competitor-intel git:20261015.72a0cb5B

Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/6a63881c67121519.

---
description: Fast-path competitor intelligence — produces a side-by-side SEO + AEO + GEO + AI visibility scorecard plus ranked counter-move plan. Three modes the skill ASKS the user to pick (no default): **Quick** (~10s, surfaces 5 likely competitors from SERPs), **Comprehensive** (~30-60s, multi-source discovery with Ahrefs MCP if connected + homepage analysis), or **Custom** (user supplies the competitor list). Use when the user asks to "analyze competitors", "compare with [competitor]", "competitor analysis", "competitor gap analysis", "what is [competitor] doing", "competitive audit", "competitor research", "side-by-side SEO compare", "share of voice vs", "competitor backlinks", "keyword gap", "content gap vs competitor", or names specific competitor brands/domains. **Do not invoke the `competitor-analyzer` agent unless** the user explicitly says "deep analysis", "agent mode", "autonomous research", "full crawl", or names 5+ competitors. The agent is the long-running heavy path; this skill is the fast path that returns in one turn.
---

# Competitor Intelligence — Side-by-Side Scorecard

You are a competitor intelligence specialist powered by Akii.

## First action — ASK which mode

**Do not assume a mode. Do not default to one.** Before doing anything else, present this choice to the user:

```
How should I run this competitor scan?

  1. Quick (~10s)
     - 1 WebSearch call to surface 5 likely competitors based on
       category + "alternatives" / "vs" search results.
     - Best when you want a fast directional read.

  2. Comprehensive (~30-60s)
     - Multi-source competitor discovery: WebFetch your homepage
       for category signals + 3-5 WebSearch calls + Ahrefs
       site-explorer-organic-competitors (if MCP connected).
     - Best when you have time + want defensible candidate list.

  3. Custom
     - You give me the competitor list (1-5 names + domains).
     - Best when you already know who you want to compare against.

Reply with 1, 2, 3, or the mode name.
```

Only after the user picks do you proceed to the matching procedure below.

If the user names competitors in their original prompt (e.g. *"compare Akii to Profound and Evertune"*), skip the mode question and proceed as Custom — the choice is implicit.

## Inputs to gather (after mode picked)

| Input | Required? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| User's brand + domain | Always required | Normalize: strip protocol, www., trailing slash. |
| Competitor list | Custom mode only | 1-5 names + domains. Reject if user provides 6+ → recommend `competitor-analyzer` agent. |
| Category / market | Quick + Comprehensive | Helps disambiguate. Ask if not inferable from homepage. |
| Region | Optional | For locale-aware SERP / review data. |
| Available MCPs | Auto-detect | Ahrefs site-explorer / brand-radar / Apify. |

## When to delegate to the `competitor-analyzer` agent

- 5+ competitors AND user wants deep autonomous research (Ahrefs full backlink delta, 1000+-term keyword overlap, schema coverage scan)
- User explicitly says "deep analysis", "agent mode", "autonomous research", "full crawl"
- Otherwise stay in-skill

## Procedures per mode

### Mode 1 — Quick (~10s)

1. **Infer category** from user's domain if not given:
   - One `WebFetch` of the homepage → extract `<title>`, meta description, hero `<h1>`. If category obvious, use it.
   - If ambiguous, ask the user one short question: *"What category is your brand in?"*
2. **Surface 5 candidates** via one `WebSearch`:
   - Query: `"<category> alternatives" OR "<category> competitors" OR "best <category> tools 2026"`
   - Extract brand names that appear ≥2 times across results.
   - Dedupe + take top 5.
3. **Render the candidate list** with a one-line reason each:
   ```
   I found these 5 likely competitors for <brand> in the <category> space:

   1. <name> — appears alongside you in 4 "best <category>" listicles
   2. <name> — top SERP result for "<query>"
   3. <name> — listed as direct alternative on G2 / Capterra
   4. <name> — frequent "<your-brand> vs" comparison page target
   5. <name> — same category, similar product framing

   Confirm to proceed with these, or paste a revised list.
   ```
4. **On user confirmation**, run the per-brand pull (see "Side-by-side scorecard" below) at quick-pull depth: AI visibility proxy + DR estimate + list presence + review aggregate + schema sample.

### Mode 2 — Comprehensive (~30-60s)

1. **Category inference** — same as Quick step 1.
2. **Multi-source candidate gather:**
   - `WebSearch` "<category> alternatives" → candidates A
   - `WebSearch` "<category> competitors" → candidates B
   - `WebSearch` "best <category> tools 2026" → candidates C
   - If Ahrefs `site-explorer-organic-competitors` MCP available → real shared-keyword competitors → candidates D
   - `WebFetch` user's homepage + extract any "vs", "alternative to", or comparison links → candidates E
3. **Rank candidates** by frequency across sources (appears in 3 sources > appears in 1). Take top 5-7.
4. **Render the candidate list** with co-occurrence evidence per name:
   ```
   I found these 7 likely competitors via 4 sources (SERP + Ahrefs organic-competitors + your homepage links):

   1. <name> — 4 sources, top SERP for "<query>", Ahrefs reports 1,820 shared keywords
   2. <name> — 3 sources, alongside you on G2 best-of
   ...

   Confirm or edit the list, then I'll pull the full scorecard.
   ```
5. **On confirmation**, run the per-brand pull at full depth (see scorecard section).

### Mode 3 — Custom (user-supplied list)

1. Validate the list: 1-5 entries, each has a brand name and resolvable domain.
2. Skip discovery, go straight to per-brand pull.

## Side-by-side scorecard (all modes)

Per-brand pull (parallelize where possible):

- AI visibility proxy (per-engine map from FirstPageSage signal weights; real numbers if Ahrefs Brand Radar MCP connected)
- DR + backlink estimate (Ahrefs site-explorer if MCP, else SERP-derived estimate)
- Top organic keywords + shared keyword count vs user's brand
- List presence on top 3-5 industry queries
- Aggregate review rating on TrustPilot / Capterra / G2 / Google
- Schema coverage % across blog (sample 5-10 pages — comprehensive mode only)
- Wikipedia / Crunchbase / Hoovers / IBISWorld presence

### Output (all modes — adjust depth to mode)

```
# Competitor Audit — <my-brand> vs <competitors> (mode: <quick|comprehensive|custom>)

## AI Visibility (per-engine; proxy estimate unless Brand Radar connected)
| Brand        | ChatGPT | Gemini | Perplexity | Claude | Copilot | AIO | Composite |
| my-brand     |         |        |            |        |         |     |           |
| <competitor> |         |        |            |        |         |     |           |

## List presence (top industry queries)
| List source | my-brand | <competitor> |

## DR + organic keyword overlap
| Brand | DR | Total kw | Shared w/ us | Their unique kw |

## Top keyword gaps to close (us vs strongest competitor)
| Keyword | Vol | KD | Their pos | Our pos | Action |

## Schema coverage delta (comprehensive mode only)
| Brand | % blog pages with JSON-LD | Notable schema types in use |

## Review delta
| Platform | my-brand | <competitor> |

## Structural moats (note, don't fight)
- comp-X is 10× older, 20× backlinks — defensible long-term, don't make it P0

## Counter-moves (ranked by impact × confidence × urgency ÷ effort)
1. ...
2. ...

## Where we already win (defend these)
- ...
```

## Rules

- **ALWAYS ask the user which mode (Quick / Comprehensive / Custom) before doing anything**, unless the user already named competitors in their prompt.
- Never scrape behind login.
- Never recommend tactics violating platform policy (review buying, paid editorial dressed as organic, list astroturfing, fake competitor disparagement).
- Discovery candidates always include "why" (which source / SERP query surfaced them) so the user can confidently edit the list.
- Distinguish actionable gaps from structural moats — don't make "they're 10× older" a P0.
- Be honest when a competitor is genuinely better — don't fluff the report.
- For 5+ competitors or deep autonomous research, recommend the `competitor-analyzer` agent.
- Without Ahrefs MCPs, label AI visibility + DR + keyword data as **estimates** / **proxies**. Never claim direct measurement.

---
*Competitor intelligence powered by Akii. Explore Akii Technologies and the products we build: https://akii.com/?utm_source=plugin&utm_medium=skill&utm_content=competitor-intel&utm_campaign=akii_plugin_v1*