category: "testing-types" source: "https://github.com/naodeng/awesome-qa-skills" license-url: "https://polyformproject.org/licenses/noncommercial/1.0.0" --- # Accessibility Testing (English) **Chinese version:** See the corresponding Chinese skill. ## When to Use - Need help with accessibility testing in a real project context. - Need an output that can be used directly for execution, review, or follow-up. ## Workflow 1. Read and follow the main prompt listed under Progressive disclosure (coverage, structure, quality bar). 2. Add only project context that changes the result: scope, environment, constraints, risks, dependencies, expected deliverable. 3. If input is incomplete, return a usable first draft and explicitly mark assumptions and gaps. 4. Default to Markdown; switch formats only when the user asks. ## Domain Execution Essentials 1. Record the project-supplied WCAG version/level, scope, and success criterion IDs. Missing targets stay open; never choose a level or claim conformance by default. 2. Build criterion ID | user task/state | input/assistive technology/version | steps | evidence type | outcome. Keep automated scan, keyboard, screen-reader, and manual visual evidence separate. 3. Exercise keyboard navigation, opening, operation, closing, and focus restoration. Check screen-reader name/role/state and dynamic announcements. Prioritize inaccessible critical actions by user impact. 4. A scan with zero findings establishes only the scanned result. Preserve manual FAIL and unexecuted NOT_RUN; aggregate evidence by criterion without promoting a partial scan to conformance. ## Core Constraints - Prioritize by risk / business impact — do not treat everything equally. - Separate confirmed facts from current assumptions. - Do not invent endpoints, fields, environments, or root causes the user did not provide. - Keep output executable: concrete scenarios, clear priority, clear next steps. ## Progressive Disclosure - When calibrating domain outcomes, valid controls, or evidence gaps, read [references/domain-decision-example.md](references/domain-decision-example.md) for sanitized input, per-item oracles, and reproducible calculations. - Before producing output, read and follow `prompts/accessibility-testing.md` (minimum coverage, output structure, quality bar). - When Excel/CSV/JSON/Word is requested: read `output-formats.md` and honor the format. - When a ready-made template fits: use matching files under `output-templates/`. - For deep framework/troubleshoot/schema notes: read only the relevant file(s) under `references/`, do not load the whole directory. - For format conversion or helper checks: prefer existing `scripts/` over reinventing. - For evaluating/regressing this skill: use `evals/` with skill-up. ## Pre-delivery Checklist - [ ] Followed the main prompt's output structure - [ ] Minimum coverage focus: scope and target users, keyboard access, focus order and visible focus, screen reader semantics and labels, headings and landmarks, form errors and validation feedback, color contrast and non-color cues, images, icons, and alternative text, ... (details in main prompt) - [ ] Covered the minimum checklist, or explained omissions - [ ] High-risk items have explicit priority - [ ] Did not invent details the user did not provide - [ ] Assumptions and gaps are marked ## Common Pitfalls - Do not pretend completeness when scope/context is missing. - Do not treat every item as equally important. - Do not skip assumptions and information gaps. - Do not dump generic theory unrelated to the current toolchain.