v0.1.0 to v0.1.2

---

name: az-first-30-days

description: >

---

# Arizona — First 30 Days After Service

> **NOT LEGAL ADVICE.** Time is short. This skill helps a defendant

> sketch a response and surface the most important deadlines, but

> consult a licensed Arizona attorney about substantive defenses when

> possible.

Use this skill when the defendant has **just been served** with a civil

summons and complaint in an Arizona **Superior Court** (or a limited-

jurisdiction Justice Court — see `az-justice-courts`). It frames the

response window: the time in which the defendant must answer, move to

dismiss, or risk default.

## The clock — Ariz. R. Civ. P. 12(a)

| Event | Deadline | Authority |

|---|---|---|

| Answer — served **within Arizona** | **20 days** after service | Ariz. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i) |

| Answer — served **outside Arizona** | **30 days** after completion of service | Ariz. R. Civ. P. 4.2(m) |

| Answer to a counterclaim / cross-claim | **20 days** after service | Ariz. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(B) |

| Responsive pleading after the court denies a Rule 12 motion | **10 days** after notice of the court's action | Ariz. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(2)(A) |

The **20-day / 30-day** split is the stable, statutory-style count.

Still confirm against the current Rule 12(a) (it sets several sub-

deadlines by service mode and posture) and compute the actual due date

with `az-deadlines` (Rule 6 time computation + the mail / service add-

ons). Verify all subsection numbers against the corpus before relying on

them.

> ⚠ **Default risk.** If the defendant neither answers nor moves within

> the window, the plaintiff may apply for **entry of default** under

> Rule 55(a) and then seek a **default judgment** under Rule 55(b).

> Setting a default aside later is hard — see the Rule 55 section below

> and `az-post-judgment`.

## Playbook

### Days 0-3 — read the complaint, check the summons

- **Read every numbered paragraph.** Note who is suing, on what claims,

for what relief, and what contracts / accounts / events are alleged.

- **Note the court, county, and case number** — these go on every filing

(`az-statewide-format` caption).

- **Check service** and the summons. Defective service / lack of personal

jurisdiction is a defense — preserve it (Rule 12(b)(2), (4), (5); Rule

12(h) waiver).

- **Note the court level**: Superior Court (general civil) vs. Justice

Court (limited jurisdiction; confirm the cap via `az-justice-courts`).

### Days 3-10 — choose the response strategy

Three principal paths: (1) **Answer** under Rule 8 — admit, deny, or

plead lack of knowledge per paragraph (Rule 8(c)), state affirmative

defenses (Rule 8(d)), assert counterclaims (Rule 13); (2) **Motion to

Dismiss** under Rule 12(b), in lieu of an answer (grounds below); (3)

**Motion for a More Definite Statement** (Rule 12(e)) — disfavored.

> ⚠ **Plead affirmative defenses — Rule 8(d).** Arizona requires a party

> to **affirmatively state** any avoidance or affirmative defense in the

> responsive pleading; defenses omitted from the answer can be **waived**.

> This includes statute of limitations, release, payment, accord and

> satisfaction, statute of frauds, res judicata, and lack of standing /

> chain of title. **Plead all that may apply.** Verify Rule 8(d) and the

> waiver consequences before filing.

### Motion to dismiss — Rule 12(b)

The Rule 12(b) grounds, raised by motion before or with the answer:

| Subrule | Ground |

|---|---|

| **(b)(1)** | lack of subject-matter jurisdiction |

| **(b)(2)** | lack of personal jurisdiction |

| **(b)(3)** | improper venue |

| **(b)(4)** | insufficient process |

| **(b)(5)** | insufficient service of process |

| **(b)(6)** | **failure to state a claim** upon which relief can be granted |

| **(b)(7)** | failure to join a party under Rule 19 |

> **Rule 12(b)(6) — tested on the pleadings; conversion to Rule 56.** A

> 12(b)(6) motion tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint on the

> **pleadings alone**, accepting well-pleaded allegations as true. **If

> matters outside the pleadings are presented and not excluded, the

> motion is treated as one for summary judgment under Rule 56** with a

> reasonable opportunity to present Rule 56 material (Rule 12(d) — verify

> the subsection). Do not attach evidence to a 12(b)(6) motion unless you

> intend conversion; if a fact dispute matters, move under Rule 56. The

> Arizona summary-judgment standard is *Orme School v. Reeves*, 166 Ariz.

> 301 (1990) — **verify the citation and holding**. SJ standards and

> timing live in `az-draft-motion`; this skill flags them at a pointer

> level.

> **Preserve the threatened defenses — Rule 12(h).** Lack of personal

> jurisdiction, improper venue, insufficient process, and insufficient

> service can be **waived** if not raised in the first Rule 12 motion or

> the answer. Raise them at the first opportunity; verify Rule 12(h).

> ⚠ **COMPULSORY ARBITRATION — Rules 72-77.** Arizona Superior Courts run

> a **mandatory (compulsory) arbitration program**. A civil case in which

> the amount in controversy does **not exceed the jurisdictional limit

> set by the county's Superior Court local rule** is **automatically

> assigned to a single arbitrator** and removed from the trial calendar

> until arbitration concludes — expect this for ordinary consumer-debt

> and small civil cases. Each party files a **certificate of compulsory

> arbitration** (or a controverting certificate) early in the case

> stating whether the case is subject to arbitration. An arbitration

> **award** may be **appealed for a trial de novo**, but an appealing

> party who fails to better its position can face cost / fee

> consequences. **Confirm your county's dollar threshold** and the

> certificate requirement via `az-law-references` and the local rule.

> This is a defining feature of Arizona civil practice — flag it for the

> client at the outset.

### Days 10-30 — draft the answer (or the motion)

#### Answer structure (Rule 8)

```

ANSWER,

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND COUNTERCLAIM

Defendant [Name] answers Plaintiff's Complaint as follows:

ANSWER

1. Defendant admits the allegations in paragraph 1.

2. Defendant denies the allegations in paragraph 2.

3. Defendant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a

belief about the truth of paragraph 3, which has the effect of a

denial.

[...]

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

(Rule 8(d) — omission may waive)

1. Plaintiff's claims are barred by the statute of limitations.

2. Plaintiff lacks standing / chain of title to the alleged debt.

3. [Release / payment / accord & satisfaction / statute of frauds /

res judicata / failure to state a claim / etc.]

COUNTERCLAIM

[If asserting one, plead it complaint-style with numbered factual

allegations and named counts — Rule 13.]

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Defendant demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.

```

#### Affirmative-defense catalog — Rule 8(d)

Plead **all** that may apply. Common Arizona defenses:

- Statute of limitations (very common — verify the period against

`az-statutes-debt` / the relevant subject bundle)

- Payment / accord and satisfaction / release

- Discharge in bankruptcy

- Statute of frauds

- Estoppel / waiver / laches

- Failure of consideration / fraud / illegality

- Res judicata / collateral estoppel (prior judgment)

- Lack of standing / chain of title (debt-buyer cases — see

`az-consumer-debt`)

- Failure to state a claim (Rule 12(b)(6))

### Counterclaims and cross-claims — Rule 13

- **Rule 13(a) — compulsory counterclaim.** A pleader must state any

counterclaim against the opposing party arising out of the

**transaction or occurrence** that is the subject of the opposing

party's claim, or the claim may be **barred** in later litigation.

Plead all known related counterclaims with the answer.

- **Rule 13(b)** — permissive counterclaim (unrelated claims); **cross-

claims** against co-parties are also governed by Rule 13. Verify the

current text and scope of the bar.

### Jury trial — Rule 38

**Arizona does not use the FRCP demand-or-waive model.** Under Rule

38(a), the right to a jury trial on any issue triable of right by a jury

is **preserved inviolate, and a party need not file a written demand or

take any other action to preserve it.** A jury right is **waived only by

an affirmative written stipulation signed by all parties who appear at

trial** (or an approved oral stipulation in open court), filed **no later

than 30 days before the trial** is scheduled to begin (Rule 38(b)).

Including a jury demand in the answer (above) is permissible belt-and-

suspenders practice but is not required to preserve the right; confirm

the current text of Rule 38.

### Entry of default and setting it aside — Rule 55

- **Rule 55(a) — application for entry of default.** The plaintiff files

and serves an application; the default does **not** become effective

immediately — the defendant has a short **cure window** (verify the

current number of business days) to plead or otherwise defend. If the

defendant pleads within it, default does not enter. **Treat an

application for default as a hard signal to file the answer at once.**

- **Rule 55(b)** — default judgment entered after default is effective.

- **Rule 55(c)** — setting aside an entry of default for **good cause**.

- **Setting aside a default *judgment*** is governed by **Rule 60(b)/(c)**

and is a demanding standard — not a fallback for missing the answer

window. Vacatur is developed in `az-post-judgment`. Verify the Rule 55

cure-window count and the Rule 60 grounds against the corpus.

## Filing the answer / motion

- **File** with the clerk of the Superior Court (or Justice Court) in the

caption (confirm the e-filing platform — AZTurboCourt / county portal

where mandated; otherwise paper).

- **Serve** all parties under Rule 5 with a certificate of service.

- **Sign** under Rule 11 (certifies the pleading is well-grounded;

sanctions attach to violations).

- **File the certificate of compulsory arbitration** (Rules 72-77) where

the county requires it.

## Composition

- Format / caption: `az-statewide-format`

- Drafting + the *Orme School* summary-judgment standard:

`az-draft-motion`, `az-draft-declaration`

- Filing court: `az-maricopa`, `az-pima`, `az-superior-courts`,

`az-justice-courts`

- Deadline arithmetic: `az-deadlines`; default vacatur: `az-post-judgment`

- Matter-specific defenses: `az-consumer-debt`, `az-family-law`,

`az-landlord-tenant`, `az-personal-injury`, `az-employment`,

`az-commercial-disputes`

## References

- `references/answer-template.md` — full Rule 8 answer scaffold with the

Rule 8(d) affirmative-defenses section

- `references/motion-to-dismiss-grounds.md` — Rule 12(b)(1)-(7)

annotated, with the 12(b)(6) → Rule 56 conversion note

- `references/affirmative-defense-catalog.md` — annotated, keyed to the

Rule 8(d) statement requirement

- `references/default-and-set-aside.md` — Rule 55 entry / cure window /

Rule 55(c) good cause + Rule 60(b) default-judgment vacatur

- `references/compulsory-arbitration.md` — Rules 72-77 track, county

thresholds, certificate of compulsory arbitration, appeal for a trial

de novo