ai-goal · git:20260910.d021330 · 2026-09-10 · sha256 490c7314d2421798
ai-goal git:20260910.d021330A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/490c7314d2421798.
--- name: ai-goal description: >- Use when the user wants to build in an autonomous loop — "loop this feature", "run these overnight", "write the goal for this" — pinning the loop contract: what it consumes, which gates it closes, when it stops, and what it reports, without ever reimplementing the loop itself (the surface's native goal mode runs it). Not for one-shot verification — use /ai-verify. Not for writing the plan the loop executes — use /ai-plan. license: MIT --- # ai-goal — the loop contract (Loop Engineering) The loop is NOT reimplemented: the surface's native goal mode runs it. This skill pins the loop contract from three source skills that cover the full method: feature setup with two human stops (mock and approval), the goal condition for one feature, and an overnight multi-feature queue. - Feature setup: folder, approved mock, re-entrant spec → [new-feature/SKILL.md](new-feature/SKILL.md) - The goal condition for one feature: pointer, reporting clause, met condition → [goal-writer/SKILL.md](goal-writer/SKILL.md) - Multi-feature queue with a builder subagent + adversary verifier → [feature-batch/SKILL.md](feature-batch/SKILL.md) ## Lifecycle Lane: standard, full Writes: .ai-engineering/plan.html Read by: the human, the next iteration of the loop Dies: with the milestone, when plan.html dies Next: ai-proof after each step; ai-verify when plan.html is fully green Source: Loop-Engineering, Loop Salon demo repo (attributed — no author or URL declared upstream; open license issue H4). ## The ai-engineering seam 1. The loop is NOT reimplemented: a surface with a native goal mode runs it (contract mode), and a surface without one runs under facilitator mode below — ai-goal fixes the contract either way. 2. It consumes `.ai-engineering/plan.html` and closes `.ai-engineering/spec.html` gates with receipts (`ai-eng spec run`). 3. The three stops of blueprint §5.1 become exit conditions: approved contract / loop guard deny / destructive action above budget. 4. The token/turn budget comes from `.ai-engineering/config.toml` (`[budget]`), not from the conversation. 5. The closing report is produced by ai-visual-recap (`.ai-engineering/recap.html`). 6. The "enough" criterion is KISS/YAGNI: the smallest thing that closes the gate. ## Facilitator mode The surface's declared capability decides which mode applies. A surface that declares a native goal loop runs **contract mode**: this skill pins the contract and the loop executes it. A surface that declares none is not handed off to a loop — this skill runs **facilitator mode** itself and walks `.ai-engineering/plan.html` one step at a time inside the session. Facilitator mode changes who advances the loop, not what the loop guarantees. The same three stops apply (approved contract / loop guard deny / destructive action above the `[budget]`), every closed gate gets the same receipt (`ai-eng spec run`), and the human is the clock: one step, its receipt, then stop and wait. No timer, no unattended queue, no implicit approval. An `unverified` surface runs facilitator mode until a receipt says otherwise. Native goal capability is a claim like any other, and the first honest receipt is what upgrades it; until that receipt exists, the slow path is the true one. ## Routing In scope: autonomous construction loops, overnight batches, goal contracts with gates and stop conditions. Not for: diagnosing a failure (/ai-debug), verifying a finished diff (/ai-verify), deciding what to build (/ai-brainstorm then /ai-plan).