AGENTS.md · diff
git:20260930.a8a7956 to git:20260930.9c34088
26 added, 15 removed. Audit B to B.
# AGENTS.md
This file provides guidance to Claude Code (claude.ai/code) when working with code in this repository.
## What This Is
**The Agentic Startup** is a spec-driven development framework for Claude Code, distributed as marketplace plugins. It provides workflow commands, autonomous skills, specialized agents, and output styles to transform how you build software.
## Repository Structure
```
the-startup/
├── plugins/
│ ├── start/ # Core workflow orchestration plugin
│ │ ├── .claude-plugin/ # Plugin manifest (plugin.json)
│ │ ├── skills/ # workflow skills (user-invocable) + internal spec/implement skills
│ │ ├── output-styles/ # The Startup, The ScaleUp output styles
│ │ └── README.md # Detailed plugin documentation
│ │
│ ├── team/ # Specialized agent library plugin
│ │ ├── agents/ # 8 roles with 15 consolidated activity agents
│ │ │ ├── the-chief.md # Complexity assessment, routing
│ │ │ ├── the-analyst/ # research-product
│ │ │ ├── the-architect/ # design-system, review-security, review-robustness, review-compatibility
│ │ │ ├── the-developer/ # build-feature, optimize-performance, etc.
│ │ │ ├── the-devops/ # build-platform, monitor-production
│ │ │ ├── the-designer/ # research-user, design-interaction, design-visual
│ │ │ ├── the-tester/ # test-strategy
│ │ │ └── the-meta-agent.md # Agent design and generation
│ │ └── skills/ # 16 consolidated cross-cutting and domain skills
│ │
│ └── constitution/ # Project governance rules plugin (optional)
│
├── scripts/
│ ├── statusline.sh # Custom statusline for Claude Code terminal
│ └── statusline.toml # Statusline configuration template
│
├── docs/
│ ├── PHILOSOPHY.md # Activity-based architecture rationale
│ ├── PRINCIPLES.md # Core development principles
│ ├── patterns/ # Technical patterns documentation
│ └── specs/ # Feature specifications (requirements, solution, plan + scenarios)
│
├── package.json # npm package definition for npx installer
└── README.md # User-facing documentation
```
## Key Concepts
### Plugin Architecture
Each plugin lives in `plugins/[name]/` with:
- `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` - Plugin manifest defining name, version, components
- `commands/` - Slash command definitions (markdown files)
- `skills/` - Autonomous skills (SKILL.md files with trigger terms)
- `output-styles/` - Output style definitions
- `agents/` - Agent definitions (team plugin only)
### Skill Structure
Skills use progressive disclosure to minimize context usage:
```
skills/[skill-name]/
├── SKILL.md # Core logic (~7-24 KB, always loaded)
├── reference/ # Advanced protocols (loaded when needed)
├── templates/ # Document templates
├── examples/ # Real-world scenarios
└── validation.md # Quality checklists
```
For full skill conventions, PICS structure, and transformation checklist, see the `writing-skills` skill (`plugins/start/skills/writing-skills/reference/conventions.md`).
### Agent Structure (Team Plugin)
Agents are organized by role with activity-based specializations:
```
agents/the-[role]/
├── [activity-1].md # e.g., the-architect/design-system.md
├── [activity-2].md # e.g., the-architect/review-security.md
└── ...
```
Each agent markdown file defines:
- Purpose and trigger conditions
- Tool access permissions
- Activation examples
- Integration with other agents
## Development Workflow
### Testing Changes Locally
```bash
# The plugins are directories - test by installing from local path
claude plugin install ./plugins/start
claude plugin install ./plugins/team
# Or use the interactive installer to test full installation
npx the-startup
# Uninstall to reset
claude plugin uninstall start@the-startup
claude plugin uninstall team@the-startup
```
### Editing Skills
1. Skills are markdown files (`SKILL.md`) - edit directly
2. Skills activate on trigger terms defined in their YAML frontmatter
3. Keep `SKILL.md` under ~25 KB for context efficiency
4. Move advanced content to `reference/` directory (loaded on demand)
### Editing Commands
1. Commands are markdown files in `plugins/[plugin]/commands/`
2. Command name matches filename (e.g., `specify.md` → `/start:specify`)
3. Commands orchestrate skills - they define workflow, skills provide implementation
### Editing Agents
1. Agents are markdown files in `plugins/team/agents/[role]/`
2. Agent name matches `[role]:[activity]` pattern
3. Agents define specialized Task tool prompts for subagent delegation
### Editing Output Styles
1. Output styles are markdown files in `plugins/[plugin]/output-styles/`
2. Define personality, voice, and behavioral patterns
3. Activated via `/output-style [plugin]:[style-name]`
## Important Patterns
### Progressive Disclosure
Skills load minimal context initially, then progressively load:
- `reference/` - Advanced protocols when complexity increases
- `templates/` - Document templates when creating artifacts
- `examples/` - Real-world scenarios when pattern matching
### Spec-Driven Development
The primary workflow: `/start:specify` → `/start:validate` → `/start:implement` → `/start:review`
The specification describes **WHY** and **WHAT** (the target state and what "done" looks like); the implementation is a set of **tasks** in the spec's tracker. **HOW** to build each task is decided by the code agent inside the implementation loop. The two concerns are split across a clean line.
Specifications live in `.start/specs/[NNN]-[name]/` (legacy: `docs/specs/`):
- `requirements.mdx` — **WHY**: problem, users, acceptance criteria
- `solution.mdx` — **WHAT (design)**: target architecture, components, interfaces
- `plan.mdx` — **WHAT (narrative)**: the high-level approach — phases and achievable outcomes, plus a link to the tracker. Read for orientation, not parsed for work.
- `.tracker/` — the operational **tasks** (managed by `task.js`): a root **phase** task, one **slice** task per vertical deliverable (its body is the code brief — features + EARS behavior + quality gates), and under each slice its **scenario** child tasks (the holdout acceptance evidence). `--depends-on` edges between slices are the parallelization contract.
The specification carries **no task-by-task instructions** — a slice says what it delivers and how it is proven, never the steps to build it. `/start:specify` runs Requirements → Solution → Plan (a 5-step flow: init → requirements → solution → plan → finalize); `specify-plan` writes the narrative `plan.mdx` and creates the tracker tasks.
#### One implementation loop (the dynamic-workflow runtime)
- There is a single `/start:implement`, and it always runs on Claude Code's **dynamic-workflow runtime**. It reads the spec's tasks from the tracker and launches the reusable workflow script that ships beside it — `implement/reference/implement.js`, whose `meta.name` is `run-implement` — via `Workflow({ scriptPath, args })`, with the slice tasks as input. There is no install step: the script runs where it ships.
+ There is a single `/start:implement`, and it always runs on Claude Code's **dynamic-workflow runtime**. It reads the spec's tasks from the tracker and launches the plugin's reusable workflow script — `plugins/start/workflows/implement.js`, whose `meta.name` is `run-implement` — via `Workflow({ scriptPath, args })`, with the slice tasks as input. There is no install step: the script runs where it ships.
The workflow drives each slice through a **barriered code→eval retry loop**:
- a **code agent** builds the slice via TDD — it reads the slice task (features + EARS + gates), never its scenario child tasks;
- an **eval agent** proves the slice against its scenario child tasks through external interfaces — it reads the scenarios + service config, never the slice or the source;
- failures are filtered to one-line summaries and fed back until the slice's scenarios pass the `threshold`, or `max_iterations` is reached; each failed scenario becomes a `type: bug` child task.
The information barrier is *which task each agent reads* — the code agent the slice, the eval agent its scenario children. Independent slices (no unmet dependency) run concurrently via the runtime's `parallel()`; dependent slices run in order. Scale is emergent — a 1-slice plan is a short loop, a 40-slice plan fans out. Specs created before this model (legacy `### BEAN-N` plans, `plan/` / `manifest.md`) are not run; `/start:implement` offers to re-run `/start:specify` to regenerate the tasks. Users invoke `/start:specify` and `/start:implement`; everything else is internal.
### Knowledge Capture
Discovered patterns, interfaces, and domain rules are automatically documented in:
- `docs/patterns/` - Technical patterns
- `docs/interfaces/` - External integrations
- `docs/domain/` - Business rules
### Constitution Enforcement
Optional `CONSTITUTION.md` at project root defines checkable rules:
- L1 (Must) - Blocking with autofix
- L2 (Should) - Blocking, manual fix
- L3 (May) - Advisory only
## File Naming Conventions
| Type | Location | Naming |
|------|----------|--------|
| Commands | `plugins/*/commands/*.md` | lowercase-kebab (e.g., `specify.md`) |
| Skills | `plugins/*/skills/*/SKILL.md` | directory is skill name |
- | Workflow scripts | `plugins/*/skills/*/reference/*.js` | file matches the skill; `meta.name` is **`run-<script>`** (see below) |
+ | Workflow scripts | `plugins/*/workflows/*.js` | `meta.name` is **`run-<script>`** (see below) |
| Agents | `plugins/team/agents/the-*/` | `the-[role]/[activity].md` |
| Output Styles | `plugins/*/output-styles/*.md` | Title Case (e.g., `The Startup.md`) |
| Specs | `.start/specs/[NNN]-*/` | 3-digit ID prefix |
### Skill vs workflow naming
A workflow's `meta.name` is always **`run-<script>`** — the script's filename with a `run-` prefix.
| | Skill | Workflow (`meta.name`) |
|---|---|---|
| Shape | short noun or verb — the thing you type | `run-` + the script filename |
| Example | `implement` | `run-implement` |
| Skill | Script | Workflow |
|---|---|---|
- | `implement` | `implement/reference/implement.js` | `run-implement` |
- | `analyze` | `analyze/reference/analyze.js` | `run-analyze` |
- | `review` | `review/reference/review.js` | `run-review` |
- | `specify-solution` | `specify-solution/reference/solution-review.js` | `run-solution-review` |
- | `daydream` | `daydream/reference/daydream.js` | `run-daydream` |
+ | `implement` | `workflows/implement.js` | `run-implement` |
+ | `analyze` | `workflows/analyze.js` | `run-analyze` |
+ | `review` | `workflows/review.js` | `run-review` |
+ | `specify-solution` | `workflows/solution-review.js` | `run-solution-review` |
+ | `daydream` | `workflows/daydream.js` | `run-daydream` |
The prefix is the whole convention: it is mechanically derivable (no naming judgment, so no drift), it
sorts every workflow together, and `run-` is instantly recognizable in the `/workflows` progress view and
the run-approval dialog. The name only has to *identify* the run — the view shows `meta.description` and
the phase list beside it, so the name carries no burden to describe.
**Never give a workflow the same `meta.name` as a skill.** Skills and workflows share one `/[plugin]:`
namespace, so identical names collide and the workflow shadows the skill — replacing a working entry
point with a script that cannot run standalone. The `run-` prefix makes that impossible by construction:
no skill is named `run-*`.
- ### Where workflow scripts live — and why not `workflows/`
+ ### Where workflow scripts live
- A plugin *can* ship workflows from a `workflows/` directory at the plugin root (or the `workflows`
- manifest field), which registers each as `/[plugin]:[meta.name]`. **Ours deliberately do not.** A script
- in `workflows/` becomes a command a user can type, and per the Claude Code docs a workflow script has
- "no direct filesystem or shell access" and cannot take mid-run user input — so none of ours can resolve
- its own `args`. They are engines their skill feeds via `Workflow({ scriptPath, args })`, not commands.
+ Scripts go in `plugins/*/workflows/` — the standard plugin location. Claude Code discovers them there
+ (or wherever the `workflows` manifest field points) and registers each as `/[plugin]:[meta.name]`, so
+ ours appear as `/start:run-implement`, `/start:run-analyze`, and so on.
- Each script therefore sits beside the one skill that launches it, in that skill's `reference/`. There is
- no install step and no version marker: the script runs where it ships, and the plugin version governs.
+ `reference/` is for documentation a skill reads on demand — markdown, not executables. Workflow scripts
+ are orchestration code, and three of these skills needed no other reference files at all, so keeping the
+ script there meant a directory that existed only to hold it.
+
+ **These commands exist but are not entry points.** A workflow script gets no filesystem or shell access
+ and cannot take mid-run user input, so none of ours can resolve its own `args` — the skill builds them
+ (resolving the spec, seeding the tracker, getting the plan approved) and launches the script with
+ `Workflow({ scriptPath, args })`. Every script therefore opens with a **fail-fast guard**: launched
+ without usable args it throws immediately, naming the missing fields and the skill to run instead,
+ rather than templating `undefined` into every prompt and producing an empty report.
+
+ So: use `/start:implement`, not `/start:run-implement`. The `run-` prefix marks the second kind.
+
+ There is no install step and no version marker — the script runs where it ships, and the plugin version
+ governs.
## Publishing
The repository is a Claude Code marketplace. Publishing happens via:
1. Push to `main` branch
2. GitHub Actions workflow creates release
3. Users install via `/plugin marketplace add rsmdt/the-startup`