skill-author · git:20260907.863840e · 2026-09-07 · sha256 ee702d142c4dce52
skill-author git:20260907.863840eA
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/ee702d142c4dce52.
--- name: skill-author description: Author and structure practical Robium skills without unnecessary context or ceremony. --- # Skill author Treat every loaded line as a cost. A skill earns that cost by changing an ordinary coding agent's decision. ## Start with the trigger - Give the skill one clear job and a short name that matches its directory. - Write a brief description that says what the skill helps accomplish and distinguishes it from its closest neighbors. - Do not turn the description into a keyword inventory. Test realistic user requests when the boundary is uncertain. - If an existing skill already owns the decision, deepen it instead of adding another trigger surface. ## Write the entrypoint - Frontmatter contains only `name` and `description`. - Organize `SKILL.md` around one useful mental model, not a universal template. - Prefer short, natural bullets that a human can scan without decoding process language. - Assume the agent can already code, search a repository, and read ordinary documentation. Keep only constraints, choices, and failure patterns that materially improve its work. - Avoid fixed sequences unless order protects correctness, safety, money, or external state. - Mention another skill only where evidence crosses that skill's boundary. ## Put depth behind links - Keep the common path in `SKILL.md`. Put conditional commands, failure diagnosis, tuning, platform compatibility, schemas, and substantial examples in focused supporting files. - Link each supporting file at the point where it becomes useful and say when to read it. Do not load every reference by default. - Reuse a focused existing file before creating another layer of navigation. - Preserve exact Robium-observed values with their measured conditions. They are evidence, not universal defaults. - Use current official documentation for volatile APIs, flags, packages, and configuration. Do not copy a manual into the skill. - Keep executable helpers only when deterministic reuse justifies maintaining code; keep examples only when they show something prose cannot. ## Test usefulness - Read [QUALITY.md](QUALITY.md) for the review bar and mechanical checks. - Run `uv run skills/skill-author/scripts/validate_skills.py` after skill changes. It checks the lightweight contract, not writing quality. - For description, routing, or behavioral changes, review one common request, one likely failure, and one neighboring request that should route elsewhere. A typo or source-link refresh needs only the relevant mechanical check. - Prefer observable behavior checks over tests that assert headings or exact prose. Keep `evals.yaml` only when a real routing or task regression is worth preserving. ## Done - The entrypoint is small enough to load routinely. - Optional detail is discoverable without being injected into every task. - Every strong claim is either stable, sourced upstream, or tied to observed conditions. - There is no version field, changelog, README, or format-only section.