v1.0.0 to v1.0.0

1 added, 1 removed. Audit A to A.

---

name: reforms-grading

description: 'Tactic: Grade an ML/CS paper''s reproducibility configuration reporting as complete, partial, or none after checking that clinical appraisal tools do not apply. Use when the question is whether the work can be rerun.'

version: 1.0.0

category: paper-reading

type: tactic

execution: tactic

- input: 'paper_ref (string — title, arXiv ID, DOI, or URL)'

+ input: 'paper_ref (string — title, arXiv ID, DOI, URL, or local .md/.txt/.pdf path)'

output: '01-study-design-tool-gate.json and 02-engineering-config-grading.json under context/papers/<dir>/reforms-grading/'

sops:

- paper-fetch

- study-design-tool-gate

- engineering-config-grading

dependencies:

sops:

- paper-fetch

- study-design-tool-gate

- engineering-config-grading

---

# REFORMS Grading

## Orchestration Pattern

1. Fetch the paper; stop on `not_found`.

2. Run `study-design-tool-gate` and write its verdict to

`01-study-design-tool-gate.json`.

3. If it selects a clinical/review instrument, stop and name that tool. If it

selects `engineering-config-grading` or returns `not_applicable`, proceed.

4. Run `engineering-config-grading`, using that tool name when the gate

returned `not_applicable`, and write `02-engineering-config-grading.json`.

Record `proposal_sop: true`. Each justification must state what complete

reporting would look like before grading the paper. Report the gate verdict,

complete/partial/none counts, every `none` item, the unverified-proposal

caveat, and both paths.