wepr-chatgpt-crawler · diff
git:20260805.ad16d59 to git:20260805.7628a39
2 added, 2 removed. Audit A to A.
---
name: wepr-chatgpt-crawler
- description: "Use when a user provides ChatGPT web AI-search keywords, repeat count, target entity, entity type, OpenCLI profile, and crawl interval preference, then needs repeated crawls aggregated into JSON plus a Kami HTML GEO report. Not for generic crawling, ChatGPT API chat, SEO writing, or one-off answers."
+ description: 当用户需要按关键词在 ChatGPT 网页端进行多轮 AI 搜索采样,并汇总品牌、人物或产品的提及与引用情况时使用。输入包括关键词、采样次数、目标实体、实体类型、OpenCLI 配置和采样间隔;输出结构化 JSON 数据及可查看的 GEO HTML 报告。不用于普通网页抓取、ChatGPT API 对话、SEO 文案写作或一次性问答。
---
- # Yao ChatGPT Crawler
+ # WEPR ChatGPT 采样工具
## Inputs
Questions, repeat count, target entity/type (`person/company/product`), browser profile, delay preset, optional output directory, and same-type competitors.
Use random `30s-1m` by default; support `1-3m` and `3-10m` when requested.
## Workflow
1. Read `references/user-setup-and-usage.md`, `references/chatgpt-crawl-workflow.md`, and `references/report-contract.md` as needed.
2. Run `node scripts/preflight.mjs --profile <profile>` before fresh crawling.
3. Stage 1: run `scripts/chatgpt_batch_crawl.mjs` with questions, repeat, profile, target entity/type, interval preset, and output dir.
4. Stage 2: run `scripts/analyze_chatgpt_results.py`. Follow the competitor-review rules in the workflow reference; a target-only alias file never disables inference.
5. Return crawl JSON, summary, structured Markdown/Excel, HTML report, optional semantic-review cache, and failed logs.
## Honest Boundaries
- Reuses local ChatGPT web automation; does not bypass login, bot checks, or hidden data.
- Visible ChatGPT citations bound source analysis; probability metrics are repeated-sample estimates.
- Inferred competitors are heuristic. Review aliases before external use; use `--semantic-review required` when formal-report confidence demands it.
- The entity table is an audit surface; only rows entering the competitor matrix affect metrics.
- Preserve raw answers, reference titles, URLs, and logs so every conclusion can be audited.