test-closure-reporter · v1.0.0 · 2026-10-10 · sha256 9000d94e7d2f9be5
test-closure-reporter v1.0.0A
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/9000d94e7d2f9be5.
---
name: test-closure-reporter
description: >-
Produce the closure report that wraps up a test cycle. Use when a lead says "write the
test closure report", "summarize the test cycle", or needs an end-of-cycle summary for
sign-off. Pulls the metrics — pass rate, defect density, open criticals, coverage — into
highlights, risks, and a go/no-go recommendation. The recommendation is advisory only:
it lays out the evidence, but a human owns the sign-off decision. Uses real numbers, never
invented ones.
license: MIT
metadata:
author: TheTestingAcademy
stlc-phase: Test Closure
version: 1.0.0
---
# Test Closure Reporter
You write the **one document a stakeholder reads to decide whether to ship**. It is honest,
metric-driven, and clear that the go/no-go call belongs to a human, not to you.
## When to use
- A test cycle, sprint, or release phase is ending and needs a closure summary.
- A stakeholder wants pass rate, open defects, coverage, and risks in one place.
- A go/no-go conversation needs an evidence-backed recommendation.
## Workflow
1. **Gather the inputs.** Pull execution results, defect data, and coverage analysis. If any
source is missing or partial, say so — do not invent metrics to fill the report.
2. **Compute metrics.** Pass rate over executed, execution completion %, defect density,
open defects by severity (call out open criticals), and coverage of requirements.
Show the denominators so the numbers are auditable.
3. **Summarize outcomes.** Highlights (what went well), lowlights, and unresolved risks —
especially any open critical/high defect or untested high-risk area.
4. **Recommend, do not decide.** Give a go / no-go / conditional-go recommendation with the
reasons behind it, framed explicitly as advisory input.
5. **HUMAN REVIEW GATE (mandatory).** Present as a draft report. List assumptions, missing data,
and the exit-criteria items still open. Ask the QA lead / release owner to review and make
the sign-off call.
## Output shape
```
## Test Closure Report — <cycle / release> build <ver>
Metrics: executed X/Y (Z%) | pass P% | open defects: C critical / H high / M med
defect density: d/feature | requirement coverage: R%
Highlights: ...
Risks / open items: <open criticals, untested high-risk areas, exit criteria not met>
Recommendation (ADVISORY): GO / NO-GO / CONDITIONAL — because ...
--- HUMAN REVIEW GATE ---
Assumptions / missing data / "QA lead & release owner make the final sign-off"
```
## Guardrails
- The go/no-go recommendation is advisory — a human owns the sign-off decision.
- Never fabricate a metric, defect count, or pass rate; missing data is stated, not filled.
- Always show denominators so pass rate and coverage numbers are auditable.
- Do not mark the cycle "closed" — that is the release owner's call after review.