code-quality · git:20260329.107e82c · 2026-03-29 · sha256 0410bc1f211a22a5
code-quality git:20260329.107e82cA
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/0410bc1f211a22a5.
--- name: code-quality description: "Code review and bug prediction to find quality issues, style violations, and likely bugs. Triggers on: review, quality, code review, analyze, lint, bugs, predict, code smell." --- # Code Quality ## Scoping Before running, ask: 1. **Scope**: "Which files or directory should I review?" 2. **Depth**: "Quick scan, thorough, or deep review?" - Quick: code_review only - Thorough: code_review + bug_predict combined - Deep: deep_review (security + quality + test gaps) ## Execution **Quick scan:** ``` code_review(path="<user-specified path>") ``` **Thorough analysis:** ``` code_review(path="<user-specified path>") bug_predict(path="<user-specified path>") ``` Merge and deduplicate results from both tools. **Deep review** (multi-pass: security, quality, test gaps): ``` deep_review(path="<user-specified path>") ``` ## Output Format ```markdown ## Code Quality Report **Health:** X/100 | **Files:** Y | **Issues:** Z ### Issues by Category | Category | Count | Severity | |----------|-------|----------| | Style | X | Low | | Correctness | Y | High | | Security | Z | Critical | | Predicted Bugs | W | Medium | ### Details | File | Line | Issue | Source | |------|------|-------|--------| ### Predicted Bug Risks | File | Pattern | Confidence | |------|---------|------------| ``` ## Follow-Up After presenting results, offer: - "Want me to fix these issues?" - "Should I generate tests for the risky areas?" - "Want to run a security-focused deep scan?"