nw-quality-validation · git:20260320.d98f3cb · 2026-03-20 · sha256 59fb8a28ea83eba7
nw-quality-validation git:20260320.d98f3cbA
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/59fb8a28ea83eba7.
--- name: nw-quality-validation description: Type-specific validation checklists, six quality characteristics, and quality gate thresholds for documentation assessment user-invocable: false disable-model-invocation: true --- # Quality Validation ## Six Quality Characteristics - **Accuracy**: Factually correct, technically sound, current | Validation: expert review, automated testing - **Completeness**: All necessary info present for doc type | Validation: checklist, gap analysis - **Clarity**: Easy to understand, logical flow, appropriate level | Validation: Flesch 70-80 - **Consistency**: Uniform terminology, formatting, structure | Validation: style guide compliance - **Correctness**: Proper grammar, spelling, punctuation | Validation: automated check, zero errors - **Usability**: User achieves goal efficiently | Validation: task success, DIVIO type purpose served ## Quality Gate Thresholds | Metric | Threshold | |--------|-----------| | Readability (Flesch) | 70-80 | | Spelling errors | 0 | | Broken links | 0 | | Style compliance | 95%+ | | Type purity | 80%+ single type | ## Type-Specific Validation Checklists ### Tutorial Checklist - [ ] Completable without external references | [ ] Steps numbered and sequential - [ ] Each step has verifiable outcome | [ ] No assumed prior knowledge | [ ] Builds confidence ### How-to Checklist - [ ] Clear goal stated upfront | [ ] Assumes fundamentals known - [ ] Single task focus | [ ] Ends with completion indicator | [ ] No basics teaching ### Reference Checklist - [ ] All parameters documented | [ ] Return values specified - [ ] Error conditions listed | [ ] Examples per entry | [ ] No narrative ### Explanation Checklist - [ ] Addresses "why" not "what" | [ ] Provides context and reasoning - [ ] Discusses alternatives | [ ] No task steps | [ ] Builds conceptual model ## Verdict Criteria - **approved**: Passes all type-specific validation, no collapse violations, meets quality gates - **needs-revision**: Minor issues fixable in place (clarity, missing examples, small gaps) - **restructure-required**: Collapse detected requiring split, or fundamental type mismatch