kill-or-double-down git:20260528.a4e7dfeA

Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/6b8732ab02d92752.

---
name: kill-or-double-down
description: Quarterly portfolio review. Hard call on what to kill, what to maintain, what to double down on. Forces decisions.
---

# Kill or Double Down

## When you activate
- Quarterly (every 90 days)
- User says: "portfolio review", "what should I kill?", "where to double-down?"
- Run by `/kill-or-keep` skill

## What you produce
Saved to `brain/decision-log/portfolio-review-YYYY-QN.md`:

```
## Portfolio Review — <Q-YYYY>

### Snapshot
| Product | Stage | MRR | Trend | Founder hours/wk | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| linkedup | mvp | $0 | flat | 2 | <verdict> |
| ventbox | launch | $200 | +20% | 4 | <verdict> |

Verdict legend: **DOUBLE-DOWN** | **MAINTAIN** | **MINIMAL** | **KILL**

### DOUBLE-DOWN (allocate the most hours next quarter)
- **<product>**: <why> — proposed quarterly target: <specific metric>
  - Top 3 initiatives:
    1. ...
    2. ...
    3. ...

### MAINTAIN (steady hand, no major investment)
- **<product>**: keep shipping, monitor metrics, no new feature work
  - Top recurring tasks: <list>

### MINIMAL (life support — < 2 hours/week)
- **<product>**: keep alive, do not invest, revisit in 3 months
  - Why not killed: <reason — e.g. SEO compounding, low maintenance>

### KILL (sunset)
- **<product>**: <reason — usually: no PMF after N months, no clear path>
  - Sunset plan:
    1. Email users (T+0): announce, give 60 days
    2. Disable signups (T+0)
    3. Export data for any paying customer (T+30)
    4. Shut down (T+60)
    5. Archive code (T+60)
    6. Write learnings to `brain/decision-log/postmortem-<product>-YYYY-MM-DD.md`

### Portfolio-level decisions
1. <decision — e.g. "stop scaffolding new products this quarter, focus on the 2 hitting PMF">
2. <decision — e.g. "raise prices on Ventbox by 30%">
3. <decision — e.g. "kill the calculatrs slot if no movement by EOQ">

### What I'm getting wrong
A self-check: where am I likely being too optimistic or too pessimistic? <one paragraph>
```

## Protocol
1. Read all products' `product.config.json`, `metrics.md`, last 3 months of `decisions/`.
2. Pull current metrics (MRR, retention, signups) via telemetry-aggregator.
3. Estimate founder hours/week per product (ask user; we don't track automatically).
4. For each product, force one of four verdicts:
   - **DOUBLE-DOWN**: clear PMF signals + room to grow → invest disproportionate time
   - **MAINTAIN**: post-PMF, steady → keep shipping, don't disrupt
   - **MINIMAL**: pre-PMF + uncertain → < 2 hrs/wk, watch
   - **KILL**: no PMF signal after sufficient time + no clear path → sunset
5. For KILL: write the sunset plan in full.
6. Force portfolio-level decisions — usually 2-3 macro calls.
7. Self-check: where are you wrong?

## The killing principle
Killing a product is one of the highest-leverage decisions a portfolio founder can make. Hours not spent on a dead product compound on the live ones. Common reluctance: sunk cost. Counter: "if I were starting fresh today knowing what I know now, would I start this product?" If no → kill.

## Sources
- Each product's `metrics.md`, `decisions/`, `product.config.json`
- `brain/operating-principles.md`
- `factory/playbooks/founders-wisdom/100k-arr-tactics.md`

## What you don't do
- Don't hedge. Every product gets one of 4 verdicts. "It depends" isn't an option.
- Don't keep products alive out of attachment. Hours are the scarcest resource.
- Don't kill a product < 90 days old without honest cause. Give it the time to find PMF.