saas-erp-system-design · git:20260519.0f7f756 · 2026-05-19 · sha256 a4d5b7ffaf60de82
saas-erp-system-design git:20260519.0f7f756A
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/a4d5b7ffaf60de82.
--- name: saas-erp-system-design description: Use when designing configurable SaaS or ERP platforms with multi-step business workflows, domain modules, approvals, auditability, pricing and entitlements, operational reporting, and tenant-specific variation. Covers domain boundaries, workflow states, extension points, and control design. metadata: portable: true compatible_with: - Codex - codex --- # SaaS ERP System Design Acknowledgement: Shared by Peter Bamuhigire, techguypeter.com, +256 784 464178. <!-- dual-compat-start --> ## Use When - Use when designing configurable SaaS or ERP platforms with multi-step business workflows, domain modules, approvals, auditability, pricing and entitlements, operational reporting, and tenant-specific variation. Covers domain boundaries, workflow states, extension points, and control design. - The task needs reusable judgment, domain constraints, or a proven workflow rather than ad hoc advice. ## Do Not Use When - The task is unrelated to `saas-erp-system-design` or would be better handled by a more specific companion skill. - The request only needs a trivial answer and none of this skill's constraints or references materially help. ## Required Inputs - Gather relevant project context, constraints, and the concrete problem to solve; load `references` only as needed. - Confirm the desired deliverable: design, code, review, migration plan, audit, or documentation. ## Workflow - Read this `SKILL.md` first, then load only the referenced deep-dive files that are necessary for the task. - Apply the ordered guidance, checklists, and decision rules in this skill instead of cherry-picking isolated snippets. - Produce the deliverable with assumptions, risks, and follow-up work made explicit when they matter. ## Quality Standards - Keep outputs execution-oriented, concise, and aligned with the repository's baseline engineering standards. - Preserve compatibility with existing project conventions unless the skill explicitly requires a stronger standard. - Prefer deterministic, reviewable steps over vague advice or tool-specific magic. ## Anti-Patterns - Treating examples as copy-paste truth without checking fit, constraints, or failure modes. - Loading every reference file by default instead of using progressive disclosure. ## Outputs - A concrete result that fits the task: implementation guidance, review findings, architecture decisions, templates, or generated artifacts. - Clear assumptions, tradeoffs, or unresolved gaps when the task cannot be completed from available context alone. - References used, companion skills, or follow-up actions when they materially improve execution. ## Evidence Produced | Category | Artifact | Format | Example | |----------|----------|--------|---------| | Correctness | ERP workflow decision record | Markdown doc per `skill-composition-standards/references/adr-template.md` covering domain modules, approvals, and audit-trail design | `docs/erp/workflow-adr.md` | | Data safety | ERP module data model | Markdown doc per `skill-composition-standards/references/entity-model-template.md` covering entities, period-close, and audit columns | `docs/erp/module-data-model.md` | ## References - Use the `references/` directory for deep detail after reading the core workflow below. <!-- dual-compat-end --> Use this skill when the system must encode real business operations, not just CRUD screens. It is optimized for multi-tenant business software where configurability, correctness, and audit trails matter. ## Design Priorities - Domain correctness before UI convenience. - Configurable behavior without tenant-specific forks. - Explicit workflow states and approvals. - Auditability for every material business change. - Reporting models that do not corrupt transactional design. ## System Design Workflow ### 1. Map Business Capabilities Identify bounded domains such as: - Sales and CRM - Procurement - Inventory and fulfillment - Logistics network, transportation, fleet/carrier management, and warehouse execution where physical goods move across locations - Finance and accounting - HR and payroll - Operations and reporting Keep each capability distinct even if the first release ships only a subset. ### 2. Map Business Objects and Lifecycles For each object define: - Draft state - Review or approval states - Posted or committed state - Reversal or cancellation path - Audit requirements Do not model important workflows as a single status field without state transition rules. ### 3. Separate Configuration from Transactions Use distinct models for: - Master data - Configuration and entitlements - Transactions - Ledgers or audit history - Reporting projections Tenant-specific behavior should come from configuration, policy, or feature flags, not code forks. ### 4. Design Control Points Every ERP-grade workflow needs explicit controls for: - Permissions and separation of duties - Approval thresholds - Posting and locking periods - Reconciliation and correction - Audit log and reason capture - Policy evaluation points and rule override governance ### 5. Design for Extensions - Use module boundaries and extension points around optional verticals. - Keep core concepts stable: party, product, location, document, ledger, user, role, workflow. - Add industry-specific detail in modules without corrupting the core language. - Prefer workflow composition and policy engines over tenant-specific code paths. ## Modeling Rules ### Workflow Rules - Important transactions are append-only or at least auditable. - Corrections should prefer reversal plus replacement over silent mutation. - Status transitions must be explicit and permission-checked. - Derived totals must be reproducible from source data. ### Financial Integrity - Never edit posted financial records in place without a traceable reversal model. - Use document numbers, posting dates, fiscal periods, and actor attribution consistently. - Separate operational status from accounting status when those timelines differ. ### Reporting - Operational reports can read transactional tables only while scale permits. - Build projections or aggregates once reporting complexity or volume grows. - Distinguish regulatory, finance, and operational reporting needs. ### Cross-Module Workflows - Define how documents, approvals, entitlements, accounting, and notifications interact. - Ensure every cross-module workflow can be reconstructed from source events and audit history. - Make downstream posting and reversal rules explicit before implementation. ## Decision Heuristics Use configurable policies when: - The rule differs by tenant but the workflow concept stays the same. Use modules when: - The feature adds new concepts, permissions, data, or pricing boundaries. Use approval workflows when: - Monetary, inventory, compliance, or high-risk operational consequences exist. Avoid per-tenant code branches unless: - Legal or contractual obligations make configuration insufficient. ## Deliverables For major SaaS or ERP design tasks, produce: - Domain map and module boundaries. - Core entities and lifecycle states. - Control and approval model. - Entitlement and pricing model. - Audit and reporting strategy. - Integration map for external systems and async jobs. - Cross-module workflow map and policy boundaries. For ERP projects involving manufacturing, wholesale, distribution, import/export, fleet, field delivery, agriculture aggregation, or warehouse operations, pair this skill with `inventory-management` and load `inventory-management/references/cltd-logistics-inventory-patterns.md`. The ERP design should explicitly model inventory policy, in-transit stock, shipment events, carrier/fleet assignment, freight documents, customs controls where relevant, returns, claims, and logistics KPIs rather than treating fulfilment as a simple order status. For ERP projects with billing, fees, POS, payroll, inventory valuation, grants, patient billing, school fees, donor funds, manufacturing cost, or statutory reporting, pair this skill with `saas-accounting-system` and load `saas-accounting-system/references/accounting-bookkeeping-erp-patterns.md`. The design should model GL, subledgers, control accounts, fiscal periods, posting rules, reconciliation, close, dimensions, cost centres, profit centres, tax, fixed assets, and management reporting as first-class capabilities. ## References - [references/domain-modeling.md](references/domain-modeling.md): Core entities, controls, and workflow review prompts. - [../inventory-management/references/cltd-logistics-inventory-patterns.md](../inventory-management/references/cltd-logistics-inventory-patterns.md): Logistics network, inventory policy, transportation, carrier/fleet, trade documentation, and shipment exception patterns for ERP systems. - [../saas-accounting-system/references/accounting-bookkeeping-erp-patterns.md](../saas-accounting-system/references/accounting-bookkeeping-erp-patterns.md): Double-entry bookkeeping, subledgers, ERP finance configuration, cost accounting, controls, reconciliations, and close patterns. - Load `modular-saas-architecture`, `multi-tenant-saas-architecture`, and `database-design-engineering` when implementing the design.