nw-fp-principles · git:20260407.2d944b1 · 2026-04-07 · sha256 f590e3bfa75b5821
nw-fp-principles git:20260407.2d944b1A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/f590e3bfa75b5821.
--- name: nw-fp-principles agent: nw-functional-software-crafter description: Core functional programming thinking patterns and type system foundations, language-agnostic user-invocable: false disable-model-invocation: true --- # FP Principles Core functional programming thinking patterns. Language-agnostic. Cross-references: [fp-domain-modeling](../nw-fp-domain-modeling/SKILL.md) | [fp-hexagonal-architecture](../nw-fp-hexagonal-architecture/SKILL.md) | [fp-algebra-driven-design](../nw-fp-algebra-driven-design/SKILL.md) --- ## 1. Higher-Order Functions as Problem Decomposition [STARTER] Three operations replace most loops: | Operation | Purpose | Replaces | |-----------|---------|----------| | **Map** | Transform each element, preserve structure | Loop building new collection | | **Filter** | Keep elements matching condition | Loop with conditional | | **Fold** | Accumulate elements into single result | Loop with running total | **When to use Map**: Transform every element without changing collection shape. Nested maps handle nested structures. **When to use Filter**: Select elements without changing their values. **When to use Fold**: Reduce collection to single value. Accumulator IS your state. Combining function IS your state transition. Folds make state machines explicit. **Decision**: "Am I transforming, selecting, or accumulating?" Pick matching operation. If none fit, compose two. **Why**: These operations communicate intent. Map says "same shape, different values." Fold says "many inputs, one output." Loops say nothing about intent until you read every line. --- ## 2. Type-Driven Design [STARTER] Write the type signature before implementation. The type tells you what the function can and cannot do. **Process**: 1. Declare what the function consumes and produces 2. Ask: "which type-specific operations do I actually use?" 3. Replace concrete types with type variables for everything you don't inspect 4. Add constraints only for capabilities you use (equality, ordering, display) **Design progression**: Concrete types -> type variables -> constrained type variables. Each step increases reuse while documenting minimal assumptions. **Why**: Function's type signature is a contract. Narrower types mean fewer possible implementations, fewer bugs. --- ## 3. Pattern Matching as Decision Decomposition [STARTER] Decompose decisions by data shape, not boolean conditions. Each clause handles one concrete case. Compiler verifies exhaustiveness. **When to use pattern matching**: "What shape is this data?" **When to use guards/conditions**: "What property does this value have?" **When to use named bindings**: Intermediate results need a name to avoid repetition. **Heuristic**: Prefer small extracted functions over giant match expressions. Pattern match on top-level shape, delegate to named functions for sub-decisions. **Exhaustiveness as safety net**: When you add a new variant to a choice type, compiler flags every match that doesn't handle it. --- ## 4. Composition Patterns [INTERMEDIATE] ### Partial Application Fix some arguments of a general function to create specialized version. Eliminates throwaway helper functions. **When**: General function exists and you need specialized version for specific context. ### Function Composition (Pipelines) Chain functions where output of one feeds into next. Each function has single responsibility. **Why**: Composition reveals architecture of computation. Pipelines read as sequence of steps, making business process visible. ### Point-Free Style Omit explicit argument when function is just a composition. Use when it reveals intent. Avoid when it obscures meaning. --- ## 5. Container Abstractions [INTERMEDIATE] -> [ADVANCED] Progressive hierarchy for working with values inside containers (nullables, lists, futures, results). ### [INTERMEDIATE] Transformable Container (Functor) **What**: Apply function to values inside container without changing structure. **Plain English**: "I have a value in a box. Transform the value without opening the box." **When**: You have nullable/optional/list/future and want to transform contents without inspecting the container. **Guarantees**: Transforming with identity does nothing. Can fuse or split transformations freely. ### [INTERMEDIATE] Combinable Containers (Applicative) **What**: Apply a function inside a container to values inside other containers. **Plain English**: "I have a function in a box AND values in boxes. Combine them." **When**: Validation -- check multiple fields independently, combine results only if all succeed. Doesn't short-circuit; collects all errors. ### [INTERMEDIATE] Combinable Values (Monoid) **What**: Combine two values of same type into one, with default element that changes nothing. **Plain English**: "I have many values. Smash them together into one." **When**: Folding/reducing collections. Combining operation must be associative, enabling parallelism. **Examples**: String concatenation with empty string | addition with zero | list append with empty list. ### [ADVANCED] Chainable Operations (Monad) **What**: Chain operations where each step produces wrapped value, next step depends on previous result. **Plain English**: "Step 1's output determines what step 2 does. Each step might fail/branch/have effects." **When**: Sequential dependent operations where each step can fail, branch, or produce effects. ### Decision Tree: Which Abstraction Do I Need? ``` Do I need to transform values inside a container? YES, one function, one container --> Transformable (Functor) YES, combine multiple independent containers --> Combinable Containers (Applicative) YES, chain dependent operations sequentially --> Chainable Operations (Monad) Do I need to combine values of the same type? YES --> Combinable Values (Monoid) ``` ### Progression Summary Each level adds a new kind of combination: - **Transformable**: one function, one container - **Combinable Containers**: one function, multiple containers (independent) - **Chainable**: sequential dependent operations, each producing container - **Combinable Values**: same-type values collapsed into one ### Runnable Example: Map, Filter, Fold on Domain Objects ``` orders = [Order(100, "pending"), Order(250, "shipped"), Order(50, "pending")] pendingTotals = orders |> filter (o -> o.status == "pending") -- [Order(100, "pending"), Order(50, "pending")] |> map (o -> o.amount) -- [100, 50] |> fold 0 (acc, x -> acc + x) -- 150 ``` --- ## 6. Specialized Chainable Patterns [ADVANCED] | Pattern | What It Manages | When to Use | |---------|----------------|-------------| | **Optional** (Maybe/Option) | Possible absence | Operations that can fail without explanation | | **Result** (Either) | Failure with context | Operations that fail with error details | | **Environment** (Reader) | Shared read-only config | Dependency injection, configuration threading | | **Accumulator** (Writer) | Side-channel output | Logging, auditing, collecting metadata | | **Stateful** (State) | Sequential state changes | Counters, parsers, accumulators | These compose: real applications stack multiple patterns. See [fp-hexagonal-architecture](../nw-fp-hexagonal-architecture/SKILL.md) for DI patterns. --- ## 7. Lazy Evaluation as Design Pattern [INTERMEDIATE] Separate WHAT to compute from WHEN it gets computed. Define potentially infinite sequences and let consumer determine how much to evaluate. **When**: Generating candidates then selecting results | pagination and streaming | decoupling producers from consumers | build systems that only rebuild what changed. **Separation principle**: Generate all possibilities, then filter. Declarative style says WHAT you want, not HOW to search. --- ## 8. The FP Problem-Solving Method [STARTER] 1. **Start with type signature**: What does this function consume and produce? 2. **Identify traversal pattern**: Map, filter, fold, or search? 3. **Recognize accumulator**: If folding, what is the state and how does each element change it? 4. **Decompose by data shape**: Pattern match on constructors, handle each case independently 5. **Compose small functions**: Build complex behavior from simple, tested pieces **Mindset shift**: Describe WHAT to compute (transformations, compositions, constraints) rather than HOW (loops, mutations, control flow). | Imperative Thinking | Functional Thinking | |---------------------|---------------------| | Loop through items | Map/filter/fold over collections | | Mutate variables | Transform immutable values | | Check conditions with if/else | Pattern match on data shapes | | Inherit from base class | Satisfy capability constraints | | Call methods on objects | Compose functions into pipelines | | Handle errors with try/catch | Use Optional/Result for explicit failure in types | | Pass dependencies explicitly | Use Environment pattern for implicit config |