code-quality · git:20260625.f0bf509 · 2026-06-25 · sha256 673147a1fb7ae72e
code-quality git:20260625.f0bf509A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/673147a1fb7ae72e.
--- name: code-quality description: "Code review to find quality issues, style violations, and code smells. Triggers on: review, code review, quality, lint, code smell, analyze code." --- # Code Quality **IMPORTANT: Start your response with a context preamble.** Call `help_lookup(topic="code-quality", mode="preamble")` and display the returned `preamble` text as a blockquote. Then tell the user they can say "tell me more" for a step-by-step guide, or answer the scoping questions below to proceed. If the MCP call fails, fall back to: > **Code Quality** — Reviews your code for style issues, likely bugs, and structural problems in one pass. ## Scoping Before running, ask: 1. **Scope**: "Which files or directory should I review?" 2. **Depth**: "Quick scan, thorough, or deep review?" - Quick: code_review only - Thorough: code_review + bug_predict combined - Deep: deep_review (security + quality + test gaps) ## Execution **Quick scan:** ``` code_review(path="<user-specified path>") ``` **Thorough analysis:** ``` code_review(path="<user-specified path>") bug_predict(path="<user-specified path>") ``` Merge and deduplicate results from both tools. **Deep review** (multi-pass: security, quality, test gaps): ``` deep_review(path="<user-specified path>") ``` ## Output Format ```markdown ## Code Quality Report **Health:** X/100 | **Files:** Y | **Issues:** Z ### Issues by Category | Category | Count | Severity | |----------|-------|----------| | Style | X | Low | | Correctness | Y | High | | Security | Z | Critical | | Predicted Bugs | W | Medium | ### Details | File | Line | Issue | Source | |------|------|-------|--------| ### Predicted Bug Risks | File | Pattern | Confidence | |------|---------|------------| ``` ## Help After presenting results, call: ``` help_lookup(topic="code-quality", mode="workflow_help") ``` If templates are returned, offer: "I have tips about code quality reviews — want to see them?" ## Follow-Up After presenting results, offer: - "Want me to fix these issues?" - "Should I generate tests for the risky areas?" - "Want to run a security-focused deep scan?"