new-issue-loop · git:20260927.55c2280 · 2026-09-27 · sha256 e49331404192d24e
new-issue-loop git:20260927.55c2280A
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/e49331404192d24e.
--- name: new-issue-loop description: Use when the user asks to file a GitHub issue and then autonomously drive it all the way to a reviewed PR in one shot — "new-issue-loop", "create the issue and run it to completion", "file this and fully automate it". Runs new-issue to create a fully-specified issue, then hands the new issue number to validate-issue-loop (validate → update → work-on-issue-loop) — stopping instead when new-issue finds a duplicate or the discussion hasn't converged on one issue. --- # new-issue-loop Chain new-issue → validate-issue-loop into one autonomous run, so a bug/idea/discussion goes from "described" to "filed issue with a PR through N rounds of review" without a human in the loop between steps. This is new-issue's normal interactive handoff (`Offer "validate issue" / "work on issue"`) made unattended: the loop takes the issue it just filed and feeds it straight into the validate-and-implement pipeline. **Do not skip filing a complete issue.** The downstream loop validates and implements *the issue text* — a thin or unverified body propagates straight into the PR. Every step of new-issue still runs (grounding, approach design, complexity score); only the "offer next steps and wait" step is replaced by the handoff. ## Input Same as new-issue: an optional description of what the issue should cover; with no input, derive it from the current conversation. Optionally `owner/repo` when the issue belongs elsewhere. ## Steps ### 1. Run new-issue Invoke the `new-issue` skill (Skill tool, `skill: new-issue`) with the user's description (or conversation-derived scope). Let it run its full process — duplicate check, code grounding, approach, complexity score, filing. Capture the created issue number from its report. ### 2. Stop gate — cases the loop can't safely continue | Condition | Action | |---|---| | new-issue found an existing open issue/PR already covering it (no issue filed) | **STOP.** Report the duplicate and new-issue's offer to update/comment instead — whether to merge scopes is a human call. | | The conversation held several distinct candidates | If one clearly converged, file it and **continue the chain with it**; the unfiled candidates go in the final report. If none clearly converged, **STOP** — report the candidates and ask which to file. Never bundle, never auto-file the extras. | | new-issue split the work and named unfiled follow-ups | Continue with the **core issue only**; relay the unfiled follow-ups in the final report. | Otherwise (one issue filed cleanly), continue. ### 3. Hand off to validate-issue-loop Invoke the `validate-issue-loop` skill (Skill tool, `skill: validate-issue-loop`) with the issue from step 1 passed explicitly, so it never resolves a different issue from session context. If new-issue filed to a repo other than the current checkout (`-R owner/repo`), pass the full `owner/repo#N` reference, not the bare number — a bare number resolves against the current repo and would target the wrong issue. Its own scope gate (too large / infeasible / already-addressed) still applies and may stop the run; that's the designed behavior, not a failure. Validating an issue this same session just wrote is not redundant: validate-issue re-traces the claims against the code independently, catching anything the filing pass got wrong. ### 4. Report Relay validate-issue-loop's final summary (PR URL, review cycles, verdict), prefixed with one line covering the front of the chain: issue number/URL filed, complexity score, and any unfiled follow-ups from step 2. **Cap the whole report at 55 words, plain simple English in ASD-STE100** — apply the Response Style rules in CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md, written for a reader with no context on this codebase. ## Red Flags — STOP | Situation | Action | |---|---| | Tempted to skip new-issue's grounding/duplicate check to get to implementation faster | Never — a fabricated or duplicate issue poisons the whole chain | | new-issue stopped on a duplicate | Stop and report per step 2 — don't file anyway | | Tempted to hand off without an explicit issue reference | Always pass the issue from step 1 — `owner/repo#N` if filed cross-repo, so session context cannot pick a different issue | | validate-issue-loop's scope gate stops the run | Report its disposition faithfully — don't override and implement anyway |