securing-code · git:20260419.8931d32 · 2026-04-19 · sha256 d2790b3ed1a54e09
securing-code git:20260419.8931d32A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/d2790b3ed1a54e09.
--- name: securing-code description: |- Use when writing or reviewing code that handles external input, manages access, touches data or crypto, or changes dependencies. Triggers: endpoints, auth/authz, DB/ORM, file handling, secrets, "is this secure?", "security review". NOT for formatting, pure UI, or explaining code. --- # Securing Code ## Invocation Notice Inform the user when this skill is being invoked: `securing-code`. ## When to Use - Implementing any feature, endpoint, service, or component - Writing auth, session management, or access control logic - Handling file uploads, secrets, crypto, or sensitive data - Reviewing code changes for security issues - Checking a diff, branch, or PR for security correctness ## When Not to Use - General code review without a security focus — `code-review` invokes this skill internally for its security lens - Explaining code without modifying it - Formatting or linting only - Writing documentation unrelated to security controls --- ## Tier 1 — Core Principles (Apply to Every Task) These apply regardless of task type — implementation or review. ### Secure Design Principles - **Assume breach** — design as if the system will be compromised; no single point of trust - **Validate all external input** — reject anything invalid; never try to "fix" bad input - **Validate first, then escape** — for the output context; use sanitization only when escaping is not possible, via a hardened library; prefer allowlists over blocklists - **Fail closed** — on error, roll back completely and deny access; never fail open - **Least privilege** — grant minimum permissions necessary at every layer - **Defense in depth** — layer controls; never rely on a single protection - **Zero trust** — verify on every request, not just once at login ### Code Generation Requirements All of the following must be satisfied when generating or modifying code: 01. **Parameterized queries** for all database access (SQL and NoSQL) — never concatenate user input 02. **Framework-native auth** — use framework or third-party auth/session/access-control; do not build custom authentication 03. **Per-request authorization** — enforce on every endpoint, AJAX call, page, and resource request including object-level checks 04. **Secret management** — load secrets from a secret manager; never hardcode keys, tokens, or passwords 05. **Approved cryptography** — AES-256-GCM for encryption, SHA-256/SHA-3 for hashing, Argon2id for passwords, Ed25519/ECDSA P-256 for signatures 06. **Context-aware output encoding** — encode all user-controlled data before rendering (HTML, JS, URL, CSS contexts) 07. **Safe error handling** — catch all exceptions, log details internally, show generic messages to users; fail closed with full rollback 08. **Rate limiting** — apply on all endpoints; no wildcard boundaries (`*`); no unlimited operations 09. **No unsafe deserialization** — never deserialize untrusted data; never pass user input to system calls 10. **Memory-safe languages preferred** — if C/C++, apply bounds checking and safe functions 11. **Security headers and cookies** — set security headers; use `Secure`, `HttpOnly`, `SameSite=Lax` (Strict for high-risk sessions); if `SameSite=None`, pair with `Secure` + CSRF defenses 12. **CSRF protection** — enable when the framework supports it for state-changing operations; add manually if not 13. **Deployment hygiene** — never run as root in production; initialize all variables; treat compiler warnings as errors ### Response Behavior - **State security assumptions** before writing code (auth model, data classification, framework) - **Flag skipped requirements** — anything simplified or omitted for brevity is a gap attackers find - **Append "Security Notes"** to all code responses: what the code does to meet each requirement, and what the developer still needs to configure (headers, secrets, IAM, logging) - **Never propose insecure shortcuts** "for simplicity" or "for now" - **Document exceptions explicitly** — if a business requirement forces a deviation, state it and propose the safest alternative --- ## Routing ### Implementation Tasks 1. Apply Tier 1 above (always) 2. Open `references/tier2-implementation.md` and follow the checklist for your task type: | Task | Section | | ----------------------------------- | ------- | | General feature / component | §2.1 | | REST or GraphQL API endpoint | §2.2 | | Auth, sessions, or access control | §2.3 | | Secrets, crypto, or data protection | §2.4 | | Supply chain or CI/CD | §2.5 | 3. For security-complex domains, also load the matching Tier 3 reference: | Domain | Reference | | ----------------------- | -------------------------------------- | | Input handling | `references/tier3-input-validation.md` | | File upload / download | `references/tier3-file-upload.md` | | Database-heavy features | `references/tier3-database.md` | | Auth / session flows | `references/tier3-threat-modeling.md` | | C / C++ / embedded | `references/tier3-memory-safety.md` | ### Review Tasks 1. Apply Tier 1 above (always) 2. Load `references/tier2-review.md` for the review workflow and checklist 3. Load relevant Tier 3 references for the domains covered by the change (same routing table as Implementation Tasks above) 4. Use `references/owasp-2025.md` to verify coverage against all 10 OWASP categories --- ## References - `references/tier2-implementation.md` — task-specific implementation checklists (§2.1–§2.5) - `references/tier2-review.md` — code review workflow, OWASP-mapped checklist, output format - `references/tier3-input-validation.md` — allowlist validation, output encoding, CSP - `references/tier3-file-upload.md` — file upload validation, storage, retrieval - `references/tier3-database.md` — injection prevention, DB access control, encryption - `references/tier3-error-handling.md` — safe error handling, security event logging - `references/tier3-memory-safety.md` — C/C++ memory safety, compiler flags, sanitizers - `references/tier3-language-specific.md` — Python, JS/Node, Java, C#/.NET forbidden patterns and safe alternatives - `references/tier3-threat-modeling.md` — STRIDE, trust boundaries, risk rating - `references/owasp-2025.md` — OWASP Top 10 2025 with control mapping to skill tiers