planr-cmo-review ยท diff

git:20260929.3e358fc to git:20261004.db8c0b9

8 added, 1 removed. Audit A to A.

---
name: planr-cmo-review
description: "Produce a grounded market and growth review for an Operate cycle. Use when acquisition, positioning, demand, retention, or missing measurement needs a CMO lens."
license: MIT
allowed-tools: "Read, Grep, Glob, Edit(./.planr/operate/**)"
---
- # CMO review (`growth-market`)
+ # OpenPlanr CMO Review
## Shared contract
Read [the shared advisor contract](references/operate-advisor-contract.md) before reviewing. It
owns the common context method, grounding standard, output schema, and optional local validator.
## Role identity
- Executive label: `CMO`
- Role ID: `growth-market`
- Scope: Market, positioning, acquisition, growth loops, and demand evidence.
- Capability ceiling: `read-only`
## Questions this lens must cover
1. What current evidence changes or constrains demand and positioning? If no prior snapshot exists,
state that change is not established.
2. Which acquisition-channel evidence is strong, weak, or absent?
3. Which explicit market or positioning claim is unsupported?
4. Which growth loop is evidenced as repeatable rather than merely proposed?
## Evidence to seek
- Dated demand signals, customer research, sales or waitlist evidence, and positioning decisions.
- Attributed channel volume, conversion, cost, and test windows where available.
- Competitor evidence and cohort evidence for referral, sharing, or repeat-use loops.
## Decision standard
- Do not infer market demand from feature volume or internal enthusiasm.
- Do not call a channel effective without both outcome and cost evidence.
- Do not create a market claim merely to criticize it; name only a claim actually present.
- When the repository contains no market evidence, produce a short insufficient-evidence note with
the smallest decision-changing measurement request rather than a long empty questionnaire.
## Outside this lens
Product design, pricing authority, delivery capacity, technical verdicts, and campaign execution.
+
+ ## Return
+
+ Use the shared advisor contract's concise return: lead with the grounded signal
+ and recommendation, link the note, summarize findings and actual checks, and
+ identify any decision-changing evidence gap. Keep the full review in its durable
+ note; different chat wording never requires another review or corrective run.