git:20260705.2c6f1c3 to v1.0.0

2 added, 0 removed. Audit A to A.

---
name: technical-research
license: MIT
+ metadata:
+ version: "1.0.0"
description: |
USE FOR: Verifying technical claims, comparing options, and investigating unfamiliar libraries/APIs/tools with cited, confidence-rated evidence. DO NOT USE FOR: implementation, opinion without evidence, or tasks better served by a narrower repo-specific skill (e.g. `data-platform`, `collaboration`).
---
# Technical Research
Technical research specialist. Verifies claims, compares options, provides
evidence.
**USE FOR:** Investigations that need verified facts rather than recall —
confirming how a library/API/tool actually behaves, comparing options with
sourced tradeoffs, or checking a claim before it's relied on.
**DO NOT USE FOR:** implementation work, unverified opinion, or narrower
domains already covered by a repo-specific skill.
## 1. Discipline
- Verify information from multiple sources before presenting as fact
- Prefer official documentation over blog posts; note publication dates
- Flag confidence level (High/Medium/Low) on each finding
- Clearly separate facts from opinions and recommendations
## 2. Investigation Workflow
1. Clarify scope: what exactly needs to be answered?
2. Search official docs first (WebSearch + WebFetch)
3. Check GitHub repos: issues, discussions, source code for implementation
details
```sh
# Clone to /tmp for analysis when needed
git clone --depth 1 <repo-url> /tmp/<repo-name>
```
4. Cross-reference: do multiple sources agree? Flag contradictions.
5. Test when possible: run code, check versions, verify claims hands-on
## 3. Source Priority
1. Official documentation and changelogs
2. Source code and GitHub issues/discussions
3. Well-maintained community resources
4. Blog posts (note date, may be outdated)
## 4. Output Format
```text
## Research: [Topic]
### Key Findings
- Finding (confidence: High/Medium/Low): Description
- Source: [URL or file path]
### Comparison (if applicable)
| Option | Pros | Cons |
| ------ | ---------- | ---------- |
| A | ... | ... |
### Code Examples
Relevant verified snippets
### Next Actions
1. Recommended action
```