conventional-commits · v1.0.0 · 2026-04-08 · sha256 f1a6d0df1ac88178
conventional-commits v1.0.0A
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/f1a6d0df1ac88178.
---
name: conventional-commits
description: Generates and formats git commit messages following the Conventional Commits specification. Use when the user asks for help writing commit messages, formatting git commits, wants to write a commit msg for staged changes, needs to produce a changelog entry, or mentions conventional commits, semantic versioning, or version bumps. Analyzes diffs or change descriptions, selects the correct type/scope, writes an imperative-mood header under 72 characters, and composes optional body and footer sections including breaking-change notation.
metadata:
title: Writing Conventional Commit Messages
type: skill
category: Development
version: 1.0.0
tags:
- git
- commits
- version-control
- semantic-versioning
- best-practices
last_updated: 2026-01-26
---
## Mindset
Conventional Commits exist to make commit history machine-readable. The type prefix is a contract: `feat` triggers a MINOR version bump, `fix` triggers PATCH, and `!` or `BREAKING CHANGE:` triggers MAJOR. Every commit is a semantic event, not just a description of code changes.
Write the header for the person reviewing a CHANGELOG six months from now, not for yourself today. The body explains *why* — the code already shows *what*.
A less obvious implication: **scope consistency drives changelog quality more than type correctness.** A perfectly typed `feat` with an ad-hoc scope like `feat(getUserById):` produces a one-line changelog group with no neighbours. Establish a fixed scope vocabulary early — see [Scope Naming and Commit Strategy](references/scope-and-strategy.md).
## When to Use
Apply when the user asks for help writing commit messages, wants to format staged changes as a commit, needs a CHANGELOG entry, or mentions conventional commits, semantic versioning, or version bumps.
When not to use: skip this skill if the project explicitly avoids Conventional Commits (e.g. uses Angular-style without the spec, or enforces a custom pattern via a project-specific hook). Do not override confirmed project conventions.
## Procedure
1. **Inspect the change** — read the diff or the user's description. Identify whether it adds new behaviour, fixes existing behaviour, or neither.
2. **Choose the type** — use the Type Reference table. Decision rules for common ambiguities:
- `refactor` vs `feat`: does the user gain new capability? If yes → `feat`
- `fix` vs `refactor`: does the change correct wrong behaviour? If yes → `fix`
- `perf` vs `refactor`: is there a measurable latency/throughput improvement? If yes → `perf`
- `chore` vs anything else: if another type fits, use it — `chore` is the last resort
- Multiple types needed? Split into multiple commits (see [Atomic Commits](references/scope-and-strategy.md))
3. **Pick the scope** — use the module, package, or layer name (e.g. `auth`, `checkout`, `api`). Omit scope when the change is truly cross-cutting. Use a fixed vocabulary if the project defines one. See [scope naming](references/scope-and-strategy.md) for conventions.
4. **Draft the header** — imperative mood, lowercase, ≤ 72 characters. Verify with: "If applied, this commit will `<header>`."
5. **Add a body if needed** — only when the *why* is not obvious. Explain the reasoning, not the implementation. Wrap at 72 characters.
6. **Add footers** — `Closes: #N` for issue references; `BREAKING CHANGE: <description>` whenever the public API surface changes. Always pair `!` with a `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer.
7. **Verify before committing** — run `git commit --dry-run` or your local commitlint hook to catch formatting violations before they enter history.
**Agent output format:** Present the commit message in a fenced code block with no extra commentary, ready to paste:
```
feat(auth): add OAuth2 login support
Allows users to sign in with Google and GitHub. Replaces the
username/password flow for external accounts.
Closes: #412
```
## Commit Message Format
```
<type>[optional scope]: <description>
[optional body]
[optional footer(s)]
```
**Rules:**
- Description: imperative mood (`add` not `added`), lowercase, no trailing period, ≤ 72 characters
- Body: separated by one blank line, lines wrapped at 72 characters, explains *why* not *what*
- Footers: `Token: value` format (e.g. `Closes: #123`, `BREAKING CHANGE: description`)
## Type Reference
| Type | SemVer Impact | Use When |
| ----------- | --------------------- | --------------------------------- |
| `feat` | MINOR (1.0.0 → 1.1.0) | New feature or user-facing capability |
| `fix` | PATCH (1.0.0 → 1.0.1) | Bug fix or incorrect behavior |
| `build` | None | Build system or dependency changes |
| `ci` | None | CI/CD configuration changes |
| `docs` | None | Documentation only |
| `style` | None | Code formatting, no logic change |
| `refactor` | None | Restructuring, same behavior |
| `perf` | None | Measurable performance improvement |
| `test` | None | Adding or updating tests |
| `chore` | None | Maintenance not covered above |
| `revert` | Varies | Reverting a previous commit |
**Breaking changes:** append `!` after type/scope (`feat!:`) and/or add a `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer — triggers a MAJOR version bump.
## Examples
**Simple feature:**
```
feat(auth): add OAuth2 login support
```
**Bug fix with context:**
```
fix(checkout): prevent duplicate order submissions
Race condition when users double-clicked submit during network
latency. Implemented debouncing with a 2-second window.
Fixes: #234
```
**Breaking change with migration info:**
```
refactor!: consolidate API endpoints under /api/v2
BREAKING CHANGE: All endpoints moved from /endpoints/* to /api/v2/*
Migration:
- /endpoints/users → /api/v2/users
- /endpoints/auth → /api/v2/auth
See docs/migration-v2.md for the full migration guide.
```
**Performance improvement:**
```
perf(search): cache query results with Redis
Cache TTL set to 5 minutes. Reduces average query time from 500ms to 50ms.
Benchmark (1000 req/s sustained):
- Before: 500ms avg, 2s p99
- After: 50ms avg, 200ms p99
```
## Anti-Patterns
### NEVER use past tense in the description
- **WHY**: The header completes the sentence "If applied, this commit will…" — past tense breaks that contract and reads as a changelog entry, not a commit instruction.
- **BAD**: `fix(auth): fixed token expiration bug` — **GOOD**: `fix(auth): prevent token expiration on refresh`
### NEVER use `chore` as a catch-all
- **WHY**: `chore` is for maintenance tasks not covered by other types (e.g., bumping lock files). Using it for features, refactors, or docs hides semantic meaning from changelog generators.
- **BAD**: `chore: update auth module`, `chore: fix login bug` — **GOOD**: `refactor(auth): extract token refresh logic`, `fix(auth): resolve null pointer on logout`
### NEVER exceed 72 characters in the header
- **WHY**: Git log, GitHub PR titles, and most CI tools truncate at 72 characters. Longer headers break tooling and lose critical context.
- **BAD**: `feat(checkout): add new payment processing integration with Stripe for recurring subscriptions` — **GOOD**: `feat(checkout): add Stripe recurring subscription support`
### NEVER omit `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer when the API surface changes
- **WHY**: The `!` suffix alone is not sufficient for all tooling. `BREAKING CHANGE:` in the footer carries the migration description that changelog generators parse for release notes.
- **BAD**: `feat!: remove /v1 endpoints` (no footer) — **GOOD**: `feat!: remove /v1 endpoints` + footer `BREAKING CHANGE: /v1/* routes deleted; migrate to /api/v2/*`
### NEVER put implementation details in the header
- **WHY**: The header is the commit summary visible in `git log --oneline`. Implementation details belong in the body.
- **BAD**: `fix(db): change SQL query from SELECT * to SELECT id,name in getUserById` — **GOOD**: `fix(db): reduce getUserById query to required columns` (details in body)
### NEVER bundle unrelated changes in one commit
- **WHY**: A commit that spans multiple concerns can't be cherry-picked or reverted cleanly. It also produces ambiguous changelog entries and forces reviewers to untangle intent from implementation.
- **BAD**: `fix(auth): prevent token expiration and update README and bump deps` — **GOOD**: Three commits: `fix(auth): prevent token expiration`, `docs(auth): document token refresh flow`, `chore(deps): bump jsonwebtoken to 9.0.2`
## Quick Validation
Validate a message ad-hoc:
```bash
echo "feat(auth): add OAuth2 login" | npx commitlint
```
Scan recent history:
```bash
git log --oneline -10
git log --format="%s" HEAD~5..
```
For full commitlint setup, CHANGELOG generation, and semantic-release, see [Team Tooling](references/tooling.md).
## References
- [Scope Naming and Commit Strategy](references/scope-and-strategy.md) — scope vocabulary, atomic commit patterns, revert format
- [Team Tooling](references/tooling.md) — commitlint setup, CHANGELOG generation, semantic-release, history verification
- [Conventional Commits Specification](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/) — canonical spec defining types, scopes, breaking changes, and CHANGELOG generation
- [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/) — versioning contract that Conventional Commits maps to (MAJOR/MINOR/PATCH)
- [commitlint Documentation](https://commitlint.js.org/) — automated commit message validation for CI and pre-commit hooks