factory-judge · git:20260902.1ed3131 · 2026-09-02 · sha256 e0e4b950bf667c9d

factory-judge git:20260902.1ed3131A

Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/e0e4b950bf667c9d.

---
name: factory-judge
description: Judge a pull request as an independent reader who did not write it.
argument-hint: the pull request, e.g. `gh:pr:14`
---

# factory-judge

**The instructions for this step live in `.archon/workflows/factory/validate/commands/judge.md`. Read that file now and follow it.**
This skill exists so you can run the step by hand; it deliberately does not restate
the content, because a second copy is a second thing to keep true.

Two adjustments for running it interactively rather than as a workflow node:

1. **`$ARTIFACTS_DIR` does not exist here.** Where the file asks for an input from
   that directory, get the same thing from the repository: `MISSION.md`,
   `FACTORY_RULES.md` and `CLAUDE.md` are at the root, the issue is
   `gh issue view <n>`, and anything a previous step wrote is wherever you put it.
2. **The line telling you to defer to a `piv-*` skill is for the workflow node, not
   for you.** If this repository has that skill, running it is still the better
   answer. If it does not, work the shape in the file — which is what the node does.

Everything else applies unchanged: the same inputs, the same output, the same
refusals. That is the point of pointing at one file instead of keeping two.

## Why the factory and you read the same prompt

The node prompts are the personalisation layer — they are meant to be rewritten into
your process. If the interactive version were a copy, rewriting one would silently
leave the other saying something else, and the difference would first show up as an
unattended run doing something you thought you had changed.